Midterm Elections Add Ticking Clock Element to Congress' Self-Driving Car Bill

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

It looks like Congress’ new self-driving bill might have to wait until a new batch of unmentionables plant their collective rear ends in the seats populating Capitol Hill. Already passed in the House, the SELF DRIVE Act has managed to garner bipartisan support — a true miracle in these troubled times.

However, it’ll have to spread wings if it wants to be signed into law before year’s end. The midterm elections could stymie everything and force Congress to start all over again. A likely prospect, considering the Senate is still going over the bill.

“This entire process has been an incredible feat of bipartisanship,” Greg Rogers, director of government affairs at Securing America’s Future Energy, told Bloomberg. “Attempting to recreate a bill that’s this ambitious and this significant would be like trying to catch lightning in a bottle all over again.”

Lawmakers have until roughly the end of November to get it to President Trump for signing. Anything later would likely place the bill into serious jeopardy, something which neither automakers or the tech industry wants.

From Bloomberg:

Negotiations on the Senate bill were still underway as lawmakers left for the recess, as bill authors John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Democrats Gary Peters of Michigan and Bill Nelson of Florida, tried to iron out remaining concerns.

It’s uncertain whether the bipartisan agreement that produced both the House and the Senate measures will be re-created in the next Congress. If Democrats secure a majority in the House, legislative priorities may shift. The rancor and discord that has upended other measures such as immigration and health care reform may spill over.

Honestly, we feel that Congress likely has plenty of time to get a comprehensive bill passed — even it has to be tweaked by new officials. Despite a few high-profile incidents that spurred a moderate backlash against autonomous vehicles, many states already provide automakers with a relatively open door policy to conduct testing, though true self-driving cars still appear to be years off.

We’d like to see politicians use that time to better verse themselves in current technologies and think about the long term ramifications of automated vehicles. It’s an immensely complicated issue that has real potential to bolster safety and the United States’ engineering might. But it comes with a cavalcade of issues in terms of legal liability, data security, employment, the larger economy, and personal freedom.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 1 comment
  • Kruser Kruser on Nov 01, 2018

    Who will be the first to say that self-driving cars "won't happen in my lifetime", or "maybe in 50 years"? ;)

  • Jeff gm made a mistake by not continuing the Malibu and making it a hybrid only. Offer it as an affordable hybrid and keep the body style with a slight refresh and better interior. Hybrid Ford Fusions are still popular despite being discontinued a number of years ago. 2025 the Camry is going all hybrid.
  • Jeff I think it is a mistake to use the Camaro brand on a 4 door sedan or suv. Mustang did enough damage using the name on an electric crossover. Either make a 2 door car for the enthusiasts with the Camaro name or find another name. Chevy has names from the past like Kingswood and Biscayne that they could use on an electric crossover or sedan. Save the Camaro name for a really special car not some suv, crossover, or sedan. Chevy did enough damage using the Blazer name on a crossover.
  • 28-Cars-Later No coverage of Mercedes rejecting UAW? Vote was something like 2600 against to 2000 for, saw it in a blurb in ThinkorSwim.
  • Ajla "there’s a Mustang sedan under consideration — noting that the nameplate would hopefully play host to a V8 powertrain"If this happens watch how fast I tell Dodge to go f*ck themselves.
  • Tassos Automotive executives should be speculating on why only the smartest and most successful serious people™️ are bragging about driving 16 year old mercedes e-classes with the bluetec engines. I have a rebuilt one in North America and the second is a lemon law unit shipped to Eastern Europe. I didn’t buy either new but automotive executives should still be studying my scenerio as I am the main character in the automotive world.
Next