Dodge Charger GT Copies Its Brother, Dons AWD

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

For a model seemingly older than the domestication of plants and animals, the Dodge Charger manages to foist new things at its intended audience every year. Same goes for its two-door sibling, the Challenger.

For 2020, the Charger offers something the Challenger debuted for the 2018 model year: a GT model with four-wheel grip.

Hardly earth-shaking Charger news, sure, but one day, perhaps early in the new decade, there might actually be an LX-platform announcement of greater potency. In the meantime, we can look at what a Charger GT AWD gets you — the answer to that question being “not much,” aside from upgraded looks and a loftier sticker price.

While Challenger adopted all-wheel drive on its GT model two years ago, Dodge saw fit to relegate the system to its base Charger SXT. Like Challenger, GT sits one rung up the trim ladder from SXT, sharing the same 3.6-liter Pentastar V6 and eight-speed automatic as the entry-level car. Power amounts to 300 horses and 264 lb-ft of torque.

Truth be told, the GT does improve upon the SXT’s inherent visual muscularity in a number of ways. The front fascia is revised to look meaner. LED foglamps appear, as do side sills. The hood is a performance covering. A tastefully low-profile spoiler appears out back, though 19-inch aluminum wheels still fill the wells with 235/55 all-season performance rubber (RWD GTs offer 20-inch wheels as standard).

Inside, you’ll find a performance wheel and seats with additional bolstering — the latter coming in handy should you choose to enter the vehicle in a winter rally. Slipping the vehicle into Sport mode ensures that the AWD system won’t have to wait until it detects front-end slip before sending power forward.

And yes, you can fully defeat the system and its associated electronic nannies for messy parking lot snow donuts.

The 2020 Charger GT AWD carries an after-destination starting price of $36,490, which is a not-too-insignificant jump from the RWD GT’s opening bid of $33,390. However, contrast it with the SXT AWD and the difference is more than halved. That model starts at $35,090.

Orders open for Charger GT AWDs in January, with deliveries expected before the end of March.

[Images: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 18 comments
  • Bumpy ii Bumpy ii on Dec 15, 2019

    I have one sitting in a closet, mostly because I don't feel like blowing half a day taking the module to the dealer and trying to get a replacement without going through a full install.

  • Ltd1983 Ltd1983 on Dec 16, 2019

    "inherent visual muscularity" Ugh. Remember the Aston Martin Vantage Volante "Prince of Wales" edition? He wanted the high performance version without the wheel arches, flares & spoilers; and it was so popular Aston made more for customers. That's what I want. A Charger Hellcat "Prince of Wales" Edition. No scoops, spoilers, or body kit. Just a plain SXT with 700+ hp.

  • JK Savoy Blue is a thing, but Sestriere White? Sestriere is a ski town near Turin, so I guess it meant to conjure up thoughts of snow. Pretty car. I hope Pininfarina has success. The industry in and around Turin has taken a big hit and is a shadow of its former self.
  • Ravenuer My 2023 CRV EX, 6 mo old, 4800 miles: $0.
  • TheEndlessEnigma My '16 FiST: Oil changes, tires, valve cover gasket (at 112k miles), coolant flush, brakes.....and that's itMy '19 Grand Caravan: Oil changes, coolant flush
  • John Clyne I own a 1997 GMC Suburban that I bought second hand. It was never smoked in but had lost the new car smell when I got it four years after it was sold new. I own a 2005 Chevrolet Avalanche & that still has the new car smell. I like the smell. I could never afford a new car until the Avalanche. It might be my last new car? Why do they build cars with fire retardant materials in them. Smoking rates are falling & if someone continues to smoke in this day & age is a fool especially with all the information out there.
  • Theflyersfan Non-performance models, probably the Civic based on the fact the interior feels and looks better in the Honda. Both of them are going to drive like adequate appliances with small engines and CVTs and get decent mileage, so this is based on where my butt will rest and things my hands and fingers will touch.Toyota doesn't have an answer to the Civic Si so the Honda wins by default.CTR vs GR Corolla. One dealer by me is still tacking on $10,000 markups for the CTR and good luck with the GR Corolla and the "allocation" system. There's that one dealer in Missouri that I pasted their ad a while back wanting $125,000 for a mid-level GR. Nope. But cars.com is still showing markups. Both of these cars will have little depreciation for a while, so the markups equal instant loss. It looks like Cincinnati-area dealers are done with CTR markups. So this is a tough choice. I don't like the Corolla interior. It looks and feels inexpensive. I'm glad Honda toned down the exterior but the excessive wing still looks immature for such an expensive car that 20-somethings likely cannot afford. FWD vs AWD. With price being an object, and long-term maintenance a thing, I'd go with the Honda with a side eye at the Golf R as a mature choice. All with stick shifts.
Next