Junkyard Find: 2007 Subaru B9 Tribeca

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

By the early 2000s, Fuji Heavy Industries was raking in fat piles of yen by selling slightly lifted Subaru Legacy wagons with plastic cladding, weather-band radios, and a general air of outdoorsiness. The real money, though, would come from selling SUVs in North America, and so the Legacy chassis got the growth-hormone treatment and a truck-inspired body. This was the Subaru B9 Tribeca, which made its debut as a 2006 model.

The founder of this site described the early Tribeca as " an irredeemably gruesome beast whose design should have been aborted a femtosecond after conception." I think of it in more science-fictiony terms, as a Pleiades Edsel.

When humanity colonizes the Pleiades, we can assume that the Subaru logo will be all over the spacecraft involved. Ideally, those spacecraft will get B9 Tribeca grilles.

The original name of this vehicle was supposed to be the B9X, but then it was determined (we can presume) that the target demographic would respond better to the name of a geographical location known for rich people who wish to be surrounded by edgy decor and designer drugs. Since Monaco, Biarritz, Tiburon, Fifth Avenue, and Sedona were all taken, the name of a focus-group-approved hip neighborhood in Manhattan was chosen.

For the 2008 model year, the B9 part of the name was dropped and the Space Edsel snout replaced by one seemingly inspired by the Chrysler Cirrus.

Sales of the Tribeca peaked in 2006, then declined with each successive year. In 2014, Subaru gave up on the Tribeca. Five years later, we got the Ascent, which has sold pretty well.

Every Tribeca ever sold here came from the factory with an H6 engine and five-speed automatic transmission. This one is a 3.0 rated at 250 horsepower; for 2008, the engine became a 3.6 with 254 horses.

These were decent commuters with something approaching the Outback's ability to chug through snow on the way to the ski slopes (or at least a rain-soaked REI parking lot), and this example was still fairly clean and straight when it got to this place. I must assume that the engine and/or transmission failed in some extremely expensive manner.

Evade the giant ball bearings rampaging the antique-store district!

[Images by the author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next