China Readies Rigid Auto Investment Rules for 2019

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

Despite spending a fortune supporting burgeoning automotive manufacturers and opening its door to foreign enterprises, China’s state planner has approved strict new regulations on investments within the industry.

Following a handful of draft proposals earlier this year, China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced it will ban new independent businesses that make only traditional combustion engines while continuing to push for more “new energy” vehicles.

The People’s Republic has what some might call a bit of a pollution problem. But it’s also one of the largest and fastest-growing battery producers in the world; state policy aims for the widespread adoption of electric vehicles. Unfortunately, this left China with hundreds of automotive startups that will never become profitable just as the country enters an economic downturn and its first year of negative car-sale growth in decades.

The NDRC’s decision is likely intended to help amalgamate the country’s overgrown and fractured auto sector while simultaneously making it harder for foreign businesses to move in after China “opened up” its market earlier this year. According to Reuters, the new rules should come into effect on January 10th.

From Reuters:

A draft of the policy released earlier this year alarmed some foreign carmakers, who worried Beijing was trying to trigger consolidation of the country’s flabby auto industry through mergers and strategic cooperation.

The regulation puts the tightest restrictions on new capacity in traditional combustion engine cars, but also adds hurdles for companies investing in electric vehicles.

It could, however, open the door to new plant approvals for [new energy vehicle] makers, which have, in effect, been suspended since the middle of last year when the last approval was granted.

The China Association of Automobile Manufacturers (CAAM) predicts flat vehicle sales through 2019 — though some foreign analysts expect a drop akin to what we’ve seen this year. Regardless, CAAM believes the NDRC’s new regulations will help cull the more feeble auto businesses that were allowed to proliferate.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
16 of 23 comments
  • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Dec 18, 2018

    And I am still a proponent of importing into the US cheap Made-In-China disposable cars that peeps can afford as their DDs. A long time ago it started with the VW bug. Then the Japanese cheapie imports followed. And after that it was the el cheapo South Korean- made cars. There's no reason why we in America cannot import cheap EV and ICE cars from China, and apply the same tariffs to these Chinese-made cars that the Chinese apply to American-made cars imported into China. There aren't any affordable cars sold in the US any longer. And Base models are few and far between because the automakers lose money on every one they make.

    • See 11 previous
    • Highdesertcat Highdesertcat on Dec 19, 2018

      @PandaBear This is what people tell me who wear out cars at the rate of 1000+ miles per week commuting to/from their jobs to where they live. One guy I know works for the Border Patrol and commutes to the Sector office in El Paso daily, that’s at least 200+ miles roundtrip. Once he gets there he can get a CBP car to go where he needs to go out in the field. He was buying used for awhile but needed to keep three of these commuters on hand so he would always have wheels because one was always in the shop. Now he buys new, and whatever is cheapest.

  • Jalop1991 Jalop1991 on Dec 19, 2018

    "The People’s Republic has what some might call a bit of a pollution problem. But it’s also one of the largest and fastest-growing battery producers in the world" No kidding. When you have zero constraints on working with the toxic materials that make up batteries (not to mention labor is free and expendable and replaceable), and to that you add the backing of the state to acquire said materials, what else do you expect to happen. "China Readies Rigid Auto Investment Rules for 2019" Every man wants a Ridgid tool.

    • See 1 previous
    • JoDa JoDa on Dec 19, 2018

      @Lorenzo The Chinese people still burn coal for heat...The cars actually clean the air.

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next