Mercedes-Benz X-Class Pickup Truck Already Dead: Report

by Chad Kirchner

Published: July 17th, 2019

mercedes benz x class pickup truck already dead report

The Mercedes-Benz X-Class pickup truck is the company’s attempt to get in on the growing pickup truck market on a global scale. Based on Nissan’s Navarra, it’s a premium mid-sized offering available in select markets that are not the United States.

If the latest reports are true, it’s also a dead product.

Automotive News Europe recently reported that Daimler has killed the truck due to slumping sales. It hasn’t been on the market long, being introduced in 2017. But, with only 16,700 units sold last year in Europe, Australia and South Africa, it wasn’t shaping up to be a winner. While it did do better than the Navarra-based Renault Alaskan, the Navarra itself performed significantly better in sales.

Pricing was high. It started at €37,294 (about $41,900 USD). Seems like an open and shut case. But one of the key pickup truck markets is the United States, which wasn’t a market considered for the X-Class. Part of that is because of the Chicken Tax, which would require a 25 percent import tariff if it wasn’t built here.

I’m sad to see the truck go. Premium trucks do extremely well in the United States, and if Mercedes-Benz would’ve found a way to build the truck here, I believe it would have done well. The only premium midsize truck on sale is the GMC Canyon, and it shares an interior with the Colorado which isn’t particularly upscale.

In the fall, I had a chance to drive the Navarra in Africa and found it to be a competent, fun truck. One of the European journalists I was partnered with considered the Navarra — with its LED headlights and dual-zone climate control — premium. Here in the United States, those features on now standard on most mid-range trucks.

My point is that X-Class was closer to a proper premium offering, which is non-existent in the midsize segment. The midsize segment isn’t dominated by an American-based manufacturer. The opportunity was there, but Mercedes didn’t want to try.

That’s unfortunate.

[Image: Mercedes-Benz]

#ChickenTax #Mercedes-Benz #Mercedes-BenzX-Class #Trucks #X-Class

Chad Kirchner

More by Chad Kirchner

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 18 comments

MKizzy on Jul 17, 2019

A Mercedes compact pickup based on a Nissan who can't even be bothered to make its own products competitive these days? Gee, wonder why it failed?

Like Reply
- Sgeffe on Jul 20, 2019
  
  Had a 2019 Versa SV for a rental for the day Thursday. Underwhelming, if competent. Visibility excellent, and I could rest my elbow on the door sill, better than in my new Accord. Good acceleration off the line, then once you hit 4K rpm, forward progress becomes glacial even as the engine moans away. Truly an appliance! But why, dear Lord, is there an “OD OFF” switch on a CVT??!!
  
  Like
Downunder on Jul 18, 2019

Yes, it is unfortunate that they didn't try to differentiate between the two. It was so glaringly obvious where the X class came from when you saw a Navarra and an X parked beside each other. Downunder the premium price bought tweaked suspension and a slightly wider bed. Premium trucks aren't big sellers, who what to take an $80,000 plus vehicle on a building site just to cart concrete around, that's why you buy a Great Wall pickup.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

Steve Jacobs I've got a bright Red Kia EV6. Easy to find in a parking lot.
MKizzy Gently used EV6's under $30K aren't hard to find and have the range and style to almost intrigue me into taking the EV plunge. However, I'll wait for a mid-sized non-luxury EV sedan or wagon which is not a tablet housing a car (Model 3) or sacrifices too much usable space for the sake of style (Ioniq 6) before I go electric. I'm not holding my breath.
Arthur Dailey Am currently comparing both vehicles. Some issues not addressed in the article 1) the wait times for most RAV4's are currently considerably longer, 2) RAV4's are among the most stolen vehicles in my area (the GTA), 3) Mazda has a superior warranty. Manufacturing locations are perhaps a toss up. For the majority of these vehicles sold in the Canadian market from what I can ascertain, CX-5's are manufactured in Japan, and RAV4's in Alliston Ontario. One area where I will disagree with Matt is in the upholstery. I far prefer cloth to leather. With grandchildren and a dog, there is far more chance that the leather will be cut or scratched. And leather, particularly in black is too hot in the summer and very cold when you first sit on it during a Canadian winter. Cloth is the winner in that competition, but still an inferior choice to rich 1970's style velour upholstery.
Eliyahu I've had my 2018 CX-5 FWD top trim for about 18 months. It is fun to drive and a nice design. Mazda really did a great job of making the most out of the platform when they did the design refresh. The driver's seat, however, is overly firm and perhaps a tad too small. I have also come to appreciate the open feeling of the Forester compared to the well-organized but more closed in cockpit of the CX-5. A minor quibble would be the smallish gas tank. Overall, a very nice design.
Redapple2 CX5. Rented one 2 yr ago. ~2000miles. Issues. 1 Thumbwheel controller not good. 2. Sweeping curve on the interstate passing a car, the automatic braking picked up a car in the lane over. Beeps and slight braking. Not drop anchor mode, but still head scratching. But it looks so dam good. Wonderful still after many years. CX5 all the way!!!