FCA, PSA to Be Probed Deeply Ahead of Merger

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Executives from Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) and PSA Group are reportedly concerned that their companies are in for an extensive probing by the European Commission before their planned merger can take place. Ideally, the duo have said they want to finalize the deal early in 2021, but the prolonged investigative dive may force them to readjust that timeline.

The European Union has historically been a big fan of antitrust investigations and often tries to predict future business actions to address how newly formed organizations might impact the market overall. It’ll be a difficult task, what with automotive sales suppressed by coronavirus lockdowns and the global economy looking particularly grim.

Few are under the impression that the merger will be blocked, however.

“Regulatory approval of Fiat Chrysler-Peugeot’s tie-up is still likely, given potential antitrust concerns are small compared with the deal’s size,” Bloomberg Intelligence analyst Aitor Ortiz said this week. “They may be addressed with remedies. These concerns should send the deal to a phase-two review.”

From Bloomberg:

Fiat and PSA didn’t take a chance to try to settle antitrust concerns with an early-stage offer that had to be submitted by Wednesday. The EU has a June 17 deadline to clear the deal unconditionally or open the extended investigation.

The companies agreed in December to create the world’s fourth-biggest automaker. They have so far kept the deal afloat through the course of the coronavirus pandemic’s immense disruption to auto factories and dealerships around the globe.

Longer probes can be beneficial by allowing companies to argue for fewer concessions, or to hammer out more complicated divestments or changes to licensing or distribution. The EU often only accepts a clear-cut sale as a quicker solution to its concerns.

Despite a truly ugly 2020, PSA and FCA remain committed to their $50-billion agreement to join forces. The EU, however, may have some concessions waiting for them based on European market overlap of some subsidiaries — mainly as it relates to small cars and vans.

According to Ortiz, the two company’s combined market share of mini cars and subcompact crossovers could end up being 65 percent. That, as well as other aspects of the merger, will likely encourage the European Commission to enact a “phase-two” investigation that could push its early-stage offer deadline (July 17th) all the way to October. Ultimately, it may also force PSA and FCA to postpone everything. The upside is that it gives them time to negotiate with regulators, potentially getting more of what they want. The downside is that it opens them both up to more concessions if the EU doesn’t like what it sees.

Neither automaker has commented on the matter; nor do they really need to. PSA boss Carlos Tavares has already said that everything will be done to ensure the deal moves forward.

“Whatever we have to discuss or modify, we will,” he noted in February.

[Image: afapress/Shutterstock]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 11 comments
  • Akear Akear on Jun 11, 2020

    I don't like the idea that a French company will be larger than GM. The US auto industry has fallen behind the Germans, Japanese, and South Koreans. Now it looks as if the French are pulling ahead as well. The way things are going I would not be surprised if GM is in 7th place in a decade.

  • Jeff S Jeff S on Jun 12, 2020

    I don't care at this point GM has brought this upon themselves and is either headed for the dustbin or Chinese ownership. The French Government will more likely mess up FCA with their interference and make the original Fiat merger appear to be not so bad. The French overall make lousy cars.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next