QOTD: Willing Spirit, Weak Flesh?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Yesterday, the awe-inspiringly tall Matthew Guy asked about examples of daily drivers that achieved stratospheric odometer readings, which immediately catapulted this writer back to the middle of the previous decade — a better era for most things, save vehicle design.

Back then, your author’s beloved Camry Coupe was still running like a dream at 261,000 miles. Nary a drop of oil lost between changes. Repairs? Nonexistent. Bliss can truly exist outside of heaven. It was a happy coincidence that Guy’s post occured on the same morning that Murilee showed us an indestructible five-cylinder Benz diesel; truly a paragon of longevity.

Yet for every high-mileage champion, there’s a vehicle that gives up well before its time — wheezing to a stop before the finish line is in sight. Perhaps you’ve owned one?

We all hope and pray that our current ride goes the distance but, like your childhood vision of owning an ice cream factory, such dreams are often unrealistic. While I had hoped that my previous vehicle would soldier on well past its paid-off date, that was not to be. With coolant consumption reaching alarming levels, I hastily traded in Cruze 1.0 in order to recoup any measure of my initial investment. Blame might lie on a full-loss wintertime coolant dump that occured years earlier, and for an unknown period of time. There was a cold snap, a hose came loose following a dodgy repair, it’s a long story.

So, off it went to the auction at 129,000 miles. Not happy, this owner was. Now, before you place the blame solely on the decision to purchase a GM throwaway, the previous three low-rent GM sedans I’d owned were still running fine at 150,000+ miles. (Fingers crossed on Round Five…)

Despite its name being a stand-in for cheap reliability, my sister’s long-gone 2003 Honda Civic developed fatal engine and transmission issues at a ridiculously (for the model) low miles. It was a 1.7-liter/five-speed combo, if you’re curious. I don’t think the Civic made it to 125k before she ditched it in favor of something that wasn’t a grenade-in-waiting.

When a looming repair (or repairs) stand to cost the owner more than the car is worth, dropping the thing like a hot potato is the only acceptable course of action.

Comb those memory banks, B&B. We’ve talked indestructible hand-me-downs, now let’s talk turds. Did one of your vehicles give up the ghost long before its supposed best-before date? What was the odometer reading?

[Images: Chrysler, Honda]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 73 comments
  • Dividebytube Dividebytube on Dec 18, 2019

    My dad's 1984 (?) Oldsmobile 98 with the ill-fated diesel engine. It was a beautiful car with white leather, factory CB radio, power everything, and... slow as molasses. Diesel engine went at ~60k miles of mostly highway use. My dad had a gas engine put in - and the transmission promptly fragged while I was driving it to a job interview. After that experience he went right to the Nissan dealership and bought a Stanza. A drop down in size and Brougham-ness but the reliability difference - woah! Me? I've owned a few used cars that were cheap and overly abused so I won't begrudge them too much. The Taurus wagon with the slipping transmission, the Saturn SL that burned oil like a sieve, the Volvo 850 with the ticking rockers, the Honda Accord coupe with the slipping transmission. Argh!

  • Formula m Formula m on Dec 18, 2019

    A Honda Civic your sister felt she needed to get rid of at 125,000 miles or = 200,000kms ??? That's about when a vehicle gets expensive to replace the many wear items or rust kills it in Canada My parents bought a new 2001 Pontiac Montana sport when I left for college. I came home 2 years later it had 68,000kms (42,000 miles) It had been pressure tested many times for water leaks under warranty with no fix. The interior was a rattle trap from the cottage roads. The leaking head gasket at 42,000mi was enough to trade it on a Nissan Maxima. Other than used 4x4 trucks no one in the Family bought another GM product. I even worked for GM during college co-op in 2004-2005 and in Sales for GM from 2007-2009 until the bankruptcy

  • Lorenzo Yes, more sedans, but NOT "four-door coupes" with low, sloping rooflines. There's a market: The Malibu sold only 39,376 in 2021, but 115,467 in 2022, and130,342 last year. Surely GM can make money at that volume, even though it's the 4-D-C design. Auto executives need to pay less attention to stock price and more to the customers.
  • 1995 SC The sad thing is GM tends to kill cars when they get them right, so this was probably a pretty good car
  • Mason Had this identical car as a 17 year old in the late 90's. What a ball of fun, one of many I wish I still had.
  • FinnEss At my age, sedans are difficult to get into without much neck and hip adjustment.I apologize sincerely but that is just the way it is. A truck is my ride of choice.Pronto
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
Next