Junkyard Find: 1959 Studebaker Lark VIII Deluxe 4-Door Sedan

Murilee Martin
by Murilee Martin

Studebakers! They're not easy to find in your local Ewe Pullet these days, since the very last ones were built in Hamilton, Ontario more than 57 years ago. I have documented a half-dozen Studes during my junkyard travels, but none of them were examples of the compact that bought the venerable South Bend company a few more years of survival: the Lark. Last week, a first-model-year Lark sedan showed up at a self-service yard just south of Denver, and I was there to document it in its final parking spot.

By the second half of the 1950s, sales of small European cars in North America—mostly Volkswagen Beetles but also machinery from Britain, France and Italy—had grown large enough to alarm American manufacturers. Newly-formed American Motors did well selling efficient Ramblers starting in 1956, and Studebaker jumped in with its own small car for the 1959 model year: the Lark.

Studebaker had been building vehicles in North America since German immigrant Peter Stutenbecker sold his first wagon in the British Province of Maryland in 1740. The first Studebaker car was an EV that went into production in South Bend in 1902.

By the 1950s, however, small manufacturers were being crushed by GM, Ford and Chrysler. A merger with Packard in 1954 didn't help, and so for 1959 the company's lineup would consist of just the Silver Hawk coupe, various slow-selling trucks and the brand-new Lark.

The data plate tells us that this car was built at the South Bend plant, fairly deep into the model year.

The firewall tag says it's a 59V Deluxe, which the Standard Catalog describes as being built only for "special order sales, Marshal sales, fleet sales and sales outside the United States."

The MSRP on the 1959 Lark VIII Regal 4-door sedan was $2,310, which comes to about $24,043 in 2023 dollars.

Meanwhile, AMC would sell you a new '59 Rambler Rebel four-door sedan with a V8 engine for $2,228 ($23,189 after inflation). A 1959 Volkswagen Beetle two-door sedan listed at $1,545 ($16,081 now). A nasty (though short-lived) recession in 1958 helped with sales of such fuel-saving machines (and helped kill the Edsel).

There were two families of Lark models for 1959, designated according to the number of engine cylinders. The Lark VI got a 170-cubic-inch (2.8-liter) flathead straight-six rated at 90 horsepower.

The Lark VIII received this 259-cubic-inch (4.2-liter) overhead-valve V8 with 180 horsepower, which made the 2,925-pound Lark plenty quick by the standards of its time. Yes, this car weighs about the same as a 2023 Honda Civic.

Studebaker had been building its V8 engine since the 1951 model year, and the supercharged 289-cube version ended up powering the famous Avanti later on.

Many, many things we think of today as necessary standard features were extra-cost options on affordable cars in 1959. For example, an engine oil filter, which in this case was this optional assembly attached to the oil-filler tube. Even a cabin heater cost extra.

With its three-on-the-tree column-shift manual transmission, this car would have attained respectable fuel economy for its era.

For an additional $200 ($2,082 today), Lark buyers could get a Borg-Warner-built "Flightomatic" three-speed automatic transmission. Air conditioning was available as well, for a stunning $325 extra ($3,383 in current bucks).

An all-transistor AM radio with the nuclear-war-ready CONELRAD frequencies marked was an $80 option ($833 now), though this appears to be an aftermarket Motorola unit. If you were willing to wait for a tube-equipped radio to warm up before tuning in the hits of '59, you could get the cheapest possible Studebaker factory radio for 61 bucks (635 bucks in 2023).

Naturally, the radio sent its sound through a tinny single speaker. Present-day readers of "On the Road" who imagine Sal Paradise and Dean Moriarty cranking up the edgy Charlie Parker at deafening volume while digging the frantic kicks on Route 36 should instead assume that they'd have been straining to decipher some squaresville sides ( e.g., Perry Como) buzzing out of a lo-fi single dash speaker and failing to punch through the road noise.

By the way, this car now resides just a few miles from the site of the now-defunct Gates Rubber plant at which a teenaged Neal Cassady (Kerouac's inspiration for Dean Moriarty) toiled prior to becoming a Beat legend. You never know what you'll learn from a Junkyard Find!

This car spent many years in the special-reserve collection of Colorado Auto & Parts, a family-owned yard that has been in operation since the late 1950s and which is known worldwide as the birthplace of the airplane-engined 1949 Plymouth pickup. CAP auctions off some of these vehicles from time to time (to make room for more), while others end up in the self-service yard.

It's rough and fairly rusty, but probably could have been put back on the road without a huge investment. Lark sedans just aren't worth much, sadly.

There are some clues about this car's past to be found here, so let's examine them.

There's a 1974 Texas registration sticker on the windshield.

Amarillo is surprisingly close to Denver (by the standards of the American West), just 430 miles to the southeast. Economy Motors was incorporated in 1959, just in time to sell this car.

Six Flags over Texas opened in the summer of 1961. I think this Studebaker moved to Colorado in the middle 1970s.

I'll bet this vintage snow tire has been with the car for most of its stay in the Centennial State.

The faded paint, ravaged interior and permanently flattened tires indicate at least a couple of decades in outdoor storage.

Most of the glass and many of the trim pieces still look to be in nice shape (note the vintage Idaho sticker), so we can hope that local Lark owners rescue all the good bits off this car before it meets The Crusher.

I'm trying to talk the local 24 Hours of Lemons racers into rescuing today's Junkyard Find and making a race car out of it. After all, there's already one Lark competing in the series.

By the 1960 model year, the Lark had what turned out to be unbeatable competition from Detroit. That was when GM introduced the Chevrolet Corvair, Ford's Falcon had its debut, and Chrysler piled on with the Valiant. The Rambler American was a great compact deal, and the Chevy II would hit dealerships just two years later. Still, the Lark managed to hang on until the very end of Studebaker, though the Lark name itself was retired in 1964.

Mister Ed says, "Tell 'em we sentcha!"

[Images: The author]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by  subscribing to our newsletter.

Murilee Martin
Murilee Martin

Murilee Martin is the pen name of Phil Greden, a writer who has lived in Minnesota, California, Georgia and (now) Colorado. He has toiled at copywriting, technical writing, junkmail writing, fiction writing and now automotive writing. He has owned many terrible vehicles and some good ones. He spends a great deal of time in self-service junkyards. These days, he writes for publications including Autoweek, Autoblog, Hagerty, The Truth About Cars and Capital One.

More by Murilee Martin

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 21 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Apr 27, 2023

    All those Roman numerals couldn't save it.

  • 3SpeedAutomatic 3SpeedAutomatic on Apr 27, 2023

    These bare bones cars like the Scotsman were that type that got you thru college or trade school. As soon as you earned your first set of regular checks, off to the dealership to ditch it and get something nice with a stereo & 8 track, A/C, power windows, seats, and brakes with a vinyl top to boot.

    The trade-in felt more like relief versus sentential loss.


  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next