Night Moves: Ford Unveils 2020 Explorer Under Cover of Darkness

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

As you learned here, the 2020 Ford Explorer adopts the rear-drive platform found beneath the upcoming Lincoln Aviator, as well as the luxury division’s top-flight engine. A twin-turbo 3.0-liter V6 of unspecified power will appear under its hood and mate to a 10-speed automatic, a source tells us, while the 3.3-liter V6 found in the F-150 replaces the current 3.5-liter unit. The 2.3-liter EcoBoost four-cylinder carries on unchanged for thrifty buyers.

Oh, and there’ll be a hybrid version, too. Ford’s only willing to talk about the electrified Explorer at this point, and on Tuesday it made the unusual choice of debuting the 2020 Explorer in fuel-sipping felon catcher guise.

Enter the Police Interceptor Utility hybrid.

As you can see here (or can’t, as the case would be), the creases and curves of the 2020 Explorer aren’t exactly bathed in bright sunlight. Ford’s going the striptease route for this reveal. Naturally, we lightened the provided photos for your benefit, though the difference isn’t exactly, ahem, night and day.

Regardless, the new Explorer’s shortened front overhang and trimmer, more angular proportions aren’t entirely hidden from view. Like with the Aviator, Ford’s CD6 platform allows for a more upscale, almost Range Rover-esque profile.

And what of Ford’s first front-line cop SUV hybrid? Plenty of expectations, but few specifics. The automaker won’t even describe the engine, nor the output or battery capacity. Instead, the Blue Oval boys want to discuss the police department’s budget.

Having these things in a law enforcement fleet stands to save the operator $3,200 per vehicle in annual fuel costs, the automaker estimates, thanks to the model’s projected combined fuel economy of “at least” 24 mpg. That’s a 40 percent improvement from a contemporary Police Interceptor Utility equipped with a 3.7-liter V6, Ford claims.

To put that fuel economy figure into context, the thriftiest Explorer currently in Ford’s stable is the front-drive 2.3-liter civilian model, which returns 22 mpg combined. Adding all-wheel drive — standard on cop variants — drops that figure to 21 mpg.

Further fuel savings come from the hybrid’s ability to power all accessories via its lithium-ion battery when the vehicle isn’t in motion, like during a stakeout or while sitting at a speed trap. Ford made a similar claim last year when it debuted a “pursuit-rated” Fusion hybrid. Given the automaker’s decision to chop all sedans from its portfolio (the Fusion Hybrid and Energi might last the longest of them all), having a hybrid cop SUV is essential for preserving the brand’s green street cred.

Ford says the Police Interceptor Utility hybrid, when equipped with a Class III tow package, should be able to haul around up to 5,000 pounds.

That’s the entirety of what we know about this vehicle’s specs, though Ford’s making one new feature available to law enforcement buyers. The Police Perimeter Alert system places the blind-spot monitoring system on sentry duty, scanning 270 degrees of the vehicle’s perimeter to pinpoint potential threats. Motion of surrounding objects is analyzed to determine a threat level, with the activity displayed via the vehicle’s instrument cluster.

“When suspicious behavior is detected, the vehicle automatically sounds a chime, rolls up the windows and locks the doors,” Ford claims.

The 2020 Explorer, in both cop and civilian guise, rolls out next summer.

[Images: Ford Motor Company]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 36 comments
  • EBFlex EBFlex on Jun 13, 2018

    So Ford, in their infinite stupidity, decided it was a good idea to reveal their second most important product behind the Fseries, as a fleet model that people cannot buy. Further, why would they spend all that time and energy redesigning the Explorer when the end result looks exactly the same as the current one? So we will have an all new Explorer that’s as bland as a bowl of cold oatmeal. Brilliant furniture guy, brilliant. Mark Fields would have never let this level of incompetence happen.

  • Conslaw Conslaw on Dec 01, 2020

    $3,200 per year in fuel savings is not too shabby. Even if it is just half that, over 7 years is $11,200.

  • MacTassos Bagpipes. And loud ones at that.Bagpipes for back up warning sounds.Bagpipes for horns.Bagpipes for yellow light warning alert and louder bagpipes for red light warnings.Bagpipes for drowsy driver alerts.Bagpipes for using your phone while driving.Bagpipes for following too close.Bagpipes for drifting out of your lane.Bagpipes for turning without signaling.Bagpipes for warning your lights are off when driving at night.Bagpipes for not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.Bagpipes for seat belts not buckled.Bagpipes for leaving the iron on when going on vacation. I’ll ne’er make that mistake agin’.
  • TheEndlessEnigma I would mandate the elimination of all autonomous driving tech in automobiles. And specifically for GM....sorry....gm....I would mandate On Star be offered as an option only.Not quite the question you asked but.....you asked.
  • MaintenanceCosts There's not a lot of meat to this (or to an argument in the opposite direction) without some data comparing the respective frequency of "good" activations that prevent a collision and false alarms. The studies I see show between 25% and 40% reduction in rear-end crashes where AEB is installed, so we have one side of that equation, but there doesn't seem to be much if any data out there on the frequency of false activations, especially false activations that cause a collision.
  • Zerocred Automatic emergency braking scared the hell out of me. I was coming up on a line of stopped cars that the Jeep (Grand Cherokee) thought was too fast and it blared out an incredibly loud warbling sound while applying the brakes. I had the car under control and wasn’t in danger of hitting anything. It was one of those ‘wtf just happened’ moments.I like adaptive cruise control, the backup camera and the warning about approaching emergency vehicles. I’m ambivalent  about rear cross traffic alert and all the different tones if it thinks I’m too close to anything. I turned off lane keep assist, auto start-stop, emergency backup stop. The Jeep also has automatic parking (parallel and back in), which I’ve never used.
  • MaintenanceCosts Mandatory speed limiters.Flame away - I'm well aware this is the most unpopular opinion on the internet - but the overwhelming majority of the driving population has not proven itself even close to capable of managing unlimited vehicles, and it's time to start dealing with it.Three important mitigations have to be in place:(1) They give 10 mph grace on non-limited-access roads and 15-20 on limited-access roads. The goal is not exact compliance but stopping extreme speeding.(2) They work entirely locally, except for downloading speed limit data for large map segments (too large to identify with any precision where the driver is). Neither location nor speed data is ever uploaded.(3) They don't enforce on private property, only on public roadways. Race your track cars to your heart's content.
Next