Ford Cautious but Optimistic Ahead of Key Volkswagen Meeting

by Steph Willems

Published: November 15th, 2018

ford cautious but optimistic ahead of key volkswagen meeting

Volkswagen’s supervisory board meets Friday to discuss how to handle the next decade of vehicle development, with CEO Herbert Diess expected to present a strategy that includes Ford as a key partner. The two automakers already have a Memorandum of Understanding with an eye on commercial vehicles, but VW could take the relationship further. Much further.

Ford’s Jim Hackett admits the talks are going well, but the CEO isn’t about to leap into bed without taking precautions.

Telling Reuters that he’s open to rival automakers’ cash when it comes to autonomous vehicles, Hackett said that any expansion of its partnership with VW would be a “delicate dance.”

On commercial vehicles, Hackett said the discussion is “going better than we thought it would,” adding that, “Herbert and I had a great discussion.” With sources already whispering to media about potential platform swaps, VW assisting Ford in Europe and Latin America, the Germans gaining access to the Ranger platform, and Ford borrowing VW’s electric MEB bones, the future contains a range of possibilities for the two companies. Hackett’s approaching it with caution, claiming no deal has been made.

“We compete in a bunch of areas as well,” he said.

Ford faces stiff competition in the autonomous vehicle field. GM-owned Cruise hopes to have a commercial self-driving ride-hailing fleet in service next year, while Waymo, backed by a promise of boatloads of Chrysler Pacificas, plans to cautiously enter that realm in December. Ford’s controlling stake in self-driving startup Argo AI is just part of its broader autonomous efforts, with the company entering into pilot programs with companies offering home delivery. Think pizzas and dry cleaning.

One goal, however, is for Ford Autonomous Vehicles to give birth to a versatile ride-hailing fleet of its own, using vehicles developed by Ford.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

#Ford #Partnerships #Volkswagen

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

2 of 5 comments

Big Al from Oz on Nov 15, 2018

Well its very evident that VAG will have the upper hand in these negotiations. Ford is limited in what it can offer VAG. VAG has the world very much stitched up compared to Ford. Ford might have the F Series, but these are very reliant on heavy protectionism and are not viable globally. Will Ford become subservient to VAG in any arrangement? Will VAG force Ford to adopt a more efficient business structure? Ford needs a new org chart made and to lean operations to become competitive globally, like GM. The world has changed and is changing rapidly, US industry need to get on board and start leaning operations and outsourcing what they are not efficient at.

Like Reply
SPPPP on Nov 15, 2018

This potential partnership is kind of funny in light of what I was thinking about the VW Passat recently - it's like a better version of the Ford Taurus. Someone also pointed out that the Fusion is somewhat Germanic in character, which is another interesting thing. But that car is going away, so, oh well.

Like Reply

Recent Comments

NJRide Let Cadillac be Cadillac, but in the context of 2024. As a new XT5 owner (the Emerald Green got me to buy an old design) I would have happy preferred a Lyriq hybrid. Some who really like the Lyriq's package but don't want an EV will buy another model. Most will go elsewhere. I love the V6 and good but easy to use infotainment. But I know my next car will probably be more electrified w more tech.I don't think anyone is confusing my car for a Blazer but i agree the XT6 is too derivative. Frankly the Enclave looks more prestigious. The Escalade still has got it, though I would love to see the ESV make a comeback. I still think GM missed the boat by not making a Colorado based mini-Blazer and Escalade. I don't get the 2 sedans. I feel a slightly larger and more distinctly Cadillac sedan would sell better. They also need to advertise beyond the Lyriq. I don't feel other luxury players are exactly hitting it out of the park right now so a strengthened Cadillac could regain share.
CM Korecko Cadillacs traditionally have been opulent, brash and leaders in the field; the "Standard of the World".That said, here's how to fix the brand:[list=1][*]Forget German luxury cars ever existed.[/*][*]Get rid of the astromech droid names and bring back Seville, Deville, Eldorado, Fleetwood and Brougham.[/*][*]End the electric crap altogether and make huge, gas guzzling land yachts for the significant portion of the population that would fight for a chance to buy one.[/*][*]Stop making sports cars and make true luxury cars for those of us who don't give a damn about the environment and are willing to swim upstream to get what we really want.[/*][*]Stop messing around with technology and make well-made and luxurious interiors.[/*][*]Watch sales skyrocket as a truly different product distinguishes itself to the delight of the target market and the damnation of the Sierra Club. Hell, there is no such thing as bad publicity and the "bad guy" image would actually have a lot of appeal.[/*][/list=1]
FreedMike Not surprisingly, I have some ideas. What Cadillac needs, I think, is a statement. They don’t really have an identity. They’re trying a statement car with the Celestiq, and while that’s the right idea, it has the wrong styling and a really wrong price tag. So, here’s a first step: instead of a sedan, do a huge, fast, capable and ridiculously smooth and quiet electric touring coupe. If you want an example of what I’m thinking of, check out the magnificent Rolls-Royce Spectre. But this Cadillac coupe would be uniquely American, it’d be named “Eldorado,” and it’d be a lot cheaper than the $450,000 Spectre – call it a buck twenty-five, with a range of bespoke options for prospective buyers that would make each one somewhat unique. Make it 220 inches long, on the same platform as the Celestiq, give it retro ‘60s styling (or you could do a ‘50s or ‘70s throwback, I suppose), and at least 700 horsepower, standard. Why electric? It’s the ultimate throwback to ‘60s powertrains: effortlessly fast, smooth, and quiet, but with a ton more horsepower. It’s the perfect drivetrain for a dignified touring coupe. In fact, I’d skip any mention of environmental responsibility in this car’s marketing – sell it on how it drives, period.  How many would they sell? Not many. But the point of the exercise is to do something that will turn heads and show people what this brand can do.  Second step: give the lineup a mix of electric and gas models, and make Cadillac gas engines bespoke to the brand. If they need to use generic GM engine designs, fine – take those engines and massage them thoroughly into something special to Cadillac, with specific tuning and output. No Cadillac should leave the factory with an engine straight out of a Malibu or a four-banger Silverado. Third step: a complete line-wide interior redo. Stop the cheapness that’s all over the current sedans and crossovers. Just stop it. Use the Lyriq as a blueprint – it’s a big improvement over the current crop and a good first step. I’d also say Cadillac has a good blend of screen-controlled and switch-controlled user interfaces; don’t give into the haptic-touch and wall-to-wall screen thing. (On the subject of Caddy interiors – as much as I bag on the Celestiq, check out the interior on that thing. Wow.)Fourth step: Blackwing All The Things – some gas, others electric. And keep the electric/gas mix so buyers have a choice.Fifth step: be patient. That’s not easy, but if they’re doing a brand reset, it’ll take time. 
NJRide So if GM was serious about selling this why no updates for so long? Or make something truly unique instead of something that looked like a downmarket Altima?
Kmars2009 I rented one last fall while visiting Ohio. Not a bad car...but not a great car either. I think it needs a new version. But CUVs are King... unfortunately!