Honda Civic Type R Teased Prior to Official Debut

honda civic type r teased prior to official debut

Honda is showing off the 2023 Civic Type R prior to its official debut on July 20th to whet global appetites.

While the manufacturer said “the camo is coming off” in its latest round teasers, the model remains heavily obscured to maintain hype before the big reveal. Though the vehicle has historically not strayed all that far from mainstream Civic variants, often adding some aerodynamic enhancements to make the Type R more stable at speed. Based on what we’ve seen of the camouflaged test mules, that looks to be the recipe once again.

Thus far, we’ve seen the high-performance compact tooling around with a body kit, sizable spoiler, and some rear fender flares. But credible rumors about the Type R’s output have encouraged the company to claim that this will be “the most powerful Honda-branded production vehicle ever offered in the U.S.”

As the 500+ horsepower Honda NSX came to our shores as an Acura product, that likely means the Civic will only have to best its predecessor’s 306 hp. But that’s still nothing to sneeze on a relatively svelte platform and Honda has historically been very good at making every pony count by focusing on offering superb handling and maximizing responsiveness. Something tells me the 2023 Civic Type R should be pretty good.

Whether it will be good enough to appease its loyal fanbase is another story, however. Despite arguably being the best front-drive vehicle to drive aggressively, some might argue that the Type R is a little pricy considering the current version retails for roughly the same price as the 450-hp Ford Mustang GT. Unless shoppers are banking on the Honda’s smaller turbocharged 2.0-liter, four-cylinder motor delivering far superior fuel economy under normal driving, it could still be a difficult sell considering the current state of the economy. Rear-drive American muscle can be had for less (especially since the Type R has a propensity to suffer from stiff dealer markups) and there’s fresh competition from the 400-horsepower Nissan Z — which retails for $39,990 before extras. Meanwhile, the brunt of Honda’s more-direct competition is slotted somewhere between the 200-horsepower Civic Si and the more-expensive Type R that’s still riding on the previous platform.

At $37,895 (again, before markups or extras) the current Civic Type R is already fairly expensive and there’s reason to believe the 2023 model year will see that number go up. We’ve heard a lot of whispering about the car going all-wheel drive and adopting a hybrid powertrain, which would help rationalize a price increase. But those rumors have been difficult to confirm and relatively easy to dismiss. Our guess is that it’ll stick with the 2.0-liter turbo and front-wheel drive. Test models would also suggest it’ll also be keeping the three-pipe central exhaust system of its predecessor, too.

We’ll learn more on July 20th when Honda yanks back the curtain. But we won’t really know if the Type R is a winner until it has been driven. As pricy as the model often looks on paper, it has historically made a solid case for itself when you start throwing gears and squealing tires.

[Image: Honda]

Join the conversation
2 of 13 comments
  • Wjtinfwb Wjtinfwb on Jul 15, 2022

    Too bad Ford gave up on the Focus RS (in the US, anyway) so quickly. These two and the VW Golf R would have made for a fun comparison with the Honda. Imagine the biased fanboy comments!

  • Tes65687949 Tes65687949 on Jul 19, 2022

    Very cool!

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.