Overwhelming Majority of Porsche Panamera Buyers Won't Choose the Sport Turismo Shooting Brake

Timothy Cain
by Timothy Cain

In most cases, it’s a foregone conclusion. When there are multiple bodystyles available, the fewest number of buyers exist for the wagon.

The Porsche Panamera’s case is unique, however. There is no Porsche Panamera sedan. This is a battle between the regular second-generation Porsche Panamera — a hatchback or liftback or fastback or backbackbackgone or whatever you want to call it — and the new Sport Turismo, a shooting brake five years in the making.

Yet with limited practical benefit, “It’s a question of taste; some people like the Sport Turismo more, some people like the sports sedan more,” Porsche’s sales and marketing director told Stefan Utsch, told Motoring.

80 percent of taste buds apparently prefer the regular Panamera.

Although the Panamera Sport Turismo offers less than one additional cubic foot of cargo capacity, there’s some flexibility gained by the lower load floor. More importantly, the Panamera Sport Turismo can ferry one additional passenger, though one wonders how many five-occupant Panamera Sport Turismos you’ll see on the morning commute.

So it’s down to the length of the roofline. Do you want it short, or long? “There will be country-specific differences,” Porsche’s Stefan Utsch says, “but in the worldwide perspective we expect to have about 20 per cent share Sport Turismo.” Porsche expects Europe to be more keen on the wagon, but Utsch says demand for the Panamera Sport Turismo in the U.S. and China is a question.

The U.S. and China account for 55 percent of Porsche’s global sales volume.

Porsche is reasonable in its expectations. There’s apparently little hope that the Sport Turismo will dramatically increase overall Panamera sales. “We want to get on-top [incremental] volume but not all will be,” Utsch says. Not only does Porsche believe the Sport Turismo is going to appeal to buyers of conventional Panameras, and vice versa, but Porsche’s Australian public relations chief Paul Ellis says, “This car will appeal to a high-end Cayenne buyer because of its flexibility and extra space.”

In the U.S., where Porsche is on track for roughly 6,000 Panamera sales in 2017, a similar sales pace in 2018 would result in around 1,200 Panamera Sport Turismo sales and 4,800 sales of the established Panamera.

Production of the 2018 Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo began in Leipzig, Germany, in mid-July.

Basic Sport Turismo pricing is $11,200 dearer than for the regular Panamera; $6,600 pricier than the least expensive all-wheel-drive Panamera. The Panamera 4 Sport Turismo’s MSRP is $97,250. One rung up the ladder, the Panamera 4 E-Hybrid Sport Turismo costs $105,050. The the Panamera 4S Sport Turismo enters the fray at $110,250. Topping the range is the $155,050 Panamera Turbo Sport Turismo.

[Images: Porsche]

Timothy Cain is a contributing analyst at The Truth About Cars and Autofocus.ca and the founder and former editor of GoodCarBadCar.net. Follow on Twitter @timcaincars.

Timothy Cain
Timothy Cain

More by Timothy Cain

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 16 comments
  • CV Neuves CV Neuves on Jul 29, 2017

    A great car for plumbers and other tradies that are in a rush. Kudos for Porsche!

  • Pig_Iron Pig_Iron on Jul 31, 2017

    That's too bad, 'cause it's a damned sight more handsome than that dog diarrhea shaped sedan.

  • Jalop1991 In a manner similar to PHEV being the correct answer, I declare RPVs to be the correct answer here.We're doing it with certain aircraft; why not with cars on the ground, using hardware and tools like Telsa's "FSD" or GM's "SuperCruise" as the base?Take the local Uber driver out of the car, and put him in a professional centralized environment from where he drives me around. The system and the individual car can have awareness as well as gates, but he's responsible for the driving.Put the tech into my car, and let me buy it as needed. I need someone else to drive me home; hit the button and voila, I've hired a driver for the moment. I don't want to drive 11 hours to my vacation spot; hire the remote pilot for that. When I get there, I have my car and he's still at his normal location, piloting cars for other people.The system would allow for driver rest period, like what's required for truckers, so I might end up with multiple people driving me to the coast. I don't care. And they don't have to be physically with me, therefore they can be way cheaper.Charge taxi-type per-mile rates. For long drives, offer per-trip rates. Offer subscriptions, including miles/hours. Whatever.(And for grins, dress the remote pilots all as Johnnie.)Start this out with big rigs. Take the trucker away from the long haul driving, and let him be there for emergencies and the short haul parts of the trip.And in a manner similar to PHEVs being discredited, I fully expect to be razzed for this brilliant idea (not unlike how Alan Kay wasn't recognized until many many years later for his Dynabook vision).
  • B-BodyBuick84 Not afraid of AV's as I highly doubt they will ever be %100 viable for our roads. Stop-and-go downtown city or rush hour highway traffic? I can see that, but otherwise there's simply too many variables. Bad weather conditions, faded road lines or markings, reflective surfaces with glare, etc. There's also the issue of cultural norms. About a decade ago there was actually an online test called 'The Morality Machine' one could do online where you were in control of an AV and choose what action to take when a crash was inevitable. I think something like 2.5 million people across the world participated? For example, do you hit and most likely kill the elderly couple strolling across the crosswalk or crash the vehicle into a cement barrier and almost certainly cause the death of the vehicle occupants? What if it's a parent and child? In N. America 98% of people choose to hit the elderly couple and save themselves while in Asia, the exact opposite happened where 98% choose to hit the parent and child. Why? Cultural differences. Asia puts a lot of emphasis on respecting their elderly while N. America has a culture of 'save/ protect the children'. Are these AV's going to respect that culture? Is a VW Jetta or Buick Envision AV going to have different programming depending on whether it's sold in Canada or Taiwan? how's that going to effect legislation and legal battles when a crash inevitibly does happen? These are the true barriers to mass AV adoption, and in the 10 years since that test came out, there has been zero answers or progress on this matter. So no, I'm not afraid of AV's simply because with the exception of a few specific situations, most avenues are going to prove to be a dead-end for automakers.
  • Mike Bradley Autonomous cars were developed in Silicon Valley. For new products there, the standard business plan is to put a barely-functioning product on the market right away and wait for the early-adopter customers to find the flaws. That's exactly what's happened. Detroit's plan is pretty much the opposite, but Detroit isn't developing this product. That's why dealers, for instance, haven't been trained in the cars.
  • Dartman https://apnews.com/article/artificial-intelligence-fighter-jets-air-force-6a1100c96a73ca9b7f41cbd6a2753fdaAutonomous/Ai is here now. The question is implementation and acceptance.
  • FreedMike If Dodge were smart - and I don't think they are - they'd spend their money refreshing and reworking the Durango (which I think is entering model year 3,221), versus going down the same "stuff 'em full of motor and give 'em cool new paint options" path. That's the approach they used with the Charger and Challenger, and both those models are dead. The Durango is still a strong product in a strong market; why not keep it fresher?
Next