Elon Musk Tweet Leads to Investigation of Tesla

by Tim Healey

Published: January 10th, 2023

elon musk tweet leads to investigation of tesla

Stop me if you've heard this before -- Elon Musk tweeted something that has him and/or one of his companies in trouble with regulators.

From CNN: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration confirmed Monday that it is in contact with Tesla about Musk’s tweet in which he “agreed” that Tesla drivers should be allowed to disable the alert reminding them to keep their hands on the steering wheel while in “Full Self Driving” mode, which is a driver assist system in an early “beta” version that does not fully drive the car itself.

On December 31, Musk replied to a tweet by @WholeMarsBlog that said “users with more than 10,000 miles on FSD Beta should be given the option to turn off the steering wheel nag.”

“Agreed, update coming in Jan,” Musk replied.

NHTSA says the issue falls under the agency’s existing investigation into the performance of Tesla’s driver assist systems.

“The investigation opening was motivated by an accumulation of crashes in which Tesla vehicles, operating with Autopilot engaged, struck stationary in-road or roadside first responder vehicles tending to pre-existing collision scenes,” reads the summary of the investigation which opened in June.

The federal inquiry into the tweet was first reported by the Associated Press.

So to recap: Tesla sycophant @WholeMarsBlog suggested that the FSD system lose one of its safety backups -- a system that uses pressure sensors in the steering wheel to make sure a driver is ready to take over if need be -- if the user had accumulated 10,000 miles of using the system. Musk seemed to agree.

Allow me to editorialize further: From a safety perspective, that's not great!

Once again, shouting this from the rooftops: THERE ARE NO SELF-DRIVING CARS FOR SALE TODAY.

I'm not a Luddite or necessarily anti-autonomous driving, but it seems like an unsafe idea to pull back on safety systems when it comes to these semi-autonomous driving systems. Especially when NHTSA is investigating how well these systems work.

Meanwhile, Jalopnik reports that this news broke on the same day that Tesla announced it would be more lenient when it comes to suspending users who are Full-Self Driving Beta testers. In the past, Tesla would boot drivers who weren't attentive enough for six months, now it will just be two weeks. Drivers get repeated warnings via the safety systems before they get the boot. Tesla also opened the program up to all drivers in November -- previously, they had to pass a safety test.

In summary, Tesla seems to be reducing safety backups for its system as it comes under investigation -- and as crashes mount. Insider reports over 750 incidents of unplanned hard braking, as one example.

Meanwhile, a Tesla stopped unexpectedly on San Francisco's Bay Bridge and caused an eight-car pileup that injured a child. Video at the link.

Maybe, just maybe, and hear me out here, we should hit the brakes (pun fully intended) on having customers be beta testers while also reducing safety backups? For the safety of all road users?

My apologies for editorializing a news piece more than I normally do, but it's so tiring to see Musk be so careless regarding the safety not only of Tesla drivers and passengers but the rest of us on the road.

[Image: Tesla]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

#ElonMusk #Tesla #fullselfdriving #FSD #NHTSA #Investigations #AutonomousDriving

Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 10 comments

Mike1041 on Jan 10, 2023

The man is intent on bankrupting himself it would seem

Like Reply
Vulpine on Jan 11, 2023

Just one note on that San Francisco pileup:

After the crash, the operator of the vehicle CLAIMED he was using FSD, however, the police department investigating the crash did not take the driver's word for it and is withholding judgement until they can access the car's data for themselves; it is not a proven incident at this time, as far as I know.

1 Reply

Recent Comments

Fred Do what GM wants, cut costs. Pull out of racing hyper cars, defund the F1 program. Finally make more SUVs.
Cprescott I would do the following for Cadihack:[list=1][*] Make the V-Series as the base model and then add hybrid to the upgrade;[/*][*]Can the hideous Arts and Scientology (!) design disaster and bring out smoother yet crisp and sleek styling - no more boxes or tacky lighting. Let the body sculpturing win the day. I'd say take Audi and cross it with Genesis to give the vehicles stance and easily identifiable brand cues.[/*][*]Come up with interiors that are unique with quality materials and not something that looks like you ripped off Hyundai and Kia. The car must have four bucket seats that are all adjustable. [/*][*]Build to order. Get rid of this buying a Cadihack off the lot and sell at retail for a car built specifically for the client. Nothing makes a premium statement than a car built specifically for the customer - dealer will like because car will be sold at sticker.[/*][*]Expand exterior and interior colors and combinations.[/*][*]Share nothing with any other GM product. Each car / vehicle has to be a standout model even if the basis is common platform - if Hyundai/Kia/Genesis can pull this off, GM must be able to do.[/*][*]Do not mistake sticker price for luxury. The car's design and material integration will do that for you. If it does not feel, look, and smell premium, it is a Chevrolet.[/*][*]Special customer service - at the time of delivery, client gets to meet the service team that will deliver five years of complimentary service PLUS free tires for the first 50k. Special appointments and pick up car from customer and then bring it back. [/*][*]Loaner car delivered if vehicle is in the shop more than routine maintenance and picked up free of charge for first five years.[/*][*]Thoughtful design trumps technology. Vehicle should be intuitive to use and built to coddle the customer beyond his/her expectations. Vehicle must have "Wow!" - not just good enough.[/*][/list=1]
KOKing Kinda hate to say this but they need to be an American Land Rover sans the offroad image (and capability). Leave the Escalade alone and do a shrunken Escalade-esque lineup (the first time I saw a Hyundai Palisade I thought that was the XT6 that Cadillac shoulda made) and dump the alphabet soup models and trims.
Theflyersfan How to fix Cadillac? Blackwing.Now I know (because I've asked) dealers are still thinking they are selling Demons with the kinds of markups on Blackwings, but for enthusiast drivers in the know, those cars are legit. They get lost in the shuffle of M-this and AMG-that, but they hold their own. However, with rising CAFE standards and upcoming emissions requirements, along with European CO2 limits, they all can't be turbo V8s with no hybrid propulsion. So at least mild hybrid them to try to eke out another 8-10 mpg average. That's a good start. Do something with the Escalade. These aren't the early 2000s when they had the hip hop image and every corner had a jet black Escalade with chrome rims. In my area, you just don't see them any longer as money has moved to the Germans. If they want to compete with the Germans, they have to downsize it and crank the engine up to 11. It's still way too truckish to compete with the Q8, X7, and GLS. Even though they probably don't want to, keep the sedans. Don't give those up to the Germans, Japanese, and Koreans as well. And with all that, go all in with performance. Become what BMW was over 15 years ago. They tried that before and half assed it, but they have the tools to make it happen now. Try to appeal to the audience that BMW and Mercedes left behind and that Genesis and Acura are trying to claim (or reclaim). Good luck Cadillac...you'll need it.
SCE to AUX Introduce a modern V-16 and put it into a Celestiq-like vehicle instead of electric.