Ford Calls Out Suppliers for Leaks

Tim Healey
by Tim Healey

The good ship Ford has been quite leaky lately. And the automaker is pinning the blame on its suppliers.

Images of the Bronco, Bronco Sport, and Maverick compact pickup have all leaked before those vehicles were introduced (the Maverick, of course, has not yet been unveiled, while the other two have). These images have hit forums — and we’ve sourced those forums for some of our own reporting.

So, naturally, Ford put out a memo, and it was shared with Automotive News. It’s unclear who shared it with the industry-centric publication.

“We cannot underscore enough the negative impact of these unfortunate actions on our collective business results, and we ask for your support to personally follow the confidentiality guidelines inherent in Ford’s Global Terms & Conditions,” Ford said in the memo. It was signed by Jonathan Jennings, the company’s vice president for global commodity purchasing and supplier technical assistance. “Ford has a zero-tolerance policy for leaks emanating from our own team members, and we need all supplier personnel to adopt a similar approach regarding unauthorized disclosures of Ford confidential information.”

Further, Ford set out to make it clear to suppliers that any advantages Ford may have over the competition could be “severely diminished or eliminated altogether through malicious or careless disclosure of confidential information.”

Ford doesn’t allow photos or video of prototypes before official launch. Regardless of whether the vehicle is camouflaged or not, or otherwise covered.

That’s common in the industry — yours truly has had stickers placed over his cell phone’s camera at various visits to automaker properties. Of course, Ford’s rules don’t stop spy photographers, random citizens, and journalists out and about town from trying to snap shots of vehicles testing on public roads. Agreements to not sneak pics don’t apply in the wild.

It’s worth noting, of course, that some of these leaks appeared to come from within plants and other production facilities.

Subcontractors are supposed to abide by Ford’s rules, and Ford apparently singled out Tier 1 suppliers. The company reminded them that they have a “responsibility to have a robust leak prevention plan. Because the damage to our organizations can be significant, Ford will treat confirmed supplier security breaches with heightened scrutiny. Suppliers could face business repercussions and even recovery actions for damages tied to leaks caused or enabled by suppliers.”

AN reached out to Ford and an unnamed spokesperson said the company was: “reinforcing to suppliers and partners, as we have to our own employees, the importance of following strict policies and protocols to protect confidential information.”

Of course, leaks will never be fully stopped. Our experience in 2019 is a reminder of that.

[Image: Ford]

Tim Healey
Tim Healey

Tim Healey grew up around the auto-parts business and has always had a love for cars — his parents joke his first word was “‘Vette”. Despite this, he wanted to pursue a career in sports writing but he ended up falling semi-accidentally into the automotive-journalism industry, first at Consumer Guide Automotive and later at Web2Carz.com. He also worked as an industry analyst at Mintel Group and freelanced for About.com, CarFax, Vehix.com, High Gear Media, Torque News, FutureCar.com, Cars.com, among others, and of course Vertical Scope sites such as AutoGuide.com, Off-Road.com, and HybridCars.com. He’s an urbanite and as such, doesn’t need a daily driver, but if he had one, it would be compact, sporty, and have a manual transmission.

More by Tim Healey

Comments
Join the conversation
6 of 11 comments
  • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 20, 2021

    "Show us how gravely negative a few photos leaking is to your business" For once, I agree with you..... OMG...Me agreeing with EBflex and Biden as president...the world must be coming to an end. LOL

    • See 3 previous
    • Lou_BC Lou_BC on Jan 22, 2021

      @EBFlex You seem to take it seriously until you get called out.

  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Jan 21, 2021

    “Ford has a zero-tolerance policy for leaks emanating from our own team members, and we need all supplier personnel to adopt a similar approach regarding unauthorized disclosures of Ford confidential information.” Why do Ford's inner workings sometimes remind me of Scientology?

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next