GM Doesn’t Rule Out Eventual Return for Bolt

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

It’s a common knock on GM that the company has a tendency to kill its darlings just as they get them right; look no further into history than the Pontiac Fiero and Cadillac Allanté as two good examples*. Some pundits muttered similar oaths about the all-electric Bolt when news surfaced that the model isn’t long for this world – but statements on an NPR podcast last week could give hope to the popular (and affordable) little EV.


Appearing on the broadcaster’s Marketplace podcast, GM boss Mary Barra spoke about the company’s current electric ambitions and mentioned she had just taken delivery of a new Cadillac Lyriq. That EV replaced a Bolt, she explained, describing it as a car she absolutely loved during her few months behind the wheel. Naturally, the podcast host asked why The General was pulling the plug on it. From NPR’s transcripts:


“Because it’s our second-generation technology. The difference between our second generation and third generation, which is Ultium, is a 40% reduction in battery costs. And we’re leveraging the names of our vehicles that are well understood and known in industry.”


This is the explanation most reasonable people expected. The new Ultium platform is several leagues more advanced than the gubbins found in the Bolt and Bolt EUV – its batteries are more energy dense and arguably easier to adapt to differently sized vehicles, to say nothing of the huge reduction in costs. Car companies love to save money, especially if it means those dollars can be shoveled towards the development of new technologies which can then be used to beat their competitors over the head. 


To be sure, the Bolt’s cancellation is reasonable from a technical point of view. Keeping up production would be like continuing to produce VCRs long after everyone switched to DVDs. Still, both Bolts are popular models largely loved by their owners and still Doing Numbers in terms of sales. An attractive price point is a key selling feature, as is a reasonable driving range on a full charge. Sure, the Equinox EV is on its way with a promised $30,000-ish price tag, but the Bolt is here now.


Following up on her thoughts, Barra went on to say the Bolt has a wealth of loyalty and equity in its name, suggesting the company realizes it would be foolish to flush that down the toilet. Citing the move from Gen 2 to Gen 3 electric architecture, Barra pointed out that the Bolt is “an important vehicle in our portfolio,” leaving the door open to a Bolt reprise constructed with Ultium bones. 


*Ed. note -- One could also say this about the Pontiac brand right before the bankruptcy. Ahem, Pontiac G8 anyone? But I digress.


[Image: GM]


Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 36 comments
  • Jud65709025 Jud65709025 on Jun 14, 2023

    GM...this is easy marketing. Announce Bolt will be on hiatus. When the next gen is 6 months from launch start a countdown. Bolt loyalists will go crazy!

  • Sgeffe Sgeffe on Jun 14, 2023

    “Car companies love to save money, especially if it means those dollars can be shoveled towards the development of new technologies which can then be used to beat their competitors over the head, and find new ways to extract more money from customers after the sale by making such luxuries as heated seats a subscription.”


    FIFY!


  • EBFlex Interesting. We are told there is insatiable demand for EVs yet here is another major manufacturer pivoting away from EV manufacturing and going to hybrid. Did these manufacturers finally realize that the government lied to them and that consumers really don’t want EVs?
  • Kwik_Shift_Pro4X What's worse than a Malibu?
  • MaintenanceCosts The current Malibu is poorly packaged; there's far more room inside a Camry or Accord, even though the exterior footprint is similar. It doesn't have any standout attributes to balance out the poor packaging. I won't miss it. But it is regrettable that none of our US-based carmakers will be selling an ordinary sedan in their home market.
  • Jkross22 You can tell these companies are phoning these big sedans in. Tech isn't luxury. Hard to figure out isn't luxury.This looks terrible, there are a lot of screens, there's a lot to get used to and it's not that powerful. BMW gave up on this car along time ago. The nesting doll approach used to work when all of their cars were phenomenal. It doesn't work when there's nothing to aspire to with this brand, which is where they are today. Just had seen an A8 - prior generation before the current. What a sharp looking car. I didn't like how they drove, but they were beautifully designed. The current LS is a dog. The new A8 is ok, but the interior is a disaster, the Mercedes is peak gaudy and arguably Genesis gets closest to what these all should be, although it's no looker either.
  • Ajla My only experience with this final version of the Malibu was a lady in her 70s literally crying to me about having one as a loaner while her Equinox got its engine replaced under warranty. The problem was that she could not comfortably get in and out of it.
Next