Hyundai, Hoping to Avoid Falling Behind Again, is Slashing Its Product Design Cycle in Half

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

Getting a new or redesigned model off the drawing board and into showrooms isn’t like designing and posting a meme on Facebook. It’s time consuming, and automakers run the risk of being left behind as rivals cash in on the latest hot bodystyle or styling trend.

Hyundai knows this, having underestimated the buying public’s affection for anything with a high ride height and rear liftgate. The Korean automaker made a bundle on its well-fleshed-out car lineup following the recession, but the seismic shift towards SUVs and crossovers left it scrambling to bolster its three-vehicle utility lineup. The result? Stagnant sales.

This won’t happen under a new plan, the company’s senior vice president of design claims. Hyundai’s hitting the product throttle.

Speaking to Automotive News, Luc Donckerwolke claims Hyundai’s product design cycle will soon drop from three years to 1.5 years, increasing its competitiveness. Rushing vehicles to production isn’t without risk, but the opening of Hyundai’s massive, $67 million Namyang R&D Center near Seoul should help when it comes to avoiding missteps.

“As life cycles get shorter, they will get drastically shorter,” Donckerwolke said. “I have no doubt design can be shortened by half.”

The automaker’s design head feels his styling team should have the development period shaved by 30 percent within a year and a half. All the better for Hyundai, currently in the midst of a product push. The next new product, the controversially styled Kona subcompact crossover, arrives stateside in early 2018. Other utility vehicles carrying Hyundai and Genesis badges are scheduled for arrival in the near future.

That styling team’s responsibility includes transferring elements of the Kona to redesigned Hyundai crossovers. Among them, a revamped Santa Fe and Tucson. Due to its premium status, Genesis’ future models will go their own way, stylistically. Also, for the sake of the fledgling brand, they’ll need to show up sooner rather than later.

Genesis wants its U.S. dealers separated from Hyundai retailers as quickly as possible in a bid to lessen confusion surrounding the brand and pick up a little exclusivity. Currently, there’s only two models inhabiting Genesis showrooms — the midsize G80 and full-size G90 sedans, with a smaller G70 on the way. But, as Hyundai saw with its namesake brand, it’s utilities buyers want. The sooner Genesis stocks its showrooms with utility vehicles (there’s two on the way), the better for everyone involved.

Lee SangYup, vice president for design at Hyundai and Genesis, admits, “We needed a more streamlined process.”

There’s apparently no lack of room at the new R&D center, which Hyundai claims can have teams working on 25 vehicle projects at a time. (The center itself oversees 65 vehicle projects covering the Hyundai and Genesis brands.) Tellingly, despite all the open space — which gives engineers a chance to stare at an unfinished product form some distance away — there’s a big wall between the Hyundai camp and Genesis crew.

“We don’t want our brand to be called Hyundai-Genesis,” Lee said.

[Image: Hyundai]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 20 comments
  • White Shadow White Shadow on Aug 15, 2017

    What? I didn't think I'd ever see the day that the ugly Cherokee styling would be an influence on another vehicle. It's not exactly copied, but it's too similar to ignore the resemblance.

    • Bd2 Bd2 on Aug 15, 2017

      Cherokee or Citroen? Plus, Hyundai had headlights similar in shape on a concept back in 2004. Anyhow, won't look too much the same as the Kona as Hyundai plans on greater differentiation btwn models.

  • Vulpine Vulpine on Aug 15, 2017

    If they'd only release some of the designs they tease, they might do better.

  • Jkross22 I'd imagine there's a booming business available for EV station repair.
  • JLGOLDEN Enormous competition is working against any brand in the fight for "luxury" validation. It gets murky for Cadillac's image when Chevy, Buick, and GMC models keep moving up the luxury features (and price) scale. I think Cadillac needs more consistency with square, crisp designs...even at the expense of aerodynamics and optimized efficiency. Reintroduce names such as DeVille, Seville, El Dorado if you want to create a stir.
  • ClipTheApex I don't understand all of the negativity from folks on this forum regarding Europeans. Having visited the EU multiple times across different countries, I find they are very much like us in North America-- not as different as politicians like to present them. They all aren't liberal "weenies." They are very much like you and me. Unless you've travelled there and engaged with them, it's easy to digest and repeat what we hear. I wish more Americans would travel abroad. When they return, they will have a different view of America. We are not as perfect or special as we like to believe. And no, many Europeans don't look up to America. Quite the opposite, actually.
  • Dwford Let's face it, Cadillac is planning minimal investment in the current ICE products. Their plan is to muddle through until the transition to full EV is complete. The best you are going to get is one more generation of ICE vehicles built on the existing platforms. What should Cadillac do going forward? No more vehicles under $50k. No more compact vehicles. Rely on Buick for that. Many people here mention Genesis. Genesis doesn't sell a small sedan, and they don't sell a small crossover. They sell midsize and above. So should Cadillac.
  • EBFlex Sorry BP. They aren’t any gaps
Next