Yet Another Transmission Shifter Problem at Fiat Chrysler; 1.48 Million Rams Recalled

by Steph Willems

Published: December 23rd, 2017

yet another transmission shifter problem at fiat chrysler 1 48 million rams recalled

For a while, it seemed Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ fancy (and confusing) console-mounted monostable shifters and newer rotary-dial shifters were out to give every FCA executive a headache. Unfortunately for them, there’s new safety issue causing vehicle rollaways, and this time it’s from a seemingly tried-and-true bit of automotive gear.

The traditional column shifter.

FCA is now recalling 1.48 million Ram pickups spanning nine model years to prevent further injuries and accidents.

Past recalls and investigations involved operators of monostable shifters incorrectly thinking they had shifted into park (when the vehicle was actually still in drive or reverse), or vehicles with rotary gearshifts rolling away after the driver selected park. This recall concerns the failure of the shift interlock in certain vehicles, which allows the shift lever to be accidentally moved out of the park position.

From the company’s media release:

An FCA US review of field data led to the discovery that Brake Transmission Shift Interlock (BTSI) may not function properly if subject to specific high-temperature conditions for prolonged periods. The conditions are consistent with those that occur when there is protracted brake-pedal application while a vehicle is idling in park.

If BTSI becomes disabled, a vehicle’s shifter may be moved out of park without brake-pedal application, or the presence of a key in the ignition. In such circumstances, a vehicle may exhibit inadvertent movement – if its parking brake has not been set, as recommended in FCA US owners’ manuals.

The automaker claims it is aware of seven “potentially related” injuries and a “small number” of accidents that might stem from the wonky shifters.

FCA says the recall will restore BTSI function in the affected vehicles. There’s a number of Ram models included in the campaign, with most falling under the Heavy Duty banner. The recall includes 2010-2017 Ram 2500 and 3500 pickups, 2011-2017 Ram 3500, 4500 and 5500 chassis cabs, 2016-2017 Ram 3500 chassis cabs (with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating of less than 10,000 pounds), and some 2009-2017 Ram 1500 pickups.

Trucks from the 2017 model year built after December 31st, 2016, are not included in the recall. If you’re worried about the vehicle sitting in your driveway, there’s a number (866-220-6747) to call. Meanwhile, give your left foot a workout and start using that parking brake.

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

#Fca #FiatChryslerAutomobiles #Quality #Ram #Ram1500 #Ram2500 #Ram3500 #RamHeavyDuty #Recall #Safety #Trucks

Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments

Join the conversation

3 of 25 comments

Guardian452 on Dec 29, 2017

The BTSI solenoid on the Promaster becomes too hot to touch after only a minute or so. Much longer than that and it will melt the shifter housing. I think in practice your foot will get tired of holding the brake before that happens. No AT park pawl is designed to hold any vehicle parked, especially on a hill. They are anti-theft devices, plain and simple. FMVSS brake standards test the parking brake only, not anything in the transmission. They are overbuilt to survive this abuse at least until the warranty period expires, that is all. When we had to have a vehicle recertified for FMVSS 105 after some modifications, we used a prototype that didn't even have a park pawl and the proving ground didn't care. FCA's BTSI solenoid isn't nearly as problematic as their key lock solenoid and ignition switch. Oy!

Like Reply
CombiCoupe99 on Jan 05, 2018

Why do manufacturers try to reinvent the stuff that already works?

Like Reply
- Richard Baker on Jan 12, 2018
  
  CombiCoupe99: Because the public demands new and different. I agree that they should not have reinvented the wheel but they are trying to show how leading edge they are and unfortunately there are problems.
  
