2023 Mazda CX-50 Review – Playing Dress-Up

Fast Facts

2022 Mazda CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus AWD

2.5-liter turbocharged four (227hp @ 5,000 rpm, 310lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm on regular unleaded, 256hp @ 5,000 rpm, 320lb-ft @ 2,500 rpm on 93 octane)
Six-speed automatic transmission, all-wheel drive
23 city / 29 highway / 25 combined (EPA Rating, MPG)
10.4 city / 8.1 highway / 9.4 combined. (NRCan Rating, L/100km)
Base Price: $42,775 US / $47,431 CAN
As Tested: $43,170 US / $47,681 CAN
Prices include $1,225 destination charge in the United States and $2081 for freight, PDI, and A/C tax in Canada and, because of cross-border equipment differences, can't be directly compared.
2023 mazda cx 50 review playing dress up

Americans have got a fever, and the only prescription is more crossovers. Virtually every automaker trying to do business in this country has some sort of lifted wagon – if not a handful. Large ones, small ones, performance ones, economy ones. No convertible crossovers anymore, thank goodness. They’re shoehorning a crossover into nearly every possible market segment.

Here, we have the 2023 Mazda CX-50, with a name very much like their popular CX-5. And it’s very close in size to said CX-5. Of the six distinct non-electric vehicles offered by Mazda, four are crossovers – but why did they bring us something so very clearly similar to something they’ve been selling well for many years without replacing it?

Oh, and don’t give Mazda any ideas about a Miata crossover, please.

Mazda says the CX-50 was developed – let me get the marketing language right here – “to support the active and outdoor lifestyles of customers…” Images accompanying the press release show the CX-50 in nature – on groomed trails and adjacent to trees. Yeah, I know my photos have the car posed on a gravel lot near a river, too.

As such, the CX-50 sports additional black plastic lower body cladding. The styling beyond the plastic is distinct, too – with a bit more ground clearance and a lower roofline than the CX-5 – making the entire car look longer. I won’t deny that it’s a handsome look, especially with the wheel wells filled up with the twenty-inch wheels fitted to this Premium Plus trim.

But I’m not sure it necessarily speaks to a rugged outdoor active lifestyle. Beyond the standard all-wheel drive and the selectable drive mode with an off-road mode, I don’t see a single thing on this car that makes it any more capable where the pavement ends than your typical crossover. No skid plates, no all-terrain tires, no locking differentials.

Will the CX-50 buyer care about this? I’m not sure that they will. Because once they get behind the wheel, they’ll find a comfortable, roomy, and above all luxurious family hauler. The ride quality is superb, with minimal wind and road noise and no harshness transmitted to the cabin from impacting expansion joints. The panoramic moonroof does bring nature in just a bit should you choose.

The turbocharged engine has plenty of power to get up to speed without drama, and while the six-speed automatic is down a few cogs from some competitors, it shifts smoothly and feels very well matched to both the engine and the nature of the CX-50. The driving experience is basically identical to that of the CX-5 – which is to say, pleasant.

Infotainment is getting better from Mazda, with a display that is clearer and more snappy to respond than in years past. But it’s still commanded by a central dial near the shifter, with a couple of buttons to toggle for music or nav. Wireless Android Auto and Apple CarPlay are welcome additions.

Let’s consider, then, what should be the best comparison in the entry-luxury compact crossover market – the Lexus NX. Tim took a look at the NX 350 last week. Dimensionally, both the NX and this CX-50 are quite close inside and out – the Mazda has a slightly longer wheelbase (110.8 inches versus 105.9 for the Lexus) within roughly the same length (185.5 inches for Mazda, 183.5 inches on the Lexus). Cargo space is a win for the Mazda as well – 31.4 cubic feet behind the rear seats, versus 22.7 cubes on the Lexus.

