QOTD: Graceful Aging of the Nineties Variety?

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

We’ve talked about the Nineties in a couple of recent QOTDs, and today we’ll do it once more. This inquiry was generated in TTAC’s Slack foyer, where Adam Tonge mused about styling from the greatest decade.

What domestic Nineties ride has aged better than all the others?

The rules for today’s game are simple, and three:

  1. All selections must be model years 1990 to 1999.
  2. Picks must be from a domestic manufacturer, even if sourced from an import (eg. Mercury Villager).
  3. Any bodystyle is eligible except for trucks.

And that’s it; the rest of the field is wide open. Let’s get you all started out right.

Here’s my pick — the third-generation Cadillac STS. It narrowly squeezes into our game with a debut in 1998. Caddy’s boxy, afterthought first-generation STS debuted as an upmarket sporting trim on the standard front-drive Seville in 1988. The more modern K-body generation bowed in 1992 in SLS (Seville Luxury Sedan) and STS (Seville Touring Sedan) guises. While the eagerly anticipated 4.6-liter Northstar was not available in the new models’ first year, Cadillac replaced the trusty 4.9-liter V8 in the STS for 1993, and the SLS in 1994.

In 1998 the SLS and STS moved to the G platform, shaving off a few inches of length. The leaner, meaner STS boasted 300 horsepower, while the SLS made do with 275. Styling was more serious, more sporty, and aimed to look substantial. It did then, and it does now. The STS receives my vote as one of the best-aging domestic cars of the Nineties (with a nod to the Regal above).

Let’s hear your selections.

[Images: Cadillac, Buick]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 138 comments
  • DownUnder2014 DownUnder2014 on May 15, 2019

    The Big 'American' Three here in Australia were rather different...and the offerings were almost completely different (especially with GM). Plus Chrysler withdrew in 1981 and sold their operations to Mitsubishi. So using the 'Big Three' (Chrysler, Ford and Holden): Small Sedan: 1. The KF Laser TX-3 (the KE was better but it stopped in 1989). Medium Sedan: 1. Ford Telstar 2. Toyota Camry/Holden Apollo (XV10) Large Sedan: 1. AU Falcon (1998-2002). The styling has aged better than the VT Commodore, IMO. 2. VP Commodore (1991-93). The lightbar is pretty cool, so it edges out the VN. 3. TH/TJ Magna (1999-2002). The 3.5 V6 is rather quick in these, especially with the 5-Speed Manual. The styling has aged relatively nicely. Chrysler's lineup here consisted of one car, the Neon. It still consists of one car now, being the 300!

  • DownUnder2014 DownUnder2014 on May 15, 2019

    As for the US market: Subcompact/Compact: 1. 2G Ford Escort/Mercury Tracer 2. 1991-94 Cavalier Wagon. Mid-size: 1. Oldsmobile Aurora (both gens, sadly N*-engined, I wonder how the V6 is though) 2. 2G Taurus 3. Chrysler LH cars (they don't age well but look nice) Full-size: 1. Gonna get crucified for this one, but 1998-2011 Ford Crown Victoria 2. 1991-96 Buick Park Avenue (EU-spec though) 3. Toss up between 1992-97 CV and same era MGM...

  • Mgh57 Doesn't seem like this tech is ready for prime time.
  • Nathan The Ram is the most boring looking of the full size trucks, kind of like a Tundra.If they cancel the Ram Classic, I hope a full resign makes the Ram at least look interesting.
  • DJB1 I'll be all for it when it has a proven safety record. I have an awesome life and a lot to live for, so right now I'm not putting that in the hands of overconfident tech-bros.
  • Mgh57 I had to read the article because I had had no idea what the headline meant. I've never seen this in the Northeast. Don't understand the point. Doesn't seen efficient aerodynamically
  • MaintenanceCosts Depends on the record of the company developing them. If it’s got a record of prioritizing safety over years of development, I’ll be fine with it, and I’ll expect it to be less risky than typical idiot human drivers. If it’s a “move fast and break sh!t” outfit like Tesla or Uber, no way.
Next