North American Buyers Couldn't Prop Up Ford's Global Business in the Last Quarter

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

China, Europe, and South America all conspired to sink Ford’s profits in the third quarter of 2018, with the automaker posting a 37 percent net income drop compared to the same quarter a year ago.

The earnings report came the same day Ford announced the creation of a standalone Chinese business unit, Ford China. Dismal overseas performance didn’t come as a shock, however, as these headwinds were also felt in previous quarters, albeit not as strongly. That hasn’t stopped a barrage of questions directed at CEO Jim Hackett over how he plans to build a successful operation outside of America’s borders.

In Q3 2018, Ford Motor Company’s net income came in at $991 million, down from $1.6 billion in Q3 2017. Revenue was up, though, by just over a billion dollars. High ATPs and beefy margins in the truck-heavy North American market can take credit for that balance sheet bright spot.

While Ford’s pre-tax profit in North America rose in spite of a year-to-date drop in vehicle sales, head east or west from the American coastline and red ink abounds.

The only overseas businesses to see an income gain were the Middle East and Africa (up $47 million on a pre-tax/pre-interest basis, a turnaround compared to Q3 2017), and the part of the Asia-Pacific region that doesn’t include China. The latter region, which turned a profit last year, lost Ford $208 million, all because of cratering Chinese volume. Europe was also dismal, with that troubled unit posting a $245 million loss.

Ford finds itself in the middle of a $11 million streamlining plan designed to winnow the automaker’s global white-collar workforce and boost profitability in all regions. There’s product plans afoot for Europe and China. Still, Hackett didn’t have anything new to add about the anticipated layoffs during an earnings call.

New details won’t arrive until the second quarter of 2019, he said, adding that evidence of the turnaround can already be seen in the company’s North American margins.

“What I remind everybody of is we first have to find the areas that need the attention,” Hackett said. “We’re through that. We then have to design the solutions for them. We’re through a lot of that but not all of it. And then we have to put them in place and perform. If you read hesitancy from me, it’s not that we don’t know where we’re going or don’t know how to do it, it’s that there’s a massive undertaking that we have to have very thoughtfully orchestrated. Because my experience in doing this, the worst thing we could do is disrupt our business and we aren’t going to do that.”

Restructuring aside, there’s no bad news at Ford Credit, which recorded its most profitable quarter in seven years — a result spurred by less leasing and big-buck auction values for off-lease vehicles.

Still, despite the company’s health in North America, the overseas uncertainty meant Ford was forced to dial back its prediction of an 8 percent pre-tax profit margin by 2020. That’s now pushed ahead to a later date. Investors didn’t seem to mind, though. After Ford affirmed the company’s dividend, the automaker’s stubbornly depressed stock rose over 8 percent in Thursday trading.

[Sources: CNBC, The Motley Fool] [Image: Ford]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 9 comments
  • Inside Looking Out Inside Looking Out on Oct 25, 2018

    Tesla is on the path to become second largest automaker after GM.

    • See 1 previous
    • Pch101 Pch101 on Oct 26, 2018

      The largest automakers today are VAG and Renault-Nissan. They each sell over 10 million units per year. In other words, there is absolutely nothing accurate about your post. 0%.

  • APaGttH APaGttH on Oct 25, 2018

    God GM is so stupid for keeping Buick - they should have sold the brand to the Chinese... Still waiting for that GM collapse in China Bertel kept predicting...

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next