QOTD: What Would It Take to Get You Into a Volkswagen Pickup?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

So, who’s excited about the mere possibility of purchasing a German pickup in the relatively near future? Let’s see a show of hands.

Volkswagen says it will build the Atlas Tanoak (pronounced “tan-oke” — unless you’re German, apparently) if the American buying public plays nice. If head office feels good vibes from the concept vehicle’s appearance at the New York International Auto Show, there’ll be a relatively butch-looking new unibody pickup tossed into the midsize market.

Will you be one of the showroom denizens kicking the tires on a Tanoak? While the production version, if built, contains plenty of unknowns — price, payload, practicality — there’s plenty to go on from Wednesday’s unveiling. Maybe a rundown of its would-be rivals is in order.

For the sake of simplicity, let’s say the only version of the Tanoak offered is a crew cab, all-wheel-drive, V6-powered model. The concept contains an eight-speed automatic, so an autobox becomes part of our template, too. Interestingly, its bed length (tailgate up) is 64.1 inches, the longest (by a hair) of a group containing the similar Honda Ridgeline and short-bed versions of the Chevrolet Colorado, Nissan Frontier, and Toyota Tacoma.

Because we’re not used to its presence, as well as the fact that it’s not yet on the market (and Ford hasn’t created a build and price tool), the Ford Ranger won’t appear in this piece.

Of the short-box, six-cylinder, crew cab models here, the Colorado’s 1,548-pound payload just barely tops the Ridgeline’s 1,465-pound rating. The Frontier’s 1,340-pound rating pushes the Tacoma’s (1,175 lbs) to last place. We suspect this rating isn’t top of mind for those looking at smaller trucks, considering there’s deals, deals, deals to be had on 2018 Rams.

In terms of price, the Ridgeline’s the dearest — but only by a pocketful. The unibody Ridgeline Sport AWD tips the financial scales at $36,265 after delivery, just a tick above the Tacoma SR5 4×4 V6’s all-in price of $36,110. The Colorado WT 4WD V6 crew cab’s $32,495 price trails the two imports, but it’s the ancient-but-cheap Frontier S V6 Crew Cab that’s the bargain of the bunch. The decade-old model still delivers big sales numbers for Nissan, and with good reason — outfitted like the others, the Frontier rings in at $30,065, all told.

Once the Ranger arrives, an even tougher market awaits any truck bearing the VW badge. So, how does the Tanoak get noticed? Will it be payload and towing? Overall refinement? Looks? Price? Euro snobbery? If you’re in the market for a midsize, what does the Tanoak have to do to raise your interest enough to even consider a purchase?

[Images: Volkswagen, General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 98 comments
  • Lon888 Lon888 on Mar 30, 2018

    Speaking as a current GTI owner - a very, very large crowbar.

  • WildcatMatt WildcatMatt on Apr 17, 2018

    For me, it would be sufficient legroom, a 10/100 warranty, and an out the door price $5k less than a comparable Colorado.

  • Varezhka I have still yet to see a Malibu on the road that didn't have a rental sticker. So yeah, GM probably lost money on every one they sold but kept it to boost their CAFE numbers.I'm personally happy that I no longer have to dread being "upgraded" to a Maxima or a Malibu anymore. And thankfully Altima is also on its way out.
  • Tassos Under incompetent, affirmative action hire Mary Barra, GM has been shooting itself in the foot on a daily basis.Whether the Malibu cancellation has been one of these shootings is NOT obvious at all.GM should be run as a PROFITABLE BUSINESS and NOT as an outfit that satisfies everybody and his mother in law's pet preferences.IF the Malibu was UNPROFITABLE, it SHOULD be canceled.More generally, if its SEGMENT is Unprofitable, and HALF the makers cancel their midsize sedans, not only will it lead to the SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST ones, but the survivors will obviously be more profitable if the LOSERS were kept being produced and the SMALL PIE of midsize sedans would yield slim pickings for every participant.SO NO, I APPROVE of the demise of the unprofitable Malibu, and hope Nissan does the same to the Altima, Hyundai with the SOnata, Mazda with the Mazda 6, and as many others as it takes to make the REMAINING players, like the Excellent, sporty Accord and the Bulletproof Reliable, cheap to maintain CAMRY, more profitable and affordable.
  • GregLocock Car companies can only really sell cars that people who are new car buyers will pay a profitable price for. As it turns out fewer and fewer new car buyers want sedans. Large sedans can be nice to drive, certainly, but the number of new car buyers (the only ones that matter in this discussion) are prepared to sacrifice steering and handling for more obvious things like passenger and cargo space, or even some attempt at off roading. We know US new car buyers don't really care about handling because they fell for FWD in large cars.
  • Slavuta Why is everybody sweating? Like sedans? - go buy one. Better - 2. Let CRV/RAV rust on the dealer lot. I have 3 sedans on the driveway. My neighbor - 2. Neighbors on each of our other side - 8 SUVs.
  • Theflyersfan With sedans, especially, I wonder how many of those sales are to rental fleets. With the exception of the Civic and Accord, there are still rows of sedans mixed in with the RAV4s at every airport rental lot. I doubt the breakdown in sales is publicly published, so who knows... GM isn't out of the sedan business - Cadillac exists and I can't believe I'm typing this but they are actually decent - and I think they are making a huge mistake, especially if there's an extended oil price hike (cough...Iran...cough) and people want smaller and hybrids. But if one is only tied to the quarterly shareholder reports and not trends and the big picture, bad decisions like this get made.
Next