Ford's Marketing Strategy for Plug-in F-150 Fixates on More Power

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

The pervasive opinion among truck enthusiasts and industry experts is that nobody cares about plug-in hybrid pickups. Fuel economy isn’t a major priority among those in the market for something that can haul bales of hay or a stable of horses.

This poses a problem for pickup manufacturers striving for lower emissions and fuel consumption. Ford, which previously lightened the F-150 and outfitted it with a bevy of more economical engines, knows this problem better than most.

However, Ford is pressing onwards. It even intends to bring a hybrid plug-in variant of its ultra-popular pickup to the market in the coming years. But how is it going to market the technology to consumers who are unlikely to care? The company has strategy for that and it’s less reliant on fuel savings than you might expect.

Ford is fixating on more power — specifically, the juice available via an on-board generator. “It still may be a hard sell,” Michelle Krebs, an analyst at Autotrader, explained to Bloomberg. “but they’ve got to have this in their lineup.” Ford is spending $4.5 billion to launch 13 electric and hybrid models by 2020, including a gas-electric Mustang. The hybridized F-150 is likely to be part of that electric expansion.

With its hands tied as a result of fuel efficiency regulations, Ford thinks it can highlight the benefits of owning a hybrid truck where you can plug in your appliances or tools. This revelation came after the company spent a year trying to figure out how best to market the new vehicle. “We immersed ourselves in their lives,” said Nadia Preston, the research team’s project leader, of the model’s buyers. “That meant going camping with them, tailgating, going to rodeos, even spending the night.”

Hau Thai-Tang, the product-development chief who has led the push toward EVs, said the team found that truck owners could benefit from having a mobile generator built into a vehicle. “We would see our customers just literally buying generators from Home Depot and strapping them down in their truck beds,” Thai-Tang said.

Whether used for camping or worksites, access to power is an invaluable asset and the lynchpin for Ford’s marketing strategy for the plug-in F-Series. Currently, the company hasn’t expressed how many hybrid trucks it hopes to sell, but analysts believe adding high-wattage power ports would add $5,000 to the base cost of most electrified vehicles. That’s quite a bit more than a portable generator, but Ford hasn’t announced any official pricing yet.

“You would need some motivation to invest in an electric pickup,” said Xavier Mosquet, senior partner at Boston Consulting Group, who claims pickups will be the segment least likely to be swept up in the electrification hullabaloo. “Unless you think the generator itself has value — which for many customers in this segment, it will.”

Either way, the automaker is not going to instantly abandon the existing powertrains. The F-Series can still be had with a V8, despite the undeniable might of the EcoBoost V6, and Ford is too smart to replace traditional engines with a hybrid powerplant. Shoppers will still have an abundance of choice in the years to come and the F-Series will probably persist as America’s best-selling truck for some time.

[Image: Ford Motor Co.]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 33 comments
  • Frank Williams Frank Williams on Dec 03, 2017

    Yeah. Because a hybrid pickup with on-board generator did so well when GM tried selling one 13 years ago.

    • El scotto El scotto on Dec 03, 2017

      Did you have to buy the LTZ/Z71 trim package to get the on board generator? In my mind, GM marketing would have had you buy a lot of options to get the generator. If an on-board generator is a $500 option on a WT/Xl; that's whole different story.

  • EBFlex EBFlex on Dec 03, 2017

    So Ford has given up on making the the Ecobust engines reliable and efficient and now are going the hybrid route? There goes the pitiful weight savings from the beer can body and then some.

  • El scotto No rag-top, no rag-top(s) = not a prestigious car brand. Think it through. All of the high-end Germans and Lexus have rag-tops. Corvette is really its own brand.World-leading engines. AMG, M, S and well Lexus is third-world tough. GM makes one of the best V-8s in the world in Bowling Green. But nooooo, noooo, we're GM only Corvettes get Corvette engines. Balderdash! I say. Put Corvette engines in the top-tier Cadillacs. I know GM could make a world-class 3.5 liter V-6 but they don't or won't. In the interior everything that gets touched, including your butt, has to feel good. No exceptions.Some think that those who pay above MSRP and brag about it are idiots. Go the opposite direction, and offer an extended 10-year 100,000-mile factory warranty. At a reasonable price. That's Acura's current business model.
  • Carrera 2014 Toyota Corolla with 192,000 miles bought new. Oil changes every 5,000 miles, 1 coolant flush, and a bunch of air filters and in cabin air filters, and wipers. On my 4th set of tires.Original brake pads ( manual transmission), original spark plugs. Nothing else...it's a Toyota. Did most of oil changes either free at Toyota or myself. Also 3 batteries.2022 Acura TLX A-Spec AWD 13,000 miles now but bought new.Two oil changes...2006 Hyundai Elantra gifted from a colleague with 318,000 when I got it, and 335,000 now. It needed some TLC. A set of cheap Chinese tires ($275), AC compressor, evaporator, expansion valve package ( $290) , two TYC headlights $120, one battery ( $95), two oil changes, air filters, Denso alternator ( $185), coolant, and labor for AC job ( $200).
  • Mike-NB2 This is a mostly uninformed vote, but I'll go with the Mazda 3 too.I haven't driven a new Civic, so I can't say anything about it, but two weeks ago I had a 2023 Corolla as a rental. While I can understand why so many people buy these, I was surprised at how bad the CVT is. Many rentals I've driven have a CVT and while I know it has one and can tell, they aren't usually too bad. I'd never own a car with a CVT, but I can live with one as a rental. But the Corolla's CVT was terrible. It was like it screamed "CVT!" the whole time. On the highway with cruise control on, I could feel it adjusting to track the set speed. Passing on the highway (two-lane) was risky. The engine isn't under-powered, but the CVT makes it seem that way.A minor complaint is about the steering. It's waaaay over-assisted. At low speeds, it's like a 70s LTD with one-finger effort. Maybe that's deliberate though, given the Corolla's demographic.
  • Mike-NB2 2019 Ranger - 30,000 miles / 50,000 km. Nothing but oil changes. Original tires are being replaced a week from Wednesday. (Not all that mileage is on the original A/S tires. I put dedicated winter rims/tires on it every winter.)2024 - Golf R - 1700 miles / 2800 km. Not really broken in yet. Nothing but gas in the tank.
  • SaulTigh I've got a 2014 F150 with 87K on the clock and have spent exactly $4,180.77 in maintenance and repairs in that time. That's pretty hard to beat.Hard to say on my 2019 Mercedes, because I prepaid for three years of service (B,A,B) and am getting the last of those at the end of the month. Did just drop $1,700 on new Michelins for it at Tire Rack. Tires for the F150 late last year were under $700, so I'd say the Benz is roughly 2 to 3 times as pricy for anything over the Ford.I have the F150 serviced at a large independent shop, the Benz at the dealership.
Next