House Unanimously Approves Proposal to Deploy Self-driving Cars, and Not Everyone's Happy

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

On Wednesday, the U.S. House unanimously approved a sweeping proposal to expedite the deployment of self-driving cars and prohibit states from blocking autonomous vehicle testing.

“With this legislation, innovation can flourish without the heavy hand of government,” Ohio Republican Bob Latta said on the House floor leading up to Wednesday’s vote. Latta is chairman of the House Energy and Commerce subcommittee that developed the legislation with support from tech companies and the automotive industry.

One thing missing from the House measure is large trucks, which the Senate hopes to address in its own bipartisan legislation. Congress announced a September 13th hearing to examine the role of autonomous commercial vehicles and how they may fit into the Senate’s pending self-driving legislation. Meanwhile, the House’s bill moves up the board to be put to a vote within the Senate at a later date.

The proposal would allow automakers to obtain exemptions to deploy up to 25,000 vehicles without meeting existing automotive safety standards in the first year. That threshold would eventually rise to 100,000 vehicles annually. The bill also instructs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to revise its existing standards to include self-driving cars.

Companies hoping to develop autonomous vehicles are also required to draft security and privacy plans that document their approach for ensuring safe testing, but they do not need regulatory approval to put them on the road. Manufacturers are, however, required to demonstrate self-driving cars are at least as mechanically safe as existing vehicles.

Safety was the word of the day prior to the House vote. Representatives took it upon themselves to remind their colleagues that U.S. road deaths rose 7.7 percent in 2015. However, the largest contributing factor to that statistic was a growing population. Still, the NHTSA cites human error as the primary cause for 94 percent of all crashes — making it the perfect bullet point to cap off the debate.

There was also the matter of keeping America competitive. “If we’re going to stay at the forefront of innovation and technology in this country, we have to be driving the technology for autonomous vehicles,” Michigan Democratic Representative Debbie Dingell stated before the vote. “I’m really proud of the fact that we got this out of the House. We kept our heads down.”

Despite the victory, some Democrats expressed concerns over the lack of input on the bill from the NHTSA — which still lacks any Trump-appointed leadership. Others questioned whether the federal government even had a right to impose these vehicles on individual states, including some consumer advocacy groups.

“The autonomous vehicle bill just passed by the House leaves a wild west without adequate safety protections for consumers. It pre-empts any state safety standards, but there are none at the national level,” the Consumer Watchdog group said in a statement.

According to Reuters, U.S. Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao is expected to unveil revised self-driving guidelines on Tuesday in Ann Arbor, Michigan. The department later confirmed its intentions to showcase the rules sometime next week.

[Image: Ford Motor Company]

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
5 of 12 comments
  • Mcs Mcs on Sep 07, 2017

    Some people are happy: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/4-ways-crooks-stage-accidents-to-crash-your-car/ (although they'll probably get busted by the telematics)

    • Vulpine Vulpine on Sep 07, 2017

      That's why many cars are now making dashcams standard equipment. Tesla is supposedly activating one of its navigation cameras to also record, meaning those staged crashes become very obvious and will get the perps arrested and charged with attempted fraud, along with all the traffic charges.

  • BuzzDog BuzzDog on Sep 07, 2017

    "One thing missing from the House measure is large trucks, which the Senate hopes to address in its own bipartisan legislation." Hey, I've got an idea: Why don't we build special roads for these large trucks? That way, we could increase the capacity of these vehicles, perhaps even attach a bunch of the trailers together for efficiency, and maybe include metal rails in the roadway that match the track width of the vehicles' wheels! Nah, too crazy...it'd never work.

    • See 1 previous
    • Turf3 Turf3 on Sep 08, 2017

      All sarcasm aside, it seems to me that the most efficient freight transport mode, were it not for massive highway subsidies, might well be: Rail transport to a terminal, followed by short-haul transport from the terminal to the final destination using electric or hybrid diesel-electric trucks. This is pretty much how things were done in 1890 (except the local transport was by horse or mule drawn wagon).

  • Kjhkjlhkjhkljh kljhjkhjklhkjh And yet cell phones using cobalt in the their batteries, or lithium killing lots of other people is ''aok'' .. let alone the sulfur debacle.Ban one then ban them all .. but we cant. Because we need Chinese resources, Russian resources, Congo resources, India resources to survive .. thanks grandparents for being idiots and putting us all i this mess by making us FOREVER dependent on every foreign power that hates out guts
  • EBFlex *Battery material sourced using child slave labor is exempt. Because child slave labor is A-OK when you're virtue signaling.
  • Jalop1991 Watch us find out that the VW diesel engines were filled with slave labor parts, in the middle of Dieselgate.
  • Bkojote This is actually a huge problem because it's often 4-5 levels down on the supply chain and goods are 'snuck' in to larger component systems. While a lot of these components don't make it to US imported vehicles, they're often used by the chinese subsidiaries.
  • Jeff People complain about there not being enough charging infrastructure. This is a good start with Buc-ee's. I have never been to a Buc-ee's but the next time I see one on the road I will stop and take a look.
Next