As Tesla Board Circles the Wagons, Report Claims Musk Backed Out of SEC Settlement

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Yesterday’s end-of-day fraud lawsuit filed against Tesla CEO Elon Musk by the Securities and Exchange Commission needn’t have happened, CNBC reports. The CEO and founder turned down a settlement deal that would have seen him pay a “nominal” fine and remove himself as chairman, sources claim. Instead, Musk did what he does best. He went his own way, greatly increasing risk both to himself and his company.

Still, Tesla’s board stands by its man, releasing a statement late Thursday to this effect. According to Bob Lutz, outspoken industry titan, the board should have told Musk to hit the bricks.

Had Musk signed on to the settlement, he wouldn’t have had to admit guilt for tweeting “funding secured” on August 7th, part of an ultimately ill-fated attempt to take Tesla private. The settlement would, however, have kept Musk from the chairman’s position for two years, while compelling the automaker to hire two independent directors.

“This unjustified action by the SEC leaves me deeply saddened and disappointed,” Musk said to CNBC. “I have always taken action in the best interests of truth, transparency and investors. Integrity is the most important value in my life and the facts will show I never compromised this in any way.”

Says the man who accused a British rescuer he’s never met a “pedo” on Twitter, apologized, then called him a “child rapist” and dared him to sue, eventually getting his wish. It’s hard to ignore recent controversies at times like this, and Musk’s tendency for spur-of-the-moment social media bozo eruptions certainly doesn’t help his case.

In its lawsuit, the SEC claims Musk mislead investors and failed to inform the Nasdaq when he tweeted, in the middle of a trading day, his plan to take Tesla private at $420 a share. Yes, it turns out that is a drug reference. Interest expressed by Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund apparently led Musk to believe the money would be there when he needed it. That potential funding wasn’t as secured as the CEO claimed. Musk abandoned the go-private bid on August 24th.

In a statement, Tesla’s board wrote,”Tesla and the board of directors are fully confident in Elon, his integrity, and his leadership of the company, which has resulted in the most successful U.S. auto company in over a century. Our focus remains on the continued ramp of Model 3 production and delivering for our customers, shareholders and employees.”

Feel free to discuss that awkward “over a century” line.

Should a judge rule in the SEC’s favor, Musk won’t just be gone from the chairman’s seat. The agency wants Musk barred from serving as the director of a public company. Tesla’s stock dropped more than 11 percent in early Friday trading.

If it was left up to Bob Lutz, Tesla’s board would thank Musk, then tell him to step down. The company is a “disastrous mess,” Lutz said while appearing on CNBC.

[Image: Tesla]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 27 comments
  • Mcs Mcs on Sep 29, 2018

    They've settled. Apparently, he's going to step down as chairman of the board and can't run again for 3 years. He can remain CEO. He has to pay a $20 million fine.

  • Art Vandelay Art Vandelay on Oct 01, 2018

    5 Years from now: The new Tesla S...Available at your Lincoln Motor Car Store or Cadillac dealer.

  • Bd2 Mark my words : Lexus Deathwatch Part 1, the T24 From Hell!
  • Michael S6 Cadillac is beyond fixing because of lack of investment and uncompetitive products. The division and GM are essentially held afloat by mega size SUV (and pick up truck GM) that only domestic brainwashed population buys. Cadillac only hope was to leapfrog the competition in the luxury EV market but that turned out disastrously with the botches role out of the Lyriq which is now dead on arrival.
  • BlackEldo I'm not sure the entire brand can be fixed, but maybe they should start with the C pillar on the CT5...
  • Bd2 To sum up my comments and follow-up comments here backed by some data, perhaps Cadillac should look to the Genesis formula in order to secure a more competitive position in the market. Indeed, by using bespoke Rwd chassis, powertrains and interiors Genesis is selling neck and neck with Lexus while ATPs are 15 to 35% higher depending on the segment you are looking at. While Lexus can't sell Rwd sedans, Genesis is outpacing them 2.2 to 1. Genesis is an industry world changing success story, frankly Cadillac would be insane to not replicate it for themselves.
  • Bd2 Even Lexus is feeling the burn of not being able to compete in the e-ATP arena.
Next