Lucid Motors Becomes an Automaker

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Production of the 2022 Lucid Air started this week, adding another automaker to the North American roster. The manufacturer held an event on September 28th, inviting Arizona Governor Doug Ducey, relevant executives, big-time investors, select media outlets, and customers who dropped $170,000 to purchase the limited Dream Edition of the electric vehicle.

While often framed as a Tesla ripoff, Lucid Motors has been setting its sights so high that it hardly feels like a fair assessment. Because the Air is offering one of the most impressive all-electric spec sheets in the industry right now and should probably worry the competition.

“The proprietary EV technology that Lucid has developed will make it possible to travel more miles using less battery energy. For example, our Lucid Air Grand Touring has an official EPA rating of 516 miles of range with a 112-kWh battery pack, giving it an industry-leading efficiency of 4.6 miles per kWh. Our technology will allow for increasingly lighter, more efficient, and less expensive EVs, and today represents a major step in our journey to expand the accessibility of more sustainable transportation,” Peter Rawlinson, CEO and CTO of Lucid Group, said at the event. “I’m delighted that production cars endowed with this level of efficiency are currently driving off our factory line.”

With manufacturing duties split between the Advanced Manufacturing Plant (AMP-1) and nearby Lucid Powertrain Manufacturing (LPM-1), the company thinks it should be able to commence deliveries in October. However, that will be limited to the 520 all-wheel-drive Dream Edition cars people paid extra for. The Range variant offers 520 miles on a single charge while the Performance model is said to offer an operating area of 451 miles and enough horsepower to breeze through a quarter-mile in 9.9 seconds at 144 mph.

Next on the production docket will be the 800-hp Lucid Air Grand Touring ($139,000).

Lucid said it currently has around 13,000 reservation holders, though its survival will hinge on its sales performance after those deliveries are handled and it has to focus on base (which will be rear-drive only) and mid-trimmed cars. While the manufacturer has said those models won’t have the same charging capacities as cars boasting higher MSRPs, everything is supposed to yield a maximum range in excess of 400 miles and retain DC fast-charging capability. Customers will also get three full years of free access to Electrify America charging stations.

All in all, it’s sounding quite good for Lucid. But we’ll have to wait and see if it can maintain momentum and reach the same heights that Tesla has. Lucid Motors has made some bold assertions about the future and it could be undone if has to break a bunch of promises regarding the lesser trims or quality control becomes an issue. This is a brand-new automaker, after all.

But things are looking up for the time being and the company is even considering subsequent vehicles. AMP-1 is supposed to begin production of an all-electric SUV using much of the same technology that’s gone into the Air. Its launch has tentatively been scheduled for sometime in 2023.

[Images: Lucid Motors]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 24 comments
  • Imagefont Imagefont on Oct 01, 2021

    Tesla is the Starbucks of electric cars, and there is only room for one. This company will not duplicate their success even if the product is superior, because that’s not why people by Teslas. Ford and GM won’t have that kind of success either, regardless of the product. These second comers will have to get by on their merits, price and value. And $100,000+ cars do not represent good value in any way shape or form. But good luck anyway!

  • El scotto El scotto on Oct 01, 2021

    Uh, what will they do when Lexus/Mercedes/JLR come out with their EV flagships? Technical competence, history, and cachet sell those three. An upstart EV built in a factory that should be made into GM's Shrine To Mediocrity will be a hard sell to those who lease a six-figure vehicle.

  • CEastwood I have a friend who drives an early aughts Forrester who refuses to get rid of it no matter all it's problems . I believe it's the head gasket eater edition . He takes great pains regularly putting in some additive that is supposed prevent head gasket problems only to be told by his mechanic on the latest timing belt change that the heads are staring to seep . Mechanics must love making money off those cars and their flawed engine design . Below is another satisfied customer of what has to be one of the least reliable Japanese cars .https://www.theautopian.com/i-regret-buying-a-new-subaru/
  • Wjtinfwb 157k is not insignificant, even for a Honda. A lot would depend on the maintenance records and the environment the car was operated in. Up to date maintenance and updated wear items like brakes, shocks, belts, etc. done recently? Where did those 157k miles accumulate? West Texas on open, smooth roads that are relatively easy on the chassis or Michigan, with bomb crater potholes, snow and salt that take their toll on the underpinnings. That Honda 4 will run forever with decent maintenance but the underneath bits deteriorate on a Honda just like they do on a Chevy.
  • Namesakeone Yes, for two reasons: The idea of a robot making decisions based on algorithms does not seem to be in anyone's best interest, and the thought of trucking companies salivating over using a computer to replace the salary of a human driver means a lot more people in the unemployment lines.
  • Bd2 Powertrain reliability of Boxer engines is always questionable. I'll never understand why Subaru held onto them for so long. Smartstream is a solid engine platform as is the Veracruz 3.8L V6.
  • SPPPP I suppose I am afraid of autonomous cars in a certain sense. I prefer to drive myself when I go places. If I ride as a passenger in another driver's car, I can see if that person looks alert and fit for purpose. If that person seems likely to crash, I can intervene, and attempt to bring them back to attention. If there is no human driver, there will probably be no warning signs of an impending crash.But this is less significant than the over-arching fear of humans using autonomous driving as a tool to disempower and devalue other humans. As each generation "can't be trusted" with more and more things, we seem to be turning more passive and infantile. I fear that it will weaken our society and make it more prone to exploitation from within, and/or conquest from the outside.
Next