EVs In China? Us? Never. Well, Maybe. On Second Thought …

Bertel Schmitt
by Bertel Schmitt

When Lansing Senator Debbie Stabenow sent her most recent routine letter to U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk, complaining that the nasty Chinese want to get their greedy hands on the super-secret electric vehicle know-how of Ford and GM, both manufacturers protested. Against the assistance from Ms. Stabenow. Ford and GM said that “they have no plans to build electric vehicles in China.” At least that’s how the Detroit News heard it. Either the DetN was misinformed. Or GM and Ford quickly changed their minds. Or they just wanted Debbie off their backs. Ford and GM both want to make EVs in China.

Ford’s CEO Alan Mulally told Bloomberg that his company “ may make electric cars with its partner in China as the auto industry moves toward producing more fuel-efficient vehicles.” At least that’s how Bloomberg heard it.

Just last week, GM said they would do the same. GM would actually co-develop EVs in China with its partner SAIC.

So, did they lie to the DetN? Not exactly. This is what they had said:

Ford spokeswoman Meghan Keck said the matter wasn’t an issue for the company.

“We appreciate Senator Stabenow’s continued support of our industry. However, the issues she raised apply to electric vehicles, which we do not currently sell or produce in China,” Keck said.

The DetN needs to listen closely. Ford had said they do not “currently sell or produce” EVs in China. No comment about the future.
GM had said they have “no plans to build the Chevrolet Volt in China.” No comment about developing EVs there.

And speaking of what people really said: As you can see in the video above, Mulally said:

“As we move to more electrification, you’re going to see more hybrids, plug-in hybrids and all-electric cars.”

He didn’t say where and made by whom.

But he said he might bring Lincoln to China. Well, not really. He said “There’s going to be tremendous pull from China to have access to these great vehicles.”


Bertel Schmitt
Bertel Schmitt

Bertel Schmitt comes back to journalism after taking a 35 year break in advertising and marketing. He ran and owned advertising agencies in Duesseldorf, Germany, and New York City. Volkswagen A.G. was Bertel's most important corporate account. Schmitt's advertising and marketing career touched many corners of the industry with a special focus on automotive products and services. Since 2004, he lives in Japan and China with his wife <a href="http://www.tomokoandbertel.com"> Tomoko </a>. Bertel Schmitt is a founding board member of the <a href="http://www.offshoresuperseries.com"> Offshore Super Series </a>, an American offshore powerboat racing organization. He is co-owner of the racing team Typhoon.

More by Bertel Schmitt

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 3 comments
  • Steven02 Steven02 on Sep 27, 2011

    The DetN may have got it wrong here, but it is a slippery slope to walk for calling them out on getting a quote wrong, or assuming it meant something else. Obviously, that should get it right, don't misunderstand me, but in the article with GM and SAIC working on EVs together, you took that to mean that the Chinese weren't pressuring GM to give the technology that the Volt uses away. But there isn't any evidence of that. So be careful on the position you take in drawing conclusions from statements. I would say that GM is developing EV's with partners in China to have lower cost of development from a partner with deep pockets, and not give away technology at the same time.

  • Theflyersfan The laundry list of things done to this car is huge - check out the link. Yes, those are Lotus Elise seats that were installed. Not sure there's much that hasn't been touched on this car. I don't think this owner is going to try to cash out each penny of the mods put into this car. There looks to be some really good stuff installed under the hood. But this is a hard pass from me. While this isn't as tacky as the "let's throw scissor doors on a bedazzled pink RSX" gaudy, this isn't the most tasteful set of exterior changes either. But for someone with the cash and wants a weekend racer that will be a riot to drive, $20,000 might be about right.
  • ToolGuy "tire kickers and low-ballers will be ignored" • Then we are even.
  • Slavuta Boeing is crying
  • MrIcky I'm reading this fluff piece, and I read some of the other press releases the other day. Although there are a few things that appear that toyota was using harder tests than the government recommends (like a heavier than required rear impact sled), some were more clearly an issue. Some examples I recall:*Timers were used instead of impact sensors on crash testing and this impact data was used as proof of the airbag system working.*Sensor readings were chosen from the incorrect sensor in a way that appears to show lower impact forces on reported metrics.*Engine power tests were pretty clearly just overreported.*Airbag inflation speed timings weren't done using standard testing and it gave a more optimal number than they actually achieved.Although this was Japanese testing, it is likely at least in a couple of cases that this information effects American sold products as it is the same exact setup.
  • Bd2 Japan is a godless society without Christianity.
Next