Ford Postpones On-Site Work Until 2022, Considers Vaccine Mandates

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Wednesday, Ford Motor Co. told employees that it would delay plans for on-site work due to coronavirus concerns relating to the delta variant. Non-site-dependent staff are being told they stay home for the rest of 2021, while line workers will still be required to come in so long as there’s a job to be done — creating a dichotomy between white and blue-collar workers.

While Ford has encouraged some teams to come back to the office for various projects, it has repeatedly delayed its return-to-work timeline. Workers now being told to stay home until 2022 were previously informed they’d be coming back to the office in October. Before that, everyone thought it would be business as usual by the summer. Now the company is adopting a policy that has most people staying home even after 2022 as often as possible while it considers mandating vaccines.

Normally, this is something you’d expect unions to pipe up about and some are. Line workers are effectively being forced to come in and may be subjected to vaccinations in order to keep their jobs while office staff can remain home indefinitely. But the UAW has been on board with whatever COVID restrictions automakers wanted to impose since day one. It even cosigned most of the early proposals as part of the joint automotive task force designed to help manage the pandemic response.

While your author earnestly believes many of the people championing these types of restrictions are doing so with good indentions, the fact remains that it’s much more affordable for a company not to pay for office space it no longer needs. Ford has already said it’s been redesigning its facilities accommodate fewer people on-site and, according to Automotive News, the brunt of those efforts is going toward shrinking offices and giving employees more shared workspaces — which is going to save them a bundle.

From AN:

“The nature of the work or project will guide arrangements that employees and their people leaders decide on in collaboration,” Ford said in a statement. “For example, a team may decide to come into the office two times per week for a project that needs face-to-face collaboration, while working remote the other days, or there may be a sprint where employees are needed on-site for one full week, then work from home the rest of the month. Coming on-site will be for the purpose of collaborative work.”

The company on Wednesday also informed workers of a new arrangement where it will allow non-site-dependent employees to work for up to 30 days per year from an alternate location within their country of employment. That would allow employees with a vacation home or who were visiting family out-of-state to continue working with no expectation to be on-site at a Ford facility.

We’re inclined to think that vaccine mandates are next and Ford has already confirmed it’s been considering them. But it also stated that it wants to assess how employees might respond and what the legalities of such a mandate would be in various countries. There have also been monumental levels of pushback relating to new COVID restrictions that marginalize the unvaccinated or those objecting to compulsory vaccine IDs. Europe has seen months of protests after various nations instituted vaccine passports and there’s a coalition of truckers in Australia that now refuse to deliver goods while lockdowns continue. There has likewise been opposition forming in the United States, as various cities and corporations introduce pandemic protocols that are even more restrictive than what we originally endured.

Considering that Blue Oval isn’t even sure how legal it is to foist vaccines on staff at the global level and everyone is starting to seem pretty mad about the prospect, it’s probably wise to tread lightly here. Bank of America was already being boycotted for handing over customer data to the FBI and people are now doubling down after it said it would be requiring all employees get vaccinated unless they wanted to be fired — though it’s hardly alone. Amtrak, AT&T, BlackRock, Capital One, Cardinal Health, Cisco Systems, CNN, Delta Airlines, Facebook, Frontier Airlines, Google, Lyft, McDonald’s, Microsoft, Morgan Stanley, Uber, Walt Disney, Washington Post, and many other companies have introduced similarly stringent vaccine ID requirements within the last month.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
9 of 123 comments
  • JD-Shifty JD-Shifty on Aug 26, 2021

    some of these goobs are right health care shouldn't be tied to your employer. we should have govt healthcare

    • See 2 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Aug 27, 2021

      I could trust the government... But not the American government... to manage a healthcare. But really, there is no government that managed it well. Germany, may be closest one. Best results achieved where there is a combination of government and private. But the story of the gov. healthcare is all the same - you might wait for procedures for months. There is no perfect solution. Especially in America, considering cost of education and doctor salary expectations

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Aug 27, 2021

    Those who do not get the vaccine and get Covid-19 don't have to worry about any side effects of the vaccine if they die.

    • See 3 previous
    • Slavuta Slavuta on Aug 27, 2021

      @jkross22 It is a religion with Stalin, Obama and Mao as gods. BTW, Stalin visited his mother after he became the top man. She asked him, "what you do these days". He said, "remember, we used to have a czar? I do his work now."

  • Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
  • Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
  • Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
  • NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
  • Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.
Next