Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Has Ford Humming a Sad Tune

by Steph Willems

Published: April 20th, 2020

copyright infringement lawsuit has ford humming a sad tune

Did Ford rip off someone else’s playlist? The answer to this question will emerge from a courtroom, now that the owner of a vast digital music catalog has filed a lawsuit against the automaker.

The copyright infringement suit, filed late last week, accuses Ford of improperly using 54 songs in its marketing materials over the span of several years.

As reported by The Detroit News, Freeplay Music LLC stakes claim to a massive catalog of songs. The litigant in this affair, New York-based FPM, owned by theme song and jingle composer Scott Schreer, says some 74 digital Ford adverts or promotional materials sourced tunes from the catalog without paying for their use.

The lawsuit states, “This is an action for willful copyright infringement by a multibillion dollar company too cheap to secure licensing before commercially using registered works owned by another company.”

Heading the legal action are two heavy hitters. Howard Hertz (Hertz Schram PC) and Richard Busch (King & Ballow Entertainment Law) filed the lawsuit on Schreer’s behalf, with the latter of the duo known for the famous “Blurred Lines” lawsuit filed on behalf of the late Marvin Gaye’s estate.

It looks like the suits was a long time coming. Apparently, Schreer made Ford aware of its transgressions back in 2017, with his legal representatives claiming the copyright infringement continued until as late as last Thursday. The litigant seeks $150,000 for each infringement — a stiff ask that takes the wealth of the defendant into consideration.

“Finding these infringements is akin to finding a needle in a haystack. (Ford) apparently counted on the difficulty of being caught in deciding to engage in this massive willful copyright infringement,” Schreer’s lawyers wrote.

[Image: Ford]

#Advertising #CopyrightLaws #Ford #LawAndOrder #Lawsuit #Marketing #Music

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

4 of 9 comments

Flipper35 on Apr 21, 2020

Sounds like a Prenda but music instead of porn.

Like Reply
- Mike-NB2 on Apr 21, 2020
  
  I was going to say the same thing. This smacks of a copyright troll.
  
  Like
NeilM on Apr 21, 2020

So not nearly as entertaining as Prenda!

Like Reply
- Flipper35 on Apr 21, 2020
  
  Will have to see how it plays out, it could be if they get Judge Otis!
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Daniel J This thing is just too big and not packaged great being RWD. I'd prefer a FWD/AWD pre 2024 Santa Fe sized vehicle. A true CX-70.
Ash78 Now that we're on the topic, I think Apple owes us all a ton of money for bringing out new phones every 1-2 years and devaluing the one I have! /sDepreciation has always been a part of car ownership, far more so now if you're getting into EVs. I think it's just the discrete nature of these depreciation events (ie, price cuts) that have everyone wringing their hands.I'm too price sensitive -- not necessarily to BUY an EV -- but for the fear of what a truly disruptive battery tech might do to them. Split the differene with a hybrid or PHEV and you've reduced your car's reliance on battery tech as the primary determinant of value.
Ash78 Interesting take on the pricing...superficially illogical, but Honda has been able to sell the Pilot Junior (er, Passport) for more than the Pilot for several years now. I guess this is the new norm. I have 2 kids, who often have friends, and I feel like the best option here is buying the CX-90 and removing the third row completely. It won't be pretty, but it adds useful space. We've done that in our minivan several times.I've been anxiously awaiting the 70 for over a year, but the pricing makes it a non-starter for me. I like the 50, but it's tight (small, not dope/fire/legit); I like the 90s, but it's more than we need. This "Goldilocks Solution" feels like it's missing the mark a little. Mazda could have gone with more of a CX-60 (ROW model) and just refreshed it for the US, but I suspect the 90 was selling so well, the more economical choice was just to make it the same basic car. Seems lazy to me.
FreedMike If you haven't tried out the CX-90, do so - it's a great driver, particularly with the PHEV powertrain.
Ajla I don't understand why it is priced above the CX-90 (about $2500 at every trim level on the I6 and $5k on the PHEV), unless a CX-90 price increase is on the way soon. It will be interesting to see how this does against the CX-90, that one isn't packaged well for a 3-row but with a lower price, very similar exterior styling and identical exterior dimensions I'd lean towards it over the 70. The pricing on higher trims is a bit dear for a nonpremium badge and it is annoying that Mazda and the press pretend that the lower nonS trims don't even exist. Why even bother making them if you won't take it to your own media event?I would expect the engine and chassis configuration to be a killer app here but it seems like engine/transmission is only 80% baked and the interior is what sells these. Reliability is a big question mark as well. In the end outside of a specific buyer (this seems like something Corey would like), I'd recommend getting something cheaper and more established.