Report: Ford to Build Standalone Bronco Stores

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

If you have Bronco on the brain, you may find yourself buying one from a store that stands separate from your local Ford dealer.

A report in Automotive News says that some dealers plan to open standalone Bronco stores. The story further reports that the idea came from dealers, not the manufacturer. Ford did create renderings for how the stores look, at the dealers’ request, and will give those dealers who open a store a slightly larger allotment of Broncos.

Only about 100 dealers out of the approximately 3,300 Ford stores in the U.S. seem to be planning on building the Bronco stores so far. They will be mostly connected to existing dealerships or located nearby, and they will use the Bronco’s horse logo instead of the Ford blue oval.

It’s likely that other variants of the Bronco nameplate will be sold at these stores. That would mean the full-size Bronco and the already on-sale Bronco Sport compact in the near term, plus any further offshoots in the future.

Perhaps not coincidentally, Jeep is planning what AN says is “hundreds” of standalone showrooms of its own. This makes sense, as your author has heard via the industry grapevine that Jeep wants to position the upcoming Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer as a subbrand.

The Bronco stores will likely be 3,800 square-foot buildings with an outdoor fire pit, indoor wall for accessory, and enough space to display three vehicles. There will be black paneled siding, gray stone for the entrance, and wood accents on the exterior. Very outdoorsy.

At least one dealer, who is no doubt biased, seems excited. From AN: “It’s an announcement to the world we’re back; the Bronco is back,” Tim Hovik, owner of San Tan Ford in Gilbert, Az., said. “It’s such an iconic product that in an absolute way, we feel a Ford dealer is really adding almost an additional franchise.” Hovik is also the chairman of Ford’s national dealer council.

Ford wants to make clear that it’s optional for a dealer to build one of these stores. Andrew Frick, Ford’s U.S. sales boss, told AN that Ford has three ways for dealers to put the spotlight on the highly anticipated off-roader. One is the separate store, of course. Another would be an expansion of the existing showroom. Finally, dealers could simply add displays to a showroom.

“So we have an option for pretty much any budget, and as we’ve repeated several times, it’s all strictly optional,” he told Automotive News.

That bit about the stores being optional is important. It’s almost an afterthought in the AN piece, but the story notes that Ford will NOT be requiring dealers to spend money on upgrading facilities in order to sell Broncos.

Instead, those who have the budget can choose to do so.

If you’re curious to see the renderings, browse over to AN, if you have a sub.

[Image: Ford]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 46 comments
  • Thornmark Thornmark on Apr 13, 2021

    paging Mandy Lee they need Bronco Bars and Barbecue Pits would work better than the Cadillac bar in nyc

  • Jmrtsus Jmrtsus on Apr 13, 2021

    So the true headline is "Some Ford dealers MAY build separate buildings to sell their Bronco's." Not a thing in this article other than the headline says FORD is building them.

  • Redapple2 UAW may have a valid issue. I ve been in plants that were bad. ....and i greatly dislike the UAW. I may need a 3/4 ton pick up. It will be a hecho Ram gas.
  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
Next