2024 Chevrolet Corvette E-Ray Burns During Testing [UPDATED]

2024 chevrolet corvette e ray burns during testing


A prototype electrified Chevrolet Corvette has burned during testing.

And by "burned", I mean melted beyond recognition.

The testing was taking place in Southern Europe. Apparently, the car was one of two prototypes in the hands of supplier Bosch, and the fire occurred after it was spotted leaking oil.

As a reminder, the E-Ray isn't a full EV, but rather a hybrid setup that will use one or two electric motors to provide all-wheel drive.

No injuries were reported, and Chevrolet told Motor1 in a statement: "A Corvette development vehicle undergoing extreme testing by one of our suppliers this week had a thermal incident. All who were involved are safe as this is our top priority. We are investigating the situation with the supplier."

In the grand scheme of things, this amounts to a mildly interesting story but it doesn't mean the electrified 'Vette will be plagued by fire problems. Prototypes break all the time during testing -- it's sort of part of the process -- and one test vehicle burning does not a quality crisis make.

Still, the photos are a sight to behold. Surf over to Motor1 to see them.

UPDATE: Chevrolet has reached out to us to clarify what type of propulsion system the test mule was using. The manufacturer was a big vague, as not to give away secrets, but it's implied the E-Ray powertrain wasn't in use here. Read it for yourself: "The way the Corvette development vehicle is described in the article is not quite accurate, specifically vehicle’s the propulsion system. The car was a testing mule with a setup that’s not indicative of what an actual customer would receive."

[Image: Chevrolet]

Become a TTAC insider. Get the latest news, features, TTAC takes, and everything else that gets to the truth about cars first by subscribing to our newsletter.

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 8 comments
  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.
Next