U.S. Subcompact Car Market Share Fell by Half Since 2016; Subcompact Crossover Segment Tripled Since 2013

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

No Yaris. No Fiesta. No Sonic. No Mazda2. No Fit.

America’s subcompact car segment is decimated. According to Tyson Jominy, the vice president of data and analytics at J.D. Power, 40 percent of last year’s subcompact sales are gone. Jominy doesn’t mean “fewer sales.” He means that the nameplates responsible for 40 percent of the sales are gone.

And is it any wonder? As recently as 2014, subcompact cars produced 3.8 percent of all U.S. auto sales. Collectively, the few remaining subcompact cars now account for just 1.4 percent of the American light vehicle market.

At the current rate of decline, fewer than 1 percent of the vehicles sold in America in 2022 will be subcompact cars. But we all know the current rate of decline is hardly an accurate harbinger. If subcompacts own 1 percent of the market in 2021, we’d be surprised.

Subcompact crossovers are hardly the only factors at play in the decline of subcompact cars. True, there’s an industry-wide shift from passenger cars to SUVs and crossovers, whether it’s Camry-to-RAV4, 3 Series-to-X3, or Impreza-to-Crosstrek. But beyond prevailing winds, subcompact cars also painted themselves into a corner.

Take fuel economy as an example. The most efficient Honda Fit and the most efficient Honda Civic will both cost $75 to run, the EPA says. What about actual payments? According to Toyota.com, leasing the least costly automatic-shift 2020 Corolla Hatchback will cost a grand total of $73 more less per month than the least costly 2020 Yaris Hatchback.

In other words, subcompact cars are typically less refined than compact cars. They’re usually slower. They’re rarely as nicely equipped. To counteract their demerits, subcompact cars offer the unique privilege of draining bank accounts at a more rapid rate.

Oh, the joy of tight turning circles.

Regardless of their own inadequacies, subcompact cars were selling at reasonable levels. Between 2012 and 2016, there were nearly 600,000 annual subcompact car sales in America, on average. 2015, however, represented a major swing in the market. It was the first time subcompact crossovers sold in greater numbers than subcompact cars. And there was no going back. Subcompact crossover market share (not including the Rogue Sport that Nissan folds into total Rogue volume) will soon be twice as strong as it was in 2015; subcompact cars will soon generate less than one-third the share they produced in 2015.

The shock-to-the-system of a pandemic-altered first-half did the dwindling subcompact car market no favors in early 2020. The ensuing incentives, such as interest rate drops that obviously lend far more favor to more costly products, have done virtually nothing to spur sales of America’s smallest cars. As auto sales fell 24 percent overall in 2020’s first six months, subcompact cars were down 51 percent, greater than twice the rate of decline.

Subcompact crossovers, meanwhile, lost only 7 percent of their volume while the overall market tumbled at more than three times the rate.

The die is cast.

[Images: Nissan, Hyundai]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Driving.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars and Instagram.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 22 comments
  • JLGOLDEN JLGOLDEN on Aug 17, 2020

    It seems that the 2013 Buick Encore was the pioneer in the "tiny SUV/CUV" class. It brought unforeseen customers into GM showrooms, and it had little competition for a while. Primitive as the Encore seems now, it's still a strong seller, when the deal is sweetened with generous discounts. The tiny CUVs are loved because of the refreshing combination of hatch utility, a slightly elevated seating position, and a relatively nimble handling feel.

  • ABC-2000 ABC-2000 on Aug 17, 2020

    Funny that Mazda, after many years, decided to bring the 2 to the US just to see it parked for a long time on dealer lots, even Toyota could not sale many of them in Yaris form.

    • SoCalMikester SoCalMikester on Aug 18, 2020

      they really werent marketed, even as the scion iA it was a 4 door, and most people will just step up to a corolla.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next