Rare Rides: The 1989 Nissan S-Cargo - It's Van Time

Corey Lewis
by Corey Lewis

Today Rare Rides takes a look at another one of Nissan’s special Pike cars from the turn of the Nineties. This tiny van is definitely the oddball of the Pike family. It’s an S-Cargo, from 1989.

The first Pike car we featured was the Pao, a clamshell hatchback that borrowed styling cues from European cars of the 1960s. Its industrial, utilitarian look was backed up by a basic interior of simple shapes and minimal levels of complexity. Next up was the oldest issue of the Pike experiment, the Be-1. A two-door sedan, it blended styling from the late Seventies with the appearance of a hatchback.

The S-Cargo took a much different route than those two. First offered for sale in 1989, the S-Cargo was classified as a light commercial vehicle rather than a passenger car. Designers drew inspiration more directly this time: Their muse was a Citroën 2CV delivery van, “Fourgonnette” in Parisian.

Keeping with the derivative theme, all S-Cargos featured a single-spoke steering wheel — a Citroën hallmark. The model’s name was a two-layer dad pun. S-Cargo meant “small cargo,” and was a wordplay on the French word for snail, “escargot.” In addition to a generally snail-like shape, the model’s logo (which is deliciously Seventies looking) was a snail.

Like the other Pike cars, the S-Cargo lacked Nissan branding and was available only via reservation. A total of 8,000 were produced for model years 1989 through 1991. Also like its siblings, it had the underpinnings of a Micra. In this case, that meant a 1.5-liter four-cylinder engine, mated to a three-speed automatic.

Today’s Rare Ride is an excellent condition example located in Seattle. It has both optional extras: the portal windows on the cargo area, and an electric canvas roof. With 32,000 miles on the clock, it asks $12,500. Small price to pay for a snail you can drive.

[Images: seller]

Corey Lewis
Corey Lewis

Interested in lots of cars and their various historical contexts. Started writing articles for TTAC in late 2016, when my first posts were QOTDs. From there I started a few new series like Rare Rides, Buy/Drive/Burn, Abandoned History, and most recently Rare Rides Icons. Operating from a home base in Cincinnati, Ohio, a relative auto journalist dead zone. Many of my articles are prompted by something I'll see on social media that sparks my interest and causes me to research. Finding articles and information from the early days of the internet and beyond that covers the little details lost to time: trim packages, color and wheel choices, interior fabrics. Beyond those, I'm fascinated by automotive industry experiments, both failures and successes. Lately I've taken an interest in AI, and generating "what if" type images for car models long dead. Reincarnating a modern Toyota Paseo, Lincoln Mark IX, or Isuzu Trooper through a text prompt is fun. Fun to post them on Twitter too, and watch people overreact. To that end, the social media I use most is Twitter, @CoreyLewis86. I also contribute pieces for Forbes Wheels and Forbes Home.

More by Corey Lewis

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 14 comments
  • Redapple2 UAW may have a valid issue. I ve been in plants that were bad. ....and i greatly dislike the UAW. I may need a 3/4 ton pick up. It will be a hecho Ram gas.
  • TheMrFreeze So basically no manual transmissions in US cars after 2029.I just raised one finger in the general direction of NHTSB's main office. Guess which finger it is!
  • TheMrFreeze Wife drives a Fiat 500 Turbo 5-speed (135hp vs. 160 in the Abarth), it's a lot of fun to drive and hasn't given us any headaches. Maintenance on it is not as bad as you'd think for such a cramped engine compartment...Fiat did put some thought into it in that regard. Back seat is...cramped...but the front is surprisingly roomy for what it is.I honestly wouldn't mind having one myself, but yeah, gotta have a manual trans.
  • Bkojote Tesla's in a death spiral right now. The closest analog would be Motorola circa 2007.The formula is the exact same. -Vocal CEO who came in and took credit for the foundation their predecessor while cutting said efforts behind successful projects.-A heavy reliance on price/margin cuts and heavy subsidies to keep existing stock moving. The RAZR became a $99 phone after starting out as a $399 phone, the same way a Model 3 is now a $25k car.-Increasing focus on BS projects over shipping something working and functional to distract shareholders from the failures of current products. Replace "iTunes Phone" (remember that?) with "Cybertruck" and when that's a dud focus on "Java-Linux" the same way they're now focusing "Robotaxis".-Increasingly cut away investment in quality-of-ownership things. Like Motorola, Tesla's cut cut cut away their development, engineering, and support teams. If you ever had the misfortune of using a Motorola Q you're familiar with just how miserable Tesla Autopilot is these days.-Ship less and less completed products as a preview of something new. Time and time again at CES/Trade Shows Motorola was showing half-working 'concept' devices. The Cybertruck was announced 5 years ago yet functionally is missing most of its features- and the ones it has don't work. And I mean basic stuff- the AWD logic is embarrassingly primitive. A lot of Tesla hyperbole focuses on either he's a 4D-chess playing genius visionary or all of Tesla's being propped up by gov't mandates. But the reality is this company hasn't delivered any meaningful product evolution in the better half of this past decade.
  • Pig_Iron Stellantis is looking for excuses to close plants. Shawn Fain just gave them one. 🐹
Next