After the Gold Rush: Rolls-Royce Ready to Embrace Minimalism

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

We’ve covered how mainstream automakers rose to the coronavirus challenge ad nauseum, but what about companies whose customers dream of rich mahogany and yachting off Cannes all night?

Well, just like a Silicon Valley tech mogul, Rolls-Royce spent these past few months reflecting, peering deep within its soul, all to learn how to become a better friend to its clients. Apparently, “post-opulence” is now a thing.

Speaking to Autocar, RR’s chief designer, Alex Innes, said the brand’s Bespoke division — tasked with crafting the ultimate expressions of personal luxury — has noticed a change among its customers.

“Not being able to meet clients in person has been challenging, but we’ve worked around it and we’ve continued to be in near-constant dialogue with them,” Innes said.

“The benefit the lockdown has afforded us is the currency of time to contemplate and reflect – and we’ve noticed a similar trend with our clients. They’ve had more time to really think and engage with the coachbuild process. I’ve had lots of video chats with them to obsess over little details.”

Okay, but where does the assertion come from that people with endless money to spend on a tailor-made automobile have altered their exacting tastes?

Innes addresses that:

“There has been a slight change in attitude and behavior, building on a trend we’ve recognized for some time but which has accelerated since the coronavirus. We’ve termed it ‘post-opulence’: clients in the wider luxury sphere are coming to question the substance of things and what is necessary.”

According to the designer, brash status symbols are out, and thoughtful luxury is in. Guess RR will have to discontinue the Cullinan, then.

“There’s a shifting attitude to cars, which is reflected in a shift to a more minimalist aesthetic,” Innes continued. “Clients don’t want the opulence and ornateness of yesterday: they want a new type of luxury, with more purity. It’s about real attention to detail, towards higher and more exacting standards.”

No, Rolls-Royce hasn’t decided to give Nissan a run for its money at the low end of the market. In this sense, minimalism needn’t mean spartan or plain. And certainly not pedestrian. Perhaps a good American representation of what Innes is angling at is the changeover from the 1960 Continental to the ’61.

As the Bespoke division’s commands come from clients’ wishes, neither it nor Rolls plans to craft such “minimalist” vehicles from the ground up, at the factory. It’s up to buyers to outfit existing vehicles in whatever manner they choose. The car is the canvas, Innes said. Bespoke just adds the paint.

And that’s your PSA on how gauche, ornate, Baroque trappings are falling out of favor at the absolute pinnacle of the new car market. Use that knowledge wisely.

[Image: BMW Group].

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • Bob Bob on Jun 30, 2020

    Looks like they're going to poach the interior designer of the Tesla Model 3 and Y. Simpler and more restrained.

  • Lightspeed Lightspeed on Jun 30, 2020

    I wish I were rich enough to be post-opulent.

    • Lie2me Lie2me on Jun 30, 2020

      I just bought a Roller with three on the tree and crank windows, just $5000 a month for 84 months. What a bargain :)

  • Jeff One less option will be available for an affordable midsize sedan. Not much can be done about GM discontinuing the Malibu. GM, Ford, and Stellantis have been discontinuing cars for the most part to focus on pickups, crossovers, and suvs. Many buyers that don't want trucks or truck like vehicles have moved onto Japanese and South Korean brands. Meanwhile large pickups and suvs continue to pile up on dealer lots with some dealers still adding market adjustments to the stickers. Even Toyota dealers have growing inventories of Tundras and Tacomas.
  • Lorenzo This car would have sold better if there was a kit to put fiberglass toast slices on the roof.
  • Lorenzo The Malibu is close to what the 1955 Bel Air was, but 6 inches shorter in height, and 3 inches shorter in wheelbase, the former making it much more difficult to get into or out of. Grandma has to sit in front (groan) and she'll still have trouble getting in and out.The '55s had long options lists, but didn't include a 91 cubic inch four with a turbo, or a continuously variable transmission. Metal and decent fabric were replaced by cheap plastic too. The 1955 price was $1765 base, or $20,600 adjusted for inflation, but could be optioned up to $3,000 +/-, or $36,000, so in the same ballpark.The fuel economy, handling, and reliability are improved, but that's about it. Other than the fact that it means one fewer sedan available, there's no reason to be sorry it's being discontinued. Put the 1955 body on it and it'll sell like hotcakes, though.
  • Calrson Fan We are already seeing multiple manufacturers steering away from EVs to Hybrids & PHEVs. Suspect the market will follow. Battery tech isn't anywhere close to where it needs to be for EV's to replace ICE's. Neither is the electrical grid or charging infrastructure. PHEV's still have the drawback that if you can't charge at home your not a potential customer. I've heard stories of people with Volts that never charge them but that's a unique kind of stupidity. If you can't or don't want to charge your PHEV then just get a hybrid.
  • AZFelix The last time I missed the Malibu was when one swerved into my lane and I had to brake hard to avoid a collision. 1 out of 5⭐️. Do not recommend.
Next