Jeep Thrills: Apple Banishes a Little Blue Emoji

by Matthew Guy

Published: October 10th, 2019

jeep thrills apple banishes a little blue emoji

Betcha thought we were done talking about emojis around here, eh? Not so fast, Happy Meal. While one brand is busy attaching themselves to the too-cute digital pixels, another is furiously trying to unhook itself from an emoji it feels does not represent its image.

Alert readers (and avid texters) will have noticed that typing the word ‘Jeep’ into their iOS device automatically produced a blue blob of a thing as a suggested emoji replacement for that word. The most recent platform update erased this connection and Jeep is celebrating with a few words of their own.

According to spox for the brand, Jeep didn’t officially lobby to be unhitched from the emoji, one which Jeep thinks is not Trail Rated in any way, shape, or form. They have a bit of a minor point. After all, the blue … thing … that popped up has no business being conflated with a Wrangler, though one could argue it could’ve represented a ZJ Grand Cherokee that was left in the sun to melt for a few weeks then put in a taffy puller.

The emoji hasn’t disappeared with the new iOS update and still pops up as a suggested replacement for the word ‘car’ or ‘SUV’. Using ‘crossover’ does nothing, much as in real life.

https://twitter.com/Jeep/status/1181956826629394432?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1181956826629394432&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.autonews.com%2Fmarketing%2Fjeep-liberated-apple-emoji-celebrates-new-campaign

Jeep clapped back on social media after the emoji stopped being associated with their brand, producing a couple of quick videos highlighting their approval, complete with a hashtag declaring Peppered with Jeeps doing Jeepy things, the main message is one of reinforcing the brand’s off-road cred.

On the flip side, Ford was the architect of a successful campaign to get a pickup truck emoji on next year’s shortlist of new characters. The Unicode Consortium, which is a real thing that oversees emoji development despite sounding like a villainous organization on Star Trek, hasn’t yet formally approved the inclusion of the blue pickup but will likely do so sometime in the next calendar year.

Your author hopes this is the last time he scribes about emojis on an automotive site. More 700+ horsepower widebody Chargers, please.

[Image: FCA]

#Emoji #Fca #Ios #Jeep #Marketing #Texting #Wrangler

Matthew Guy

Matthew buys, sells, fixes, & races cars. As a human index of auto & auction knowledge, he is fond of making money and offering loud opinions.

More by Matthew Guy

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 8 comments

La834 on Oct 10, 2019

The blue emoji does look a bit like a Renegade

Like Reply
Inside Looking Out on Oct 10, 2019

I wonder what emoji Apple suggests when you type "Taiwan" or "Hong Kong".

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Billyboy The Big Three, or what used to be the Big Three, have been building sedans in the FWD unibody mold since the 80’s to compete with the Japanese - and failing. The Taurus was the only decent attempt, and even that fizzled out after a few years. Back to GM, There’s no reason to choose a Malibu over a Camry or Accord for normal buyers. The story was the same when it was the Citation, Celebrity, Lumina, and Impala, as it was the same with Ford and Chrysler. GM knows this, as does Ford, and doesn’t care - and rightfully so. Better to cede this time-worn commodity segment to others and focus to where the market has shifted.
CanadaCraig You are not wrong. Or a dummy for that matter. I also think it's foolish of GM to kill off the Malibu. That said... I think there needs to be full-sized plain jane sedans for sale. And there are none. And haven't been for a long time. A basic BIG car. With room for six. Bench seat and all. Nothing fancy. And a low price to go along with it. I would buy one.
OCcarguy Back in the 1980s the Mitsubishi Cordia was one of my favorite cars. I would love to see them make cars we could get excited about again.
Chris I dislike SUVs. I think they are clunky looking and not much in the handling department. I'll take an Audi A4 or BMw three series or even a VW Jetta over any SUV. It I need more interior room for a shot time, I'll rent something bigger.
Amwhalbi I have a sedan and an SUV, and for pure driving and riding enjoyment, I'll pick my sedan every time. But yes, SUV's are generally more practical for all around usage, particularly if you have only one vehicle. So I think the perfect answer is the sedan hatchback (a la the last Buick Regal) which can still yield the drive and ride or a sedan, yet provide a greater modicum of practical, accessible cargo capacity. Most of the sedans made could (with minor styling changes) easily become 4 door hatchbacks. Oh, yeah, I forgot - Americans don't like hatchbacks, even if they do in Europe...