Platform Watch: With Merger Pact, Fiat Chrysler Looks Forward to PSA Underpinnings

by Steph Willems

Published: December 18th, 2019

platform watch with merger pact fiat chrysler looks forward to psa underpinnings

In the binding merger agreement signed Wednesday, Fiat Chrysler and PSA Group claim platform and technology sharing will account for 40 percent of the combined entity’s annual cost savings.

While the agreement made passing mention of two pieces of PSA architecture — platforms that will one day make up a full two-thirds of the merged company’s volume — nothing more was said of that particular plan. Still, it’s something worth talking about.

According to industry sources who spoke to Automotive News Europe, the two wonder platforms are PSA’s CMP and EMP2 architecture, which form the basis of most of the automaker’s small-to-midsize lineup, underpinning a range of hatchbacks, sedans, and crossovers from the Citroen and Peugeot brands.

Obviously, it will take a while for FCA to adopt its partner’s platforms; that two-thirds figure won’t come to fruition for years. While PSA made quick use of its new small and midsize platforms after taking Opel and Vauxhall off GM’s hands, existing FCA models will have to run their course.

The most obvious application for the French automaker’s architecture is in the Fiat stable, which is still a big player in the European market. Given that it’s a low-priced brand, this is an area where FCA would like to save on development costs. While the next-generation 500 city car (a segment FCA seems fairly uninterested in) is already on the way, future Fiats with larger footprints could swap to the PSA platform, no problem.

Fiat’s small car platforms also underpin a number of Jeep models, so expect a switchover for future generations of Compass, Cherokee, and Renegade. Overseas, Jeep plans to introduce an “ultra compact utility vehicle” for 2022; this model could make use of a PSA platform, if development isn’t too far advanced.

The struggling Alfa Romeo brand, relegated to back-burner status in a recent revision of FCA’s five-year product plan, stands to gain from the French, too. While nothing is confirmed, the small SUV slated to appear in late 2022 could don a PSA platform.

PSA is a good dance partner for FCA, as its architectures were designed to accommodate a range of propulsion types — from ICE-only to hybrid and plug-in hybrid, and even fully electric. An electrification plan is already underway at Jeep, Alfa, and Maserati.

Elsewhere in the American lineup, existing architecture is the only path forward. At least for the foreseeable future, that is, until joint platforms rear their heads. Ram’s truck line isn’t about to borrow anything from PSA’s current parts bin, nor are the rear-drive, LX-platform Dodges or the BOF Jeep Wrangler and Gladiator. Same goes for the next-generation Jeep Grand Cherokee and its upcoming three-row stablemate, as well as the incoming BOF Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer.

[Image: Chris Tonn/TTAC, Fiat Chrysler]

#Architecture #Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #FutureModels #Merger #Platforms #ProductPlanning #PSA #PSAGroup

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 27 comments

Forward_look on Dec 18, 2019

I had a Neon that leaked oil like a Rover.

Like Reply
Akear on Dec 18, 2019

Can the French teach FCA how to build a decent car?

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.