Overlooked, but Not Forgotten: The 2021 Chevrolet Traverse
Lost in the madness of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic this week was the debut of a refreshed version of General Motors’ largest crossover, the Chevrolet Traverse.
The full-size, three-row people hauler enters the 2021 model year with updated front and rear styling, along with notable changes in content. Let’s take a closer look at this generously sized non-minivan.
For 2021, The Traverse takes a hint from its body-on-frame brothers, donning slimmer LED headlamps and a revised grille. It makes for a less dainty look, what with the Traverse’s thicker lower bumper, wider side scoops, and LED running lights partially encircling the round fog lights. Those peepers are LED on all trims, as are the revised tail lamps.
Sadly, GM would only give us a partial look at the lofty High Country and Premier trims, with nothing said of powertrain changes. Chevy recently ditched the 2.0-liter turbo four-cylinder powerplant, leaving the model with a standard 3.6-liter V6 and eight-speed automatic. It’s expected that this will continue.
The two top-end trims receive GM’s safety alert seat system as standard kit, preventing young ones from being left in a potentially hot car. Just how content breaks down over trim lines is still hazy, though GM mentions an available 8-inch driver information display, and advanced adaptive cruise control available on 3LT, RS, and Premier. One can assume it’s standard on High Country.
Throughout the trim ladder, Traverse buyers will benefit from a standard suit of driver-assist features; among them, automatic emergency braking, front pedestrian braking, lane keep assist with lane departure warning, forward collision alert, auto high beams, and following distance indicator. No mention of blind spot monitoring or rear cross-traffic alert, which GM generally relegates to option packages on all but the highest trim.
Bummer.
Apple CarPlay and Android Auto connectivity is also listed as available. Elsewhere, the Traverse gains four new wheel options, two of which can be seen in these pics, as well as wireless device charging and USB ports in all three rows.
More details, including pricing, will arrive closer to the 2021 Traverse’s late-2020 on-sale date.
[Images: General Motors]
More by Steph Willems
Latest Car Reviews
Read moreLatest Product Reviews
Read moreRecent Comments
- Orange260z I'm facing the "tire aging out" issue as well - the Conti ECS on my 911 have 2017 date codes but have lots (likely >70%) tread remaining. The tires have spent quite little time in the sun, as the car has become a garage queen and has likely had ~10K kms put on in the last 5 years. I did notice that they were getting harder last year, as the car pushes more in corners and the back end breaks loose under heavy acceleration. I'll have to do a careful inspection for cracks when I get the car out for the summer in the coming weeks.
- VoGhost Interesting comments. Back in reality, AV is already here, and the experience to date has been that AV is far safer than most drivers. But I guess your "news" didn't tell you that, for some reason.
- Doc423 Come try to take it, Pal. Environmental Whacko.
- 28-Cars-Later Mazda despite attractive styling has resale issues - 'Yota is always the answer.
- 28-Cars-Later Try again.
Comments
Join the conversation
My favorite crossover. I have driven CX-9, Highlander, Ascent, Flex, Sorento and Explorer -- Traverse is so much better than any of them. It has a distinctive European car feel. The ride is quiet, comfortable and smooth with that distinct buttoned down feeling of a European car. The steering is great, the seats are very comfortable. It is quick enough with relatively good throttle response. The brakes are so-so. The second row is extremely roomy and the third row is comfortable enough for adults on a 1000 mile trip. The large 22 gal fuel tank lengthens the time between fuel stops. It has more cargo space behind its third row than most competitors. I have only driven the FWD version. I dislike the feel of AWD, so I tend to test drive 2WD versions.
I have the GMC version of this platform from a prior year, and what a P-O-S. Typical half-baked 5/8th GM engineering effort and cost-cut to death. Now worth half of the Toyota I should have bought at that time. I want a driver-assist feature that gets me my money back.