Auto Coalition Joins Forces With NATCO to Rethink City Streets, Share Driving Data

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The National Association of City Transportation Officials (NATCO) has joined Ford, Uber and Lyft to work with the data platform SharedStreets to glean a better understanding of America’s infrastructure. Their collective goal is to “make it easier for the private sector to work with cities around the world and leverage data to improve urban mobility.”

That means different things to different companies. For Uber and Lyft, aggregate data on passenger pickups and drop-offs could be useful in deciding where to deploy their vehicles. The information could also prove helpful in telling city planners how to best manage traffic patterns. Uber also said it would track speeders and what on types of roads people are more apt to drive dangerously.

While effectively working toward the same ends, Lyft appears a little more focused on finding ways to minimize congestion. For the past year, ride-sharing platforms have taken criticisms for exacerbating urban congestion, with the problem likely to grow worse over the coming years. However, much of the onus to fix the problem lands on the shoulders of city planners. Uber and Lyft only seem to want to identify trouble spots and then leave NACTO to do the fixing by reworking streetlights and traffic pathways.

Ford says it wants to use SharedStreets to encourage the responsible pricing and management of curb space in real time. According to the press release, the automaker intends to provide a “down payment on a global, comprehensive roadway pricing mechanism that cities and companies can use to encourage sustainable transportation choices, reallocate road space, and reduce carbon emissions.”

Of course, this is also the kind of information Ford could use while developing its own commercial fleets. The company has already laid the groundwork for autonomous delivery and ride-hailing services in Miami, Florida.

“This is a once in a lifetime opportunity for business and government to work together to rethink transportation,” said Jim Hackett, president and CEO of the Ford Motor Company. “Collaborating through initiatives such as Shared Streets will enable us to use vehicles, road systems and data together to create a new roadmap for mobility. We are working toward a future where all cities are smart and curb space is actively managed, increasing efficiency and safety, while reducing driver stress and pollution.”

Leadership from the other partner companies expressed a similar interest in using information to evolve the country’s roads. While SharedStreets’ stated goal is to provide open source data that business and cities can contribute to and use to improve all aspects of transportation, it’s also pressing for the development of universal standards for how that information is ultimately collected and shared.

That’s incredibly important for the future of autonomous vehicles and the companies that want to provide or use them. But it’s a little early to say what SharedStreets’ end game is. For now, it only appears interested in giving industry giants and policy makers an opportunity to collaborate. If it’s done altruistically, then we’re less likely to encounter a problem. Freer-flowing streets are good for everyone and someone has to figure out how to manage all the driving data now being collected.

However, SharedStreets is entirely dependent on member cities and private sector partners for its existence. Those for-profit companies are likely to have plenty to say when it comes time to decide how the data should be managed and what lessons should be taken from it. Being able to collaborate with policy makers on an issue may turn out to be just as good as influencing them to see your perspective.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
 2 comments
  • Vulpine Vulpine on Sep 27, 2018

    Data collection--good; letting any operator or OEM have a say in making changes--not good. What's needed more than anything is for the vehicles themselves to communicate with the traffic management system (and each other) to really offer the best flow control.

  • David Dennis David Dennis on Sep 28, 2018

    Don't most passengers want Uber drivers to speed so they reach their destinations faster? If the speed limit on Interstate 95 is 65 and everyone goes 80, how is that handled? If we forced Uber drivers to go 65 we would most likely increase accidents!

  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
  • Bike Rather have a union negotiating my pay rises with inflation at the moment.
  • Bike Poor Redapple won't be sitting down for a while after opening that can of Whiparse
Next