And yet picking the entry trim of the NX 250 and simply adding all-wheel drive will run $41,025 delivered – without a number of features (like heated/ventilated seats, the moonroof, and leather) the Mazda gives on this $43,170 Turbo Premium Plus package. Matching the two up shows the value here, and the quality of the materials and appointments within the Mazda (caveat for the infotainment here) are at least every bit the equal of the Lexus.

Mazda is a luxury brand now. This is not my father’s Mazda of the GLC era, lined as it was with repurposed mouse fur. I’m sure Toyota isn’t thrilled that they’re helping to build (at the Alabama joint venture facility) such a vehicle that might make cross-shop their own premium line, but that’s how great a job Mazda has done here.

To be fair, no amount of black plastic cladding can ever make this an off-roader – not with the snazzy twenty-inch wheels and low-profile tires fitted here. That’s ok – the slight nod toward off-road fashion is like that one nice pair of running shoes I once bought, thinking I might get off the couch and start running to lose some weight. Nope. They’ve been relegated to very comfy lawn-mowing sneakers – and at least until they turned green, they looked good doing so.

With the 2023 CX-50, Mazda is leaning in hard to court those who imagine themselves with an active and outdoor lifestyle. Whether it succeeds is a question yet to be answered.

[Images: © 2022 Chris Tonn]

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 40 comments
  • Jeff Waingrow Jeff Waingrow on Jul 11, 2022

    I've read some reviews that make a point of saying that the CX-50's ride is quite stiff and unforgiving. You liken it to that of the CX-5, but on my 2021 with 19" wheels, the ride is quite good. I've noticed in many reviews at this site, ride quality is often given short shrift. I think it matters to a large number of people who don't enjoy bouncing around.

    • See 1 previous
    • Sobhuza Trooper Sobhuza Trooper on Jul 14, 2022

      Ride quality may be related to the tires. Those 20" need a low-profile to fit. I suspect that the standard 17" tires provide a noticeably nicer ride. Too bad those cars are flogged to the reviewers by the Mazda PR people.

  • Sobhuza Trooper Sobhuza Trooper on Jul 14, 2022

    Ride quality may be related to the tires. Those 20" need a low-profile to fit. I suspect that the standard 17" tires provide a noticeably nicer ride. Too bad those cars are flogged to the reviewers by the Mazda PR people.

  • Sgeffe Bronco looks with JLR “reliability!”What’s not to like?!
  • FreedMike Back in the '70s, the one thing keeping consumers from buying more Datsuns was styling - these guys were bringing over some of the ugliest product imaginable. Remember the F10? As hard as I try to blot that rolling aberration from my memory, it comes back. So the name change to Nissan made sense, and happened right as they started bringing over good-looking product (like the Maxima that will be featured in this series). They made a pretty clean break.
  • Flowerplough Liability - Autonomous vehicles must be programmed to make life-ending decisions, and who wants to risk that? Hit the moose or dive into the steep grassy ditch? Ram the sudden pile up that is occurring mere feet in front of the bumper or scan the oncoming lane and swing left? Ram the rogue machine that suddenly swung into my lane, head on, or hop up onto the sidewalk and maybe bump a pedestrian? With no driver involved, Ford/Volkswagen or GM or whomever will bear full responsibility and, in America, be ambulance-chaser sued into bankruptcy and extinction in well under a decade. Or maybe the yuge corporations will get special, good-faith, immunity laws, nation-wide? Yeah, that's the ticket.
  • FreedMike It's not that consumers wouldn't want this tech in theory - I think they would. Honestly, the idea of a car that can take over the truly tedious driving stuff that drives me bonkers - like sitting in traffic - appeals to me. But there's no way I'd put my property and my life in the hands of tech that's clearly not ready for prime time, and neither would the majority of other drivers. If they want this tech to sell, they need to get it right.
  • TitaniumZ Of course they are starting to "sour" on the idea. That's what happens when cars start to drive better than people. Humanpilots mostly suck and make bad decisions.
Next