Rare Rides: The 1986 Chrysler Town & Country Wagon - Adventures in Vinyl

by Corey Lewis

Published: May 4th, 2020

rare rides the 1986 chrysler town country wagon adventures in vinyl

Rare Rides previously featured the last rear-drive Town & Country wagon, a model closely related to the sturdy and reliable M-body Dodge Diplomat. Today’s wagon is a sign of its times: It’s front-drive, efficient, and based on the K-car platform (like 98 percent of Chrysler’s offerings for the years 1981 through 1995).

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

The M-body seventh-generation LeBaron Town & Country linked above was a short-lived product offering. Available only between 1978 and 1981, its short life came down to changing fortunes at Chrysler. By the early Eighties, ChryCo was out of money, launching minivans, and in the midst of switching up the rest of its product to front-drive.

After the 1981 run of rear-drive Town & Country wagons, the Chrysler factory at Newark, Delaware switched its production line over to front-drive K cars. All eighth-generation Town & Country wagons were made in Newark, bearing model years between 1982 and 1988.

The luxurious Town & Country wagon shared its panels with the new and plebeian LeBaron wagon, but maintained exclusivity via copious vinyl wood cladding like in prior Town & Country generations. There was also a Town & Country convertible, which marked the first time that badge graced a drop top since 1968.

Town & Country vehicles used the same four-cylinder engines as found in other K cars, which ranged in displacement from 2.2- to 2.6-liters. All engines were Chrysler-sourced apart from the 2.6, which was donated by Mitsubishi. Unique for an American-branded wagon, a turbocharger was also available on the 2.2-liter engine. The only transmission offered was a three-speed automatic.

By 1988 the family wagon was on the way out, mostly due to the minivan offerings Chrysler pioneered in North America. After one last hurrah, the Town & Country wagon disappeared permanently. No vehicle used the name in 1989, but in 1990 a new type of vehicle wore the Town & Country badge: a minivan. And it kept the wood paneling, too.

Today’s Rare Ride is for sale in Cincinnati. With just 58,000 miles traveled since 1986, it’s about as clean as they come. A knowledgeable dealer seemingly attributes the Town & Country as the ultimate K-car (wrong) and the car which saved Chrysler (also wrong), and asks $9,995.

[Images: seller]

#1980s #1990s #Chrysler #ChryslerTown&Country #ChryslerTownAndCountry #ClassicCars #FamilyCars #KCars #NewsBlog. #RareRides #StationWagons #Wagons #Town&Country

Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 30 comments

HotPotato on May 05, 2020

Remember the massive rear end sag on these things, even when new? Apparently 1980s bumper height requirements only applied to the front, because lots of cars, including the 1980s VW Scirocco, had the low-rider look: nose pointed to the sky with 4x4 fender gap, tail pointed to the ground and seemingly riding on the bump stops.

Like Reply
28-Cars-Later on May 06, 2020

I'm sure its clean for its age but what was the intended lifespan of one of these out of the gate? 80K? I realize no one is really going to be DD'ing this but I wonder if this isn't museum grade (which I don't think it is) who is buying this for any reasonable amount of money let alone the insane $10K stickered?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.