Number Crunching: Audi's New Model Naming Process Inspires Confusion, Math

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Remember the good old days, back when the numerical part of a car model’s alphanumeric name usually referred to its placement in the lineup or engine size? That went out with powdered wigs and polio. Get with the times. You can’t even count on Mercedes-Benz or BMW to follow through on that anymore.

Audi, however, seems to be blazing a confusing new trail, one that hopefully doesn’t become the norm within the industry. The automaker announced today it will tack an extra number onto existing alphanumeric names, describing not the displacement, not the wheelbase, but the specific vehicle’s power ranking within the model’s range — using a two-digit number (which means nothing on its own) as a signifier of the vehicle’s horsepower.

Prepare to feel nostalgic.

“Within the model families, combinations of two numbers will replace the various type designations previously used,” the automaker announced. “The new designations stand for the specific power output and apply both to cars with combustion engines and to e-tron models with hybrid and electric drives.”

Affecting every model from the tiny, Europe-only A1 to the range-topping A8 sedan and Q7 SUV, the new naming system hasn’t exactly gone over well with the automotive press. Regardless, it looks like the extra numbers are here to stay.

Here’s what to expect. Vehicles generating 109 to 129 horsepower (who wants that?) carry a “30” designation, while those making 147 to 161 hp receive a “35” on the trunklid. 168 to 201 hp? That earns a model a “40.” On and on it goes up the ladder — 45, 50 (55 isn’t confirmed, reports Wards Auto), 60, topping out at 536-plus-horsepower performance models worthy of a “70” designation.

S and RS models keep their existing names under the new system, as does the R8. As well, all models will keep a reference to the engine technology hiding under the hood — TFSI, TDI, e-tron — so buyers know what they’re dealing with. The first model carrying the extra numerical baggage is the next-generation 2018 A8 due out this fall (launched in A8 50 TDI and A8 55 TFSI versions).

So, who dreamed up this plan? The powers that be in Ingolstadt surely didn’t just wake up one morning and decide en masse to fling numbers around like currywurst after a soccer match. Apparently, the company is hoping to get ahead of confusion caused by new technology.

“As alternative drive technologies become increasingly relevant, engine displacement as a performance attribute is becoming less important to our customers,” said Dr. Dietmar Voggenreiter, Audi AG’s board of management member for sales and marketing, in a statement. “The clarity and logic of structuring the designations according to power output makes it possible to distinguish between the various performance levels.”

Get ready to look down your nose at Audis with a lower “score” than yours.

[Image: Audi AG]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 45 comments
  • Tosh Tosh on Aug 25, 2017

    This is revenge by the marketing dept on the engineers for causing the cheating scandal. Wait 'til you see VW's new scheme!

  • Threeer Threeer on Aug 25, 2017

    "Clarity and logic?'' Not so much. Now I'll need a friggin' decoder ring to decipher Audis.

  • Probert They already have hybrids, but these won't ever be them as they are built on the modular E-GMP skateboard.
  • Justin You guys still looking for that sportbak? I just saw one on the Facebook marketplace in Arizona
  • 28-Cars-Later I cannot remember what happens now, but there are whiteblocks in this period which develop a "tick" like sound which indicates they are toast (maybe head gasket?). Ten or so years ago I looked at an '03 or '04 S60 (I forget why) and I brought my Volvo indy along to tell me if it was worth my time - it ticked and that's when I learned this. This XC90 is probably worth about $300 as it sits, not kidding, and it will cost you conservatively $2500 for an engine swap (all the ones I see on car-part.com have north of 130K miles starting at $1,100 and that's not including freight to a shop, shop labor, other internals to do such as timing belt while engine out etc).
  • 28-Cars-Later Ford reported it lost $132,000 for each of its 10,000 electric vehicles sold in the first quarter of 2024, according to CNN. The sales were down 20 percent from the first quarter of 2023 and would “drag down earnings for the company overall.”The losses include “hundreds of millions being spent on research and development of the next generation of EVs for Ford. Those investments are years away from paying off.” [if they ever are recouped] Ford is the only major carmaker breaking out EV numbers by themselves. But other marques likely suffer similar losses. https://www.zerohedge.com/political/fords-120000-loss-vehicle-shows-california-ev-goals-are-impossible Given these facts, how did Tesla ever produce anything in volume let alone profit?
  • AZFelix Let's forego all of this dilly-dallying with autonomous cars and cut right to the chase and the only real solution.
Next