As Tesla Model 3 Reservation Holders Wait (and Wait and Wait), GM Says It'll Play Nice

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

The number of people willing to plunk down a $1,000 deposit for a Tesla Model 3 currently stands at about 455,000. In the third quarter of 2017, Tesla delivered 220 units of its smallest and most affordable electric car. Last quarter, some 1,550 buyers took ownership.

If it looks like it’s shaping up to be a long wait for the newest reservation holders, you’re right. Tesla claims it has succeeded in working out some of the issues hampering production at its Fremont, California assembly plant, but the pushed-back ramp-up of Model 3 production means some reservation holders won’t see their new car this decade. Meanwhile, you can not only walk into a General Motors dealer and order a Chevrolet Bolt today, but you can expect delivery well before the 2020 election campaign gets into full swing.

Is GM planning to exploit its competitor’s production woes? Not us, the automaker claims.

Speaking to Automotive News, Steve Majoros, marketing director of Chevrolet cars and crossovers, said a targeted campaign is “not in the cards.”

If it did, it wouldn’t be first time an automaker tried to lure Model 3 groupies away from the band. In early 2016, Nissan launched an ad aimed at those waiting for Tesla’s upcoming wundersedan. “Why wait when you can drive an all-electric Nissan Leaf today?” the cheeky company stated, hammering the point home by saying, “No one should have any reservations about getting an electric car today.”

Nissan also tossed incentives at would-be buyers in the hopes of picking up some fence sitters. of course, brand loyalty plays a big part in electric vehicle purchasing, and there’s no group of people more willing to wait for a car than Tesla devotees. Should any of these reservation holders grow tired of sitting by the phone, Nissan’s second-generation Leaf is currently waiting at the door, flowers in hand. It’s part of a growing segment that includes the Bolt and Hyundai Ioniq.

One of the reasons for GM’s attitude could be the Bolt’s strong sales numbers. Since availability reached all 50 states last summer, GM has seen Bolt sales rise each consecutive month. No need to rock the EV boat, perhaps. December saw the model top the 3,000-unit mark in the U.S. (3,227, to be exact), with volume for the whole year standing at 23,297 vehicles.

Both Bolt and Model 3 share a similar entry price, with the GM vehicle edging out the base Model 3 in terms of range. Pricier, 300-mile Long Range variants were first off the Tesla assembly line.

In a statement, Tesla claims it is “very appreciative” of the customers who “continue to stick by” the company. GM says a study group held last year showed early Bolt buyers remained fairly interested in the Model 3, though Majoros told AN that Chevy has seen an unspecified number of Tesla buyers show up looking for an EV. It’s quite possible that, in some cases, the Bolt is the model holding over the buyer until the Model 3 wait window closes.

In its quarterly update, Tesla said it expects to produce 3,000 Model 3s per week by the end of the second quarter of 2018. When production kicked off, the company hoped to hit that mark by the end of 2017.

[Image: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
4 of 45 comments
  • Conundrum Conundrum on Jan 08, 2018

    " Tesla claims it has succeeded in working out some of the issues hampering production " Someone found the on-off switch on that Michigan-made pre-built production line, perhaps? Sedan sales are falling off everywhere, but up to 445,000 deposit-waving semi-delusional folk like them just fine in Model 3 duds. They want to be part of a religious movement. Judging by the 550 per month build rate in QTR 4, they're being built by people wielding rubber mallets and tinsnips while trireme-trained taskmasters flick whips over the straining crew. Of course, the official reason is that the Gigafactory cannot weld those cells into battery packs quickly enough. This charade has gone on long enough, surely. It's time to sh!t or get off the pot when you are so vertically integrated, responsible for most of the bits and pieces yourself. Next we'll find out that the $35K price really was a come-on.

    • SCE to AUX SCE to AUX on Jan 09, 2018

      Are you saying that because sedans are losing popularity, Model 3 buyers have a misplaced interest in that car and really ought to buy a CUV? Is it possible they just prefer low operating costs in a nice-looking car that does 0-60 in 4.7 seconds? No, that's not possible; it must be a religious thing because stereotypes work best on TTAC.

  • John Horner John Horner on Jan 08, 2018

    About a year ago I took a tour of Tesla's factory. The tour guides were oh so proud of how the company had reinvented automotive manufacturing. Meanwhile I was wondering why they were turning out one vehicle per hour from a factory Toyota used to make one vehicles per 30 seconds in. It is cliche, but still true, so say that Toyota has forgotten more about high quality volume production than Tesla management knows.

    • Big Al from Oz Big Al from Oz on Jan 09, 2018

      John, I think the biggest problem at Tesla is Musk. His visions, which he has many visions (some are interesting) are complicating the production side of his business. Musk should just let the subject matter experts do their job. He must listen to them. I think the best chance anyone has of ever seeing a Model 3 is someone/s need to force Musk into offloading Tesla. I had a "Big Al" vision, many will lose lots of money soon in Tesla or dealing with Tesla. I think Sergio is a far better operator than Musk.

  • SilverCoupe Tim, you don't always watch F1 as you don't want to lose sleep? But these races are great for putting one to sleep!I kid (sort of). I DVR them, I watch them, I fast forward a lot. It was great to see Lando win one, I've been a fan of McLaren since their heyday in CanAm in the late '60's.
  • Cprescott The problem with this fable by the FTC is:(1) shipping of all kinds was hindered at ports because of COVID related issues;(2) The President shafted the Saudis by insulting them with a fist bump that torqued them off to no end;(3) Saudis announced unilateral production cuts repeatedly during this President's tenure even as he begged to get them to produce more;(4) We were told that we had record domestic production so that would have lowered prices due to increased supply(5) The President emptied the strategic petroleum reserve to the lowest point since the 1980's due to number 3 and then sold much of that to China.We have repeatedly been told that documents and emails are Russian disinformation so why now are we to believe this?
  • Ollicat Another Biden attempt to say, "Look over there!"
  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh Who cares. Price of gas is not the issue. spending an extra 100$ a month over 4 tanks of gas is not the issue.this a political scam to distract really dumb people from the real issue. if rent and house payments were not up by 50% to as high as 150% higher in a ton of locations, then paying an extra 100$ in gas would be annoying but not really an issue. But the real-estate market with hedge fund investors, power-relator groups bought a ton of houses and flipped them into rentals and jacked up the rates uplifting the costs on everything else. and ironically no-one seems to be in any hurry to build more houses to bring those costs down because supply and demand means keeping less houses available to charge as much as you want. It is also not the issue as a secondary issue is child care costs and medical... again 100$ extra per month in gas is *nothing* compared to 800$ a month in ''child care'' and 300$ per visit to the doctor office, 300$ for a procedure less dentist trip..
  • Ajla Is there something proprietary or installed on the moon with these that I'm not aware of?
Next