QOTD: How Can a Chevrolet Bolt-based Crossover Avoid Flopping?

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

You heard it here yesterday. General Motors will introduce not one, not two, but three new vehicles based on the increasingly popular Chevrolet Bolt electric hatchback. And it’ll do it over the next two years.

Is this a case of too much Bolt, too soon, or is GM within its rights to go whole hog on its green halo model, given the need to get out in front of looming competitors? One of the Bolt-based EVs will be a car, the other two, crossovers. Let’s focus on the latter models right now.

What must a Bolt-derived electric crossover bring to the table to get American buyers interested?

I place an emphasis on American buyers, as it is not confirmed that all three vehicles will launch in the U.S. market. That doesn’t seem like GM’s style, especially considering how many sales such a vehicle could gobble up in China. GM already sells a Buick-badged Chevrolet Volt and Bolt over there, and a small crossover could prove to be catnip to Chinese buyers.

It also might prove alluring to enough to American buyers to make it worthwhile here. There’s no way GM will let Ford’s future electric crossover go unchallenged, and it certainly won’t let its traditional rival introduce one first.

There’s also little doubt that at least one of these vehicles will arrive with a Buick badge. GM reportedly tested a Buick-badged, Bolt-based crossover with a focus group back in July, and Buick sales chief Duncan Aldred has said the brand will play a “ huge part” in the company’s green wave.

Sharing the same underpinnings, the two crossovers will surely court two different classes of buyers.

But back to nuts and bolts, as it were. What does this pair of vehicles need to offer in order to lure American buyers? Is a bigger battery required, considering the Bolt’s healthy 238-mile range will surely be hampered by extra weight and drag? Or is, say, 200 miles of range still enough? All-wheel drive, at least in one of the models (or on higher trims), is a must in my mind. You don’t field a crossover in the U.S. without offering four-wheel traction, unless your name’s Kia. GM needs to show that electric power can tackle the harsh climes of Vermont, Montana, and Wisconsin.

For this, a dual-motor setup is unavoidable.

And what about price? For either model, undercutting the moneybags Tesla Model X is no challenge, but what price point must one of these crossovers start at to make for a palatable proposal? Just imagine you’re pulling the levers at GM, not Mary Barra. These vehicles are a go, and it’s your job to make them a success.

Weigh in in the comment section below.

[Images: General Motors]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 28 comments
  • Bd2 Let's Go Brandon!
  • JMII Given the number of minor fender benders I see due to people rear ending others I am all for emergency braking via some kind of foward collision sensor. Speeding, tailgating, or messing with phones / screens the majority of accidents I see I just people plowing into others. If front collision braking was mandatory in all cars such accidents would be reduced. Is the tech perfect? No... but human drivers can't seem to pay attention so I guess the car has to do that job now. Humans had their chance but they are just too easily distracted behind the wheel. Both my mother and my wife have been rear ended thru no fault of their own so I'll admit some basis here. In my mother's case it took her several months to recover.
  • Zipper69 " including numerous examples of the Cybertruck"I could only see four in the lead photo, but they are kinda anonymous from above...
  • FreedMike These were great cars, but I don't think they're particularly novel or collectible. You can get a newer beater for that money that'd be easier to keep fixed.Good to see these soldiering on, though.
  • Funky D The only piece of technology introduced in the last 10 years that is actually useful is the backup camera. Get rid of the rest. All I want is a car with that and phone connectivity and zero driving nannies.
Next