  Like

Recent Comments

Bd2 Lexus is just a higher trim package Toyota. ^^
Tassos ONLY consider CIvics or Corollas, in their segment. NO DAMNED Hyundais, Kias, Nissans or esp Mitsus. Not even a Pretend-BMW Mazda. They may look cute but they SUCK.I always recommend Corollas to friends of mine who are not auto enthusiasts, even tho I never owed one, and owned a Civic Hatch 5 speed 1992 for 25 years. MANY follow my advice and are VERY happy. ALmost all are women.friends who believe they are auto enthusiasts would not listen to me anyway, and would never buy a Toyota. They are damned fools, on both counts.
Tassos since Oct 2016 I drive a 2007 E320 Bluetec and since April 2017 also a 2008 E320 Bluetec.Now I am in my summer palace deep in the Eurozone until end October and drive the 2008.Changing the considerable oils (10 quarts synthetic) twice cost me 80 and 70 euros. Same changes in the US on the 2007 cost me $219 at the dealers and $120 at Firestone.Changing the air filter cost 30 Euros, with labor, and there are two such filters (engine and cabin), and changing the fuel filter only 50 euros, while in the US they asked for... $400. You can safely bet I declined and told them what to do with their gold-plated filter. And when I changed it in Europe, I looked at the old one and it was clean as a whistle.A set of Continentals tires, installed etc, 300 EurosI can't remember anything else for the 2008. For the 2007, a brand new set of manual rec'd tires at Discount Tire with free rotations for life used up the $500 allowance the dealer gave me when I bought it (tires only had 5000 miles left on them then)So, as you can see, I spent less than even if I owned a Lexus instead, and probably less than all these poor devils here that brag about their alleged low cost Datsun-Mitsus and Hyundai-Kias.And that's THETRUTHABOUTCARS. My Cars,
NJRide These are the Q1 Luxury division salesAudi 44,226Acura 30,373BMW 84,475Genesis 14,777Mercedes 66,000Lexus 78,471Infiniti 13,904Volvo 30,000*Tesla (maybe not luxury but relevant): 125,000?Lincoln 24,894Cadillac 35,451So Cadillac is now stuck as a second-tier player with names like Volvo. Even German 3rd wheel Audi is outselling them. Where to gain sales?Surprisingly a decline of Tesla could boost Cadillac EVs. Tesla sort of is now in the old Buick-Mercury upper middle of the market. If lets say the market stays the same, but another 15-20% leave Tesla I could see some going for a Caddy EV or hybrid, but is the division ready to meet them?In terms of the mainstream luxury brands, Lexus is probably a better benchmark than BMW. Lexus is basically doing a modern interpretation of what Cadillac/upscale Olds/Buick used to completely dominate. But Lexus' only downfall is the lack of emotion, something Cadillac at least used to be good at. The Escalade still has far more styling and brand ID than most of Lexus. So match Lexus' quality but out-do them on comfort and styling. Yes a lot of Lexus buyers may be Toyota or import loyal but there are a lot who are former GM buyers who would "come home" for a better product.In fact, that by and large is the Big 3's problem. In the 80s and 90s they would try to win back "import intenders" and this at least slowed the market share erosion. I feel like around 2000 they gave this up and resorted to a ton of gimmicks before the bankruptcies. So they have dropped from 66% to 37% of the market in a quarter century. Sure they have scaled down their presence and for the last 14 years preserved profit. But in the largest, most prosperous market in the world they are not leading. I mean who would think the Koreans could take almost 10% of the market? But they did because they built and structured products people wanted. (I also think the excess reliance on overseas assembly by the Big 3 hurts them vs more import brands building in US). But the domestics should really be at 60% of their home market and the fact that they are not speaks volumes. Cadillac should not be losing 2-1 to Lexus and BMW.
Tassos Not my favorite Eldorados. Too much cowbell (fins), the gauges look poor for such an expensive car, the interior has too many shiny bits but does not scream "flagship luxury", and the white on red leather or whatever is rather loud for this car, while it might work in a Corvette. But do not despair, a couple more years and the exterior designs (at least) will sober up, the cowbells will be more discreet and the long, low and wide 60s designs are not far away. If only the interiors would be fit for the price point, and especially a few acres of real wood that also looked real.