Automotive Industry Begs U.S. Government for Money

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

With President Biden planning to announce an infrastructure proposal that could easily exceed $2 trillion, the automotive industry has come to the realization that some of that money could be used to make its job easier. Following Tesla’s attempt at charming the federal government into making carbon credits more valuable, automotive lobbies, supplier groups, and the United Auto Workers (UAW) union have issued a joint letter asking for financial assistance.

Addressed to the president and congress, the document makes numerous requests for help with electric vehicle adoption rates. Industry groups would like to see Biden sign onto significant government tax incentives and subsidies for both buying and manufacturing electric vehicles. But this isn’t limited to passenger cars, they also want tax dollars used to help offset the prices corporations pay on commercial EVs intended for fleet use. Government grants would likewise be set aside for organizations that retool facilities for electric cars, while federal entities make a vow to buy up new fleets that aren’t reliant on liquid fuel.

The letter — available for your perusal here — was signed by Alliance for Automobile Innovation CEO/President John Bozzella, UAW President Rory Gamble, and Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association CEO/President Bill Long.

One of the biggest issues among its authors was the low number of EVs currently on American roadways. Despite 4-wheeled electrics having technically been around since 1832, the letter notes that only about 1.5 million of the 278 million passenger cars registered in the United States are battery-driven. They felt that could be improved via the aforementioned subsidies and a comprehensive federal education program designed to sway the public perception.

While we’re not particularly enthralled with the idea of the state advertising for automakers that it’s also funneling money into, there were some more reasonable suggestions. The document makes mention of the importance of the U.S. finding ways to procure, process, and recycle the materials necessary for battery production — noting that most of that work is currently being done in Asia. It also acknowledges the charging infrastructure isn’t currently at a point where all drivers can realistically expect to use EVs without making huge compromises regardless of where they live. The letter estimated that there are currently 100,000 public charging outlets nationwide and speculated that figure would need to surpass the 500,000 Biden proposed while campaigning for there to be mainstream acceptance. Obviously, the lobbying groups would like to see the Biden infrastructure plan spending some of the money set aside for bridges and roadways on setting up a more robust charging network.

But the UAW, which saw its leadership signing onto the general premise of the letter, has signaled fears that mishandling EV promotion could ultimately cost American jobs. This has been happening with unions operating in Europe as well since many are under the impression that jobs will be lost as electrification becomes more dominant. EVs require fewer moving parts to build and, with so much of the battery work being done in other regions, some unions have become very worried.

Interestingly, the document sent to the White House and congressional leadership blatantly states that the market is lagging behind their desired results. But it posits that the problem can be socially engineered — ultimately providing an opportunity for the nation to enhance its global competitiveness and economic security.

“Neither the current trajectory of consumer adoption of EVs, nor existing levels of federal support for supply- and demand-side policies, is sufficient to meet our goal of a net-zero carbon transportation future,” read the letter.

Biden is expected to release his infrastructure plan (which many are now claiming will exceed $3 trillion) on Wednesday.

[Image: Whitehouse.gov]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 36 comments
  • Cdrmike Cdrmike on Mar 31, 2021

    People have voted themselves out of a free market economy (or at least, as close as we could manage to one) and into some gubment run social experiment, chock full of the feels. The historical record is not favorable.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Apr 01, 2021

      ^^ This. The Ds and Rs compete to see who can provide the most handouts to their constituents - individual and corporate - and there seems to be little difference year after year. Don't even think about touching Social Security - it will *never* run out of money. Now we count the "one-time" spending (or is it "stimulus"?) bills by the trillions instead of billions. I'm 57; my kids and their kids and their kids will be paying for this stuff forever. "No" is a foreign concept in government today.

  • JEFFSHADOW JEFFSHADOW on Apr 04, 2021

    Just let me know when there is a hydrogen engine for my 1974 Toronado. I am fine with the government using my tax dollars to re-invent the 455!

  • Wjtinfwb Ford can produce all the training and instructional videos they want, and issue whatever mandates they can pursuant to state Franchise laws. The dealer principal and staff are the tip of the spear and if they don't give a damn, the training is a waste of time. Where legal, link CSI and feedback scores to allocations and financial incentives (or penalties). I'm very happy with my Ford products (3 at current) as I was with my Jeeps. But the dealer experience is as maddening and off-putting as possible. I refuse now to spend my money at a retailer who treats me and my investment like trash so I now shop for a dealer who does provide professional and courteous service. That led to the Jeep giving way to an Acura, which has not been trouble free but the dealer is at least courteous and responsive. It's the same owner group as the local Ford dealer so it's not the owners DNA, it's how American Honda manages the dealer interface with American Honda's customer. Ford would do well to adopt the same posture. It's their big, blue oval sign that's out front.
  • ToolGuy Nice car."I’m still on the fill-up from prior to Christmas 2023."• This is how you save the planet (and teach the oil companies a lesson) with an ICE.
  • Scrotie about 4 years ago there was a 1992 oldsmobile toronado which was a travtech-avis pilot car that had the prototype nav system and had a big antenna on the back. it sold quick and id never seen another ever again. i think they wanted like 13500 for it which was steep for an early 90s gm car.
  • SunnyGL I helped my friend buy one of these when they came in 2013 (I think). We tried a BMW 535xi, an Audi A6 and then this. He was very swayed by the GS350 and it helped a lot that Lexus knocked about $8k off the MSRP. I guess they wanted to get some out there. He has about 90k on it now and it's been very reliable, but some chump rear-ended it hard when it was only a few years old.From memory, liked the way the Bimmer drove and couldn't fathom why everyone thought Audi interiors were so great at that time - the tester we had was a sea of black.The GS350's mpg is impressive, much better than the '05 G35x I had which could only get about 24mpg highway.
  • Theflyersfan Keep the car. It's reliable, hasn't nickeled and dimed you to death, and it looks like you're a homeowner so something with a back seat and a trunk is really helpful! As I've discovered becoming a homeowner with a car with no back seat and a trunk the size of a large cooler, even simple Target or Ikea runs get complicated if you don't ride up with a friend with a larger car. And I wonder if the old VW has now been left in Price Hill with the keys in the ignition and a "Please take me" sign taped to the windshield? The problems it had weren't going to improve with time.
Next