Adventures in Marketing: The Welcome Return of Body Damage

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Automakers go to great pains to show off their vehicles in the best possible light. Via the deft touch of their respective marketing teams, ordinary machines suddenly grow the ability to do the impossible: getting the hopelessly nerdy guy his dream girl, soothing inconsolable babies, and performing feats of strength that would leave even Frank aghast.

In official pictures and film, the worst fate to befall a vehicle is normally an artistic splattering of mud around the wheel wells. Perfection is always a car wash away.

Not so in the “ad” just released by Jaguar Land Rover, which piggybacks on the exploits of a filmmaking team and gives them all the marketing support they ask for in return. Despite JLR using a Bond movie to its benefit, it’s good to see a vehicle being put to its full potential in a commercial — and sustaining damage in the process. It harkens back to those old Volvo ads of yore, in which abuse factors heavily.

Titled “Unstoppable,” the Land Rover Defender spot features the filming of scenes from the upcoming flick No Time to Die, the plot of which surrounds Bond’s post-spy career as a salesman struggling to make ends meet in the highly competitive SUV market.

I think.

The takeaway from this torture-a-thon is that the returning Defender can impact the ground at an alarming nose-down angle and drive away without catastrophic damage to its linkages. None that we can see, anyway. Are these Defenders completely stock, you ask? Of course not. As the fine print on a related website states, “Vehicles modified for stunt work: Defender features extreme duty roof, front beams and undertray; roll cages; safety fuel cell. Non-production seats and belts, engine cooling, tyres and ride-height.” I’d like to hear more about the ride height modifications.

The finale of the clip shows the model performing a half barrel roll, impacting on its hood and roof and coming to rest upright, front fender and hood crumpled. It then drives off, front passenger-side tire rubbing the now-exposed wheel well liner. Your real-world experience will, of course, vary.

Anyway, it’s great stuff for viewers who demand a visceral demonstration of what their life could look like in an OEM’s latest ride. Great, as well, because vehicle marketing is so often tame with a capital “T.” No puppies, kids, friends, or spouse in sight here.

Yes, JLR wouldn’t be putting a Defender through these kinds of paces were it not for the movie, but product placement in a film can be even better than a marketing campaign — assuming the movie isn’t a box office turkey. Think of the Dodge Ram extended cab in Twister or the unbelievable torture test endured by the (apparently stock) Ford pickup in the Charles Bronson flick Mr. Majestyk. Ford made hay out of that appearance, and it wasn’t even a new model!

As stated before, the JLR spot is a more entertaining and cinematic take on those old Volvo commercials, which started off with angry drivers beating the shit out of their Amazons and ended with stately 760s launching off the roof of buildings. Overseas, customers were treated to a dance, and a very Eurocentric one at that.

Other automakers should think about breaking free from the mold, leaving picture-perfect locales, pristine paintwork, and CGI behind.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover/YouTube]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
12 of 18 comments
  • -Nate -Nate on Feb 20, 2020

    Amazingly, y son actually drives his 4X4 like this on a regular basis and cracks the frame and breaks springs and so on.... Looks like I'll go see this movie, I hope it's any good . -Nate

  • Conundrum Conundrum on Feb 20, 2020

    Nope. A leap of the imagination too far. I highly doubt the Defender is a minivan, despite Hummer's derision for anything but blacksmith technology. You might not have noticed, but the Defender is longitudinal engine not transverse where the ZF 9 speeder is used, not only in Chryslers, but also Acura TLX, Acura MDX and the Odyssey.

    • See 9 previous
    • Theshed Theshed on Oct 13, 2020

      @Hummer "it’s not going 10% of the places a stock wrangler will go. Off-roading requires a very straight forward setup. Only in your imagination can this ever be considered a capable off-road vehicle." You must be joking, Right ? The wrangler has the advantage of ground clearance and probably suspension travel but put it in real rough stuff. Mud, hills, sand the Defender will be towing it home. Agreed, this new Defender has far to much electrickery but these days that is what you get and it will get you where you need to be.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next