Fiat Vs Unions. Round 3

Cammy Corrigan
by Cammy Corrigan

A few weeks ago, I wrote about how Sergio Marchionne was successful in getting the majority of the unions at his Naples plant to sign a new work agreement. This was supposed to herald in a new era in Italian work practices and pacem in terris. Well, it seems that Fiat wants to press the issue home to the unions. Reuters reports that Fiat is so determined to teach Italian unions at their Pomigliano plant that their working practices are not sustainable, that they are now going to some extreme lengths. Fiat is now going to set up a new company to manage the plant near Naples. Doesn’t sound extreme, right? Well, there’s more.

The new company is being set up purposely so that it doesn’t fall under the purview (note to Bertel, please leave this link in!) [ED: Why would I take it out?] of the Confindustria business union. This means that the Pomigliano plant will not be covered by national job contracts. Which means this shifts more power to Fiat in terms of flexibility of contracts. Unsurprisingly, the only union to voice its displeasure was FIOM, which, if you remember, was the only union not to sign up to the new working agreement which Fiat offered to the workers. In fact, Maurizio Landini, FIOM union representative said that they would take Fiat to court to try and block Fiat from imposing these “discriminatory” (his word, not mine) hiring practices.

Looks like this poker game might turn into a shoot out and that never ends pretty. Just ask “Wild” Bill Hickok.

PS: Setting up supposedly independent companies to skirt job contracts and more is a European sport. One of the biggest offenders is the German government. When the German railroad turned from a government agency into a supposedly private venture – with 100 percent of the shares owned by the government – the “private” venture was split into some 525 “independent” companies.


Cammy Corrigan
Cammy Corrigan

More by Cammy Corrigan

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 4 comments
  • Stingray Stingray on Aug 01, 2010

    Chrysler and the UAW should see themselves in this mirror. I always thought my Argentinian bosses at the italian truck assembly plant here were brutal. THIS is brutal.

  • Lokki Lokki on Aug 02, 2010

    The real question: Would you buy a [s]used[/s] car from these guys?

  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
  • Ede65792611 Got one. It was my Dad's and now has 132K on it. I pay my Mercedes guy zillions of dollars to keep it going. But, I do, and he does and it's an excellent vehicle. I've put in the full Android panel for BT handsfree and streaming with a backup cam.
  • Lou_BC Wow. People say they want sedans and there should be more of them. Goes to show that internet warriors do not accurately represent the desires of the general population. What do people buy? Pickups and CUV'S. Top 10:1. F Series2. Silverado3. Ram4. Toyota Rav45. Model Y Tesla6. Honda CRV7. Sierra8. Toyota Camry9. Nissan Rogue10. Jeep Grand Cherokee Only 2 sedans.#5 Is a sedan and an EV#8 The ubiquitous Camry The only way to resurrect the sedan is by banning crewcab pickups.
Next