Hyundai's EV Range Reign to Prove Short-lived in Europe

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Hyundai’s front-drive Kona Electric began appearing on Norwegian streets back in August, slowly proliferating to other European countries ever since. Backing up the model was its enviable status as the longest-range EV on the market.

Using the new Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP), testers rated the Kona EV’s range at 292 miles, more than enough to travel between tightly spaced European cities. Now, the vehicle faces a double blow of bad news. First, the testers got the test wrong, and second, a new Tesla his poised to arrive on the east side of the Atlantic.

Both Hyundai and Kia have had to downgrade the range of their new electric sort-of crossovers after learning their external test agency followed the wrong procedure. As such, the range of the 64 kWh Kona Electric drops from 292 miles to 279 miles, while the entry-level model (which we won’t get here) drops from 186 miles to 180 miles.

Kia’s e-Niro, following close on the Kona’s heels, sees its 64 kWh variant fall from 301 miles to 282 miles. The lesser, 39 kWh version drops from 193 miles to 179.

In a statement reported by Autocar, Hyundai said, “In testing the Kona Electric to establish its homologated electric vehicle driving range, the independent organisation overseeing the process accidentally provided an incorrect testing methodology and then approved the results it generated.

“This led to the Kona Electric being tested for a disproportionate length of time on the WLTP ‘urban’ cycle – comprising lower overall vehicle speeds and a reduced energy requirement – resulting in an overestimation of the vehicle’s all-electric range.”

Bummer. In the U.S., Hyundai’s gas-free Kona rates 258 miles on the EPA cycle, which is some 20 miles ahead of the Chevrolet Bolt. Tesla’s new “Mid Range” Model 3, currently the cheapest Model 3 available, is rated for 260 miles between plug-ins.

Speaking of the Model 3, demonstrator models have now arrived to further annoy Hyundai on European soil. While deliveries of the Model 3 aren’t expected until the middle of 2019, would-be customers in some locales can now sit in and test drive their prospective purchase, further drumming up demand. Available for ordering are the twin-motor Long Range and Performance variants, rated (on the WLTP cycle) at 338 and 330 miles, respectively.

Hyundai’s time on the throne stands to be as short-lived as that of flaky Edward VIII.

[Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
7 of 12 comments
  • DougDolde DougDolde on Dec 07, 2018

    I have never considered Hundai a car I would consider buying. Any model.

  • Asdf Asdf on Dec 08, 2018

    I don't get all the articles about BEVs at TTAC. The truth about electric cars is that there's not a single BEV ever manufactured that has a reason to exist outside of the R&D departments of their respective automakers. As cars they are without exceptions total, utter crap, usually with short range, and always with extremely slow charging times and exorbitant prices. In short, BEVs have no business being sold in the market AT ALL at this point, and their presence is an embarrassing joke. It makes no sense for TTAC to waste time writing articles about them.

    • See 2 previous
    • Jatz Jatz on Dec 08, 2018

      @Lee in MD No one who has taken the adolescent dare to whiz on an electric fence can ever forgive.

  • W Conrad I'm not afraid of them, but they aren't needed for everyone or everywhere. Long haul and highway driving sure, but in the city, nope.
  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
Next