The End of Leaded Gasoline, Lessons to Remember

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Prior to 1970, buying leaded gasoline in the United States was as normal as picking up a carton of eggs or relaxing in your asbestos-laden home. After 1970, the U.S. Congress had officially adopted the Clean Air Act created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the gradual phasing out of leaded fuel began. While many bemoaned the lackluster performance of the malaise-era automobiles that followed, the rules continued to inform how vehicle manufacturers operated on a global scale.

But leaded gasoline hung in there for longer than you might assume. Most Western nations (including the United States) didn’t totally phase out leaded gasoline intended for passenger vehicles until the 1990s. Central Asia took even longer and parts of the Middle East and Africa continued to offer lead additives well into the 2000s. However, the United Nations Environment Program announced that leaded gasoline had officially become extinct over the summer, with Algeria being the final country to deplete its now-banned supply.

In 2002, the United Nations organized a coalition of African governments and oil companies to stop using the fuel citing that modern engines don’t benefit from it in the same manner as older vehicles had. Leaded gas is pretty much a death sentence for a catalytic converter. But the primary push came by way of addressing the health risks associated with burning leaded fuel. The U.N. was forced to play a long game but appears to have been successful in its objective. With the possible exception of North Korea, it’s now assumed that leaded gasoline has been more or less abolished around the world.

At this point in the article, you’re probably wondering why you should care that some North African country with a shoddy human-rights record finally banned the least popular fuel blend.

Well, the history of leaded gasoline does offer us a potential timeline for the next regulatory bonanza. It took the world roughly 50 years to finally nullify lead in fuel, even after there was little practical reason to keep it around. But even then, there remain exceptions in agricultural equipment, racing vehicles, marine engines, and some aircraft. The next big shift will be electrification, which is encouraging similar governmental bans and will require substantially more work to accomplish.

While the automotive sector seems happy swapping over to electric vehicles — as they require less manpower to build and allow the industry to mimic the behavior of cell-phone providers — there are major logistical issues that need to be addressed. Energy grids will need to be fortified to handle peak draw in the afternoons without incurring additional pollution if the environmental claims being made by EV advocates are to be taken seriously. We’re going to need to figure out ways of mining materials necessary for battery production without incurring more pollution or allowing certain nations (specifically China) to monopolize the market. Robust charging infrastructures need to be established and the relevant technologies need to be improved so EVs can be truly comparable to combustion vehicles.

Developed countries are already working on the above as governing bodies attempt to predict which year they can officially ban internal combustion vehicles. But if the history of leaded gasoline has taught us anything, it’s that the global timeline could be a lot longer than anyone realizes. Despite the brunt of the planet’s population possessing reliable access to electricity, there are some noteworthy exceptions in the developing world.

Only about 45 percent of Hattians have access to electricity. Meanwhile, African countries like Chad, Niger, the Congo, Liberia, Somalia, and Rwanda can only dream of such widespread electrification. The good news is that all of those nations’ power availability are trending upwards. But there’s no assurance that will always be the case. War-torn Libya has seen its access to electricity plummet over the last two decades and analysts are worried the same could soon be true in Afghanistan unless China’s Belt and Road Initiative comes to the region.

The above isn’t a plea to abandon electrification programs, just a statement of fact that governments and industry leaders often seem to ignore. Recent strides in battery technology really do make it seem as though EVs will become the future of transportation whether or not it’s to your tastes. However, the quoted timelines often seem short-sighted and completely ignore places like Africa where the vast majority of vehicles are secondhand and need to be able to run on gasoline or diesel to effectively traverse the countryside.

But spurring electrification that isn’t even the most immediate automotive issue for the region. Having effectively ended the use of leaded fuel in Africa, the U.N. would now like to see it start working on lessening the amount of sulfur present in the continent’s diesel fuels. Considering how long it took for leaded gasoline to be removed from the picture (blame the pollical climate, technological gaps, tough financial situations), this could likewise take decades and genuinely leaves us wondering if it’s even possible to see EVs become Africa’s dominant mode of transportation in our lifetime.

[Image: Abd Pini Bidin/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 30 comments
  • Jeff S Jeff S on Sep 08, 2021

    There is not a shortage of oil but there will be a shortage of refined products like gasoline and diesel as more and more countries mandate the adoption of non-fossil fuel in vehicles and electrical generation. Additionally there has not been a major oil refinery built in the USA since the mid 70s and more and more refineries have been taken off line. It will take years before EVs replace ICE but eventually it will happen.

  • Slavuta Slavuta on Sep 09, 2021

    "Libya has seen its access to electricity plummet over the last two decades" hmmm. Libya was the richest African country with the highest standard of living before US/France destroying it. "why you should care that some North African country [Algeria]" -Because they ship great dates to US. I buy it at Home Goods. -Because their national soccer team is a kick-a$$ -Because when enough of them live in France, they will just unite the two places

  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
  • Bill Wade I was driving a new Subaru a few weeks ago on I-10 near Tucson and it suddenly decided to slam on the brakes from a tumbleweed blowing across the highway. I just about had a heart attack while it nearly threw my mom through the windshield and dumped our grocery bags all over the place. It seems like a bad idea to me, the tech isn't ready.
Next