Canadian Smart Licenses Raise Privacy Issues

Samir Syed
by Samir Syed

Here’s a story that proves that incompetence and general apathy isn’t limited to the DMV where Patty & Selma Bouvier earn their living. Starting now, Quebec motorists can offer up $51.97 above the current cost of a driver’s license to obtain what the provincial government is calling “Smart” driver’s licenses. These licenses will come equipped with an RFID chip that can be scanned remotely by US border guards to identify approaching drivers. Introduced by Quebec’s version of a DMV, the SAAQ, these chipped IDs are meant to allow Quebecers to comply with new Department of Homeland Security regulations that require government-issued identification when entering the US by land. Here’s the problem: The (highly personal) information emitted by the RFID can also be read by anyone else who, with $250 and a working knowledge of eBay, can obtain the necessary equipment. To make matters worse, no encryption or security measures were implemented on these “Smart” licenses. Needless to say, it’s an identity thief’s wet dream.

In a study conducted by the Montreal daily, La Presse, a security consultant was able to record information from several nearby licenses, all while driving aimlessly on the highway. According to La Presse: “It only takes one hidden radio to clone anyone’s license.” In the same tests, a security consultant was able to record license information from as far as 15 meters away.

In its response to criticisms that the “Smart” licenses may, just may, create some privacy issues, the SAAQ notes that it provided motorists who’ve applied for the enhancement a special slipcase for the license that blocks all transmissions. You know, except when you take it out to show a US border guard, or a liquor store clerk, or a bank—wait a minute.

In the meantime, former federal Transport Minister and current radio jockey, Jean Lapierre, suggested, in an interview with Montreal’s CJAD 800 AM on May 7, 2009, that Quebecers should apply for a Canadian passport instead, which suits the DHS just fine and doesn’t broadcast any personal information. Since a passport application costs $100, for another $48.03 over the incremental cost of a “Smart” license, you get the ability to actually take a plane somewhere too!

Samir Syed
Samir Syed

Please visit my homepage for all things me.

More by Samir Syed

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 39 comments
  • R H R H on May 12, 2009

    How hard would it be to have your own radio signal that overpowers any RFID chips near you & gives out false data? Does RFID use a licensed band?

  • Denca1 Denca1 on Sep 02, 2011

    I say that when we all have the chipped cards and our identity gets stolen that we should sue our government for mandating the chipped cards in the first place and the government can pick up the tab of expenses incurred against our name.. Maybe then this will change but enough people have to make this change.

  • Slavuta CX5 hands down. Only trunk space, where RAV4 is better.
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X Oof 😣 for Tesla.https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-05-03-nhtsa-probes-tesla-recall-over-autopilot-concerns.html
  • Slavuta Autonomous cars can be used by terrorists.
  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
Next