Mid-Size Cars Struggle in New IIHS Test

mid size cars struggle in new iihs test

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has updated its side crash test and the results for mid-size cars is, uh, not good.

Just three of seven mid-size cars earned good or acceptable ratings in the test, with only the Subaru Outback earning a "good" rating. The Hyundai Sonata and Volkswagen Jetta earned "acceptable marks.

IIHS says that the mid-size cars didn't do as well on the test as small and mid-size SUVs, likely due to their lower ride height.

"With vehicles that sit lower to the ground, the striking barrier hits higher on the door panel,” says IIHS President David Harkey. “That potentially puts sedans and wagons at a disadvantage in this evaluation but reflects what happens in a real-world crash when these vehicles are struck by a higher-riding pickup or SUV.”

The head-protecting airbags for the driver and front passenger did well for the Outback, Sonata, and Jetta, but the driver's pelvis and rear passenger's torso were at higher injury risk in the Jetta. Same for the rear passenger's pelvis in the Sonata.

Honda's Accord scored a marginal rating, while the Chevrolet Malibu, Nissan Altima, and Toyota Camry were all marked as poor.

The IIHS made the test tougher to better reflect what was happening in the real world after research showed that real-life crashes were more severe than what the previous test would indicate.

The updated test uses a heavier barrier -- now up to 4,200 pounds, to better approximate the curb weight of SUVs -- and hits at 37 mph. The previous test involved a 3,300 lb barrier hitting at 31 mph.

IIHS isn't yet using the test in its award criteria. That said, starting in 2023, cars will need a good or acceptable rating on the test in order to be a Top Safety Pick and a good rating to be a Top Safety Pick+.

[Image: Screenshot of IIHS' video]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Join the conversation
2 of 48 comments
  • THX1136 THX1136 Yesterday

    Thanks for the replies BetterOne & jkross22. I believe we're on the same page.

  • DweezilSFV DweezilSFV Yesterday


    Arbitrary new "tests" in a lab don't make a previous model "less safe".

    But they will raise the cost and weight on the buyer for marginally improved "saaaaafety".

    And still, people want to "believe" their lives can be free of risks if "experts" tell them so.

    The insurance industry serves itself.

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.