The Right Spec: 2022 Ford Maverick

Matthew Guy
by Matthew Guy

Thanks to all of you who welcomed this new series when it appeared on your digital screens last week. Experiments can fall flatter than that can of 7Up you left out overnight, and we’re glad this one made the cut.

Given the BnB’s propensity for small pickup trucks with blue ovals on the grille (remember Sajeev’s understandable but slightly terrifying infatuation with his last-gen Ford Ranger?), the new Maverick makes a perfect foil for the second entry in The Right Spec series of posts.

Ford is making a lot of noise about Maverick’s base price just sneaking in under 20 large before the inevitable destination fee. However, there’s a case to be made that anything with an open truck bed (no matter its overall length) should be able to tow more than a utility trailer filled with a few bags of soil. Upgrading the base XL trim to include Ford’s 2.0L EcoBoost engine increases the price to $21,080 but brings more pulling power to those underhood horses. This is a sum of $1,200 less than the non-EcoBoost XLT truck, by the way.

Someone deep within the bowels of the Glass House must have imbued people in charge with more than a few grains of sense since the so-called ‘4K Tow Package’ is available as a $725 stand-alone option that doesn’t require the selection of a sunroof or coffee maker or annual subscription to Mad Magazine (and yes, we know Mad ceased publishing; our tepid joke stands). It includes a trailer hitch receiver with a 7-pin harness, an oil cooler for the transmission, and a snazzy high-capacity radiator. With it, the Maverick can tow 4,000 pounds.

The company also has the intelligence to offer more than sad-sack greyscale colors on the XL, including the Velocity Blue shown here. An 8-inch infotainment screen, LED headlamps, and automatic emergency braking are all part of the deal. About the only further recommendation your author will make is to consider the optional sliding rear window, a feature that greatly increases a truck’s functionality in certain cargo situations and provides a bit of ventilation for us old guys who miss the days of vent windows. We must note the caveat that Ford forces the selection of CoPilot360 (because lane-keeping has so much to do with a sliding rear window).

This brings us neatly to a pre-destination price of $21,875 for a mini-truck with a 54-inch open bed and the capability to tow 4,000 pounds. Considering inflation, that would be equivalent to splashing out $11,750 on a new-for-’93 Ranger pickup. Base price of a two-wheel-drive Ranger SuperCab XL that year? Precisely $11,775 before a smattering of options, netting you a truck far less powerful and lavishly equipped than today’s Maverick.

Are we right on the money this week? Sound off below.

Please note the prices listed here are in American dollars and currently accurate for base prices exclusive of any fees, taxes, or rebates. Your dealer may (and should) sell for less (obscene market prices notwithstanding). Keep your foot down, bone up on available rebates, and bargain hard.

[Images: Ford]

Matthew Guy
Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 67 comments
  • GoFaster58 GoFaster58 on Jun 21, 2021

    I plan on trading my 2018 Ram for the new Maverick. Ford screwed up by stopping production of the old Ranger.

  • Armadamaster Armadamaster on Sep 20, 2021

    How many different "small" trucks does Ford have to make to do what the old Ranger did by default?

  • Theflyersfan I used to love the 7-series. One of those aspirational luxury cars. And then I parked right next to one of the new ones just over the weekend. And that love went away. Honestly, if this is what the Chinese market thinks is luxury, let them have it. Because, and I'll be reserved here, this is one butt-ugly, mutha f'n, unholy trainwreck of a design. There has to be an excellent car under all of the grotesque and overdone bodywork. What were they thinking? Luxury is a feeling. It's the soft leather seats. It's the solid door thunk. It's groundbreaking engineering (that hopefully holds up.) It's a presence that oozes "I have arrived," not screaming "LOOK AT ME EVERYONE!!!" The latter is the yahoo who just won $1,000,000 off of a scratch-off and blows it on extra chrome and a dozen light bars on a new F150. It isn't six feet of screens, a dozen suspension settings that don't feel right, and no steering feel. It also isn't a design that is going to be so dated looking in five years that no one is going to want to touch it. Didn't BMW learn anything from the Bangle-butt backlash of 2002?
  • Theflyersfan Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Hyundai, and Kia still don't seem to have a problem moving sedans off of the lot. I also see more than a few new 3-series, C-classes and A4s as well showing the Germans can sell the expensive ones. Sales might be down compared to 10-15 years ago, but hundreds of thousands of sales in the US alone isn't anything to sneeze at. What we've had is the thinning of the herd. The crap sedans have exited stage left. And GM has let the Malibu sit and rot on the vine for so long that this was bound to happen. And it bears repeating - auto trends go in cycles. Many times the cars purchased by the next generation aren't the ones their parents and grandparents bought. Who's to say that in 10 years, CUVs are going to be seen at that generation's minivans and no one wants to touch them? The Japanese and Koreans will welcome those buyers back to their full lineups while GM, Ford, and whatever remains of what was Chrysler/Dodge will be back in front of Congress pleading poverty.
  • Corey Lewis It's not competitive against others in the class, as my review discussed. https://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/cars/chevrolet/rental-review-the-2023-chevrolet-malibu-last-domestic-midsize-standing-44502760
  • Turbo Is Black Magic My wife had one of these back in 06, did a ton of work to it… supercharger, full exhaust, full suspension.. it was a blast to drive even though it was still hilariously slow. Great for drive in nights, open the hatch fold the seats flat and just relax.Also this thing is a great example of how far we have come in crash safety even since just 2005… go look at these old crash tests now and I cringe at what a modern electric tank would do to this thing.
  • MaintenanceCosts Whenever the topic of the xB comes up…Me: "The style is fun. The combination of the box shape and the aggressive detailing is very JDM."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're smaller than a Corolla outside and have the space of a RAV4 inside."Wife: "Those are ghetto."Me: "They're kind of fun to drive with a stick."Wife: "Those are ghetto."It's one of a few cars (including its fellow box, the Ford Flex) on which we will just never see eye to eye.
Next