Remember 'Road Rover'? It Hasn't Gone Away

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Just over two years ago, a tentative product name discovered deep within Jaguar Land Rover’s internal communications captured the eye — and stimulated the fertile imaginations — of auto journos everywhere. “Road Rover” was a name JLR was using to describe a possible future vehicle; a year later, the automaker moved to trademark the name for safekeeping.

Since then, JLR has grappled with financial pain born of the decline of both diesel propulsion and the sedan bodystyle, choosing to fight market trends by shoring up its Land Rover division with new or updated utility vehicles, returning the Defender nameplate to the top of the line, and cutting build configurations of its Jaguar passenger cars. Parent company Tata Motors wants results, and it wants them in a hurry.

One thing not lost to the automaker’s evolving product strategy is Road Rover. There’s more news on that front.

Autocar, which first broke the Road Rover story, has added to earlier claims that the vehicle would boast some measure of off-road capability and make an appearance in 2020. It now seems the Road Rover, clearly destined for the Range Rover family, will share architecture with the next-generation Jaguar XJ.

Jag’s long-running XJ bit the dust amid falling sales earlier this year, with the brand vowing to return it in an entirely new form. A liftback bodystyle is expected, as is an all-electric powertrain. (Europe’s all about top-end executive EVs these days, and Jag would arguably be foolish to not match the Germans at their game.) This means the Road Rover, which JLR describes in documents as a “medium SUV,” will dispense with internal combustion powerplants.

There’s plenty of those to be had in existing Land Rovers, as well as the upcoming, off-road focused Defender, anyway. The timing here is interesting. With the Defender returning to recapture the title of well-bred off-road king, a green model that concerns itself with on-road manners and futuristic tech would compliment the lineup. It would also provide JLR with an additional vehicle, under an additional badge, to boost scale and further its green ambitions.

Borrowing the Jag’s Modular Longitudinal Platform (MLA) platform, battery pack, and motors, the Road Rover is believed to slot between the Range Rover Velar and Evoque in terms of footprint, boasting a chopped roofline and more aerodynamic front end than its siblings. Its ground clearance would also fall short of Land Rover’s more rugged offerings, though perhaps not at all times.

Expect to see this pavement-happy creature slink towards customers in late 2021, Autocar states.

[Image: Jaguar Land Rover]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 7 comments
  • ToolGuy ToolGuy on Oct 22, 2019

    Road Rover, Road Rover, let this decade be over.

  • Redapple Redapple on Oct 23, 2019

    Utter garbage. I do not wish them well. My new LR4 was endlessly in the shop. A GGM Tahoe would have been much better. Save your pennies peeps. The crash is coming and you will be flattened. Once interest rates revert to historic norms. Ouch !!!!

  • Jonathan IMO the hatchback sedans like the Audi A5 Sportback, the Kia Stinger, and the already gone Buick Sportback are the answer to SUVs. The A5 and the AWD version of the Stinger being the better overall option IMO. I drive the A5, and love the depth and size of the trunk space as well as the low lift over. I've yet to find anything I need to carry that I can't, although I admit I don't carry things like drywall, building materials, etc. However, add in the fun to drive handling characteristics, there's almost no SUV that compares.
  • C-b65792653 I'm starting to wonder about Elon....again!!I see a parallel with Henry Ford who was the wealthiest industrialist at one time. Henry went off on a tangent with the peace ship for WWI, Ford TriMotor, invasive social engineering, etc. Once the economy went bad, the focus fell back to cars. Elon became one of the wealthiest industrialist in the 21st century. Then he went off with the space venture, boring holes in the ground venture, "X" (formerly Twitter), etc, etc, etc. Once Tesla hit a plateau and he realized his EVs were a commodity, he too is focused on his primary money making machine. Yet, I feel Elon is over reacting. Down sizing is the nature of the beast in the auto industry; you can't get around that. But hacking the Super Charger division is like cutting off your own leg. IIRC, GM and Ford were scheduled to sign on to the exclusive Tesla charging format. That would have doubled or tripled his charging opportunity. I wonder what those at the Renaissance Center and the Glass House are thinking now. As alluded to, there's blood in the water and other charging companies will fill the void. I believe other nations have standardized EV charging (EU & China). Elon had the chance to have his charging system as the default in North America. Now, he's dropped the ball. He's lost considerable influence on what the standardized format will eventually be. Tremendous opportunity lost. 🚗🚗🚗
  • Tassos I never used winter tires, and the last two decades I am driving almost only rear wheel drive cars, half of them in MI. I always bought all season tires for them, but the diff between touring and non touring flavors never came up. Does it make even the smallest bit of difference? (I will not read the lengthy article because I believe it does not).
  • Lou_BC ???
  • Lou_BC Mustang sedan? 4 doors? A quarterhorse?Ford nomenclature will become:F Series - Pickups Raptor - performance division Bronco - 4x4 SUV/CUVExplorer - police fleetsMustang- cars
